Cargando…

Low dose of mycophenolate mofetil is enough in desensitized kidney transplantation using rituximab

BACKGROUND: Rituximab is widely used in kidney transplantation. However, it is not clear whether the conventional doses of maintenance immunosuppressant in rituximab-treated kidney transplantation (KT) are appropriate. In our previous study, decreasing mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) dose due to infecti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Baek, Chung Hee, Kim, Hyosang, Yu, Hoon, Shin, Eunhye, Cho, Hyungjin, Yang, Won Seok, Han, Duck Jong, Park, Su-Kil
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4670498/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26637210
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12882-015-0201-7
_version_ 1782404265712549888
author Baek, Chung Hee
Kim, Hyosang
Yu, Hoon
Shin, Eunhye
Cho, Hyungjin
Yang, Won Seok
Han, Duck Jong
Park, Su-Kil
author_facet Baek, Chung Hee
Kim, Hyosang
Yu, Hoon
Shin, Eunhye
Cho, Hyungjin
Yang, Won Seok
Han, Duck Jong
Park, Su-Kil
author_sort Baek, Chung Hee
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Rituximab is widely used in kidney transplantation. However, it is not clear whether the conventional doses of maintenance immunosuppressant in rituximab-treated kidney transplantation (KT) are appropriate. In our previous study, decreasing mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) dose due to infection did not increase the incidence of rejection or graft failure. Based on these experiences, we developed a new protocol with a lower dose of MMF and studied its clinical outcomes in rituximab-treated KT. METHODS: We enrolled all patients who underwent ABO-incompatible or human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-sensitized living donor KT with the new immunosuppressant protocol after preconditioning with rituximab, but without splenectomy from November 2011 to May 2013. Seventy-two patients (group 1) were consecutively enrolled in this study and followed until November 2013. Patients from our previous study served as control groups. Sixty-seven patients received KT using rituximab with a conventional dose of MMF (group 2), and 87 patients received ABO compatible KT without need for rituximab (group 3). Clinical outcomes, including rejection, infection, and graft survival, were compared between the groups. The χ(2) test and Fisher’s exact test were used for categorical variables, the Student’s t-test and Mann-Whitney U test were used for continuous variables, and a log-rank test was used for mortality analysis. RESULTS: Doses of postoperative MMF (g/day) were lower in group 1 than in the other groups (1.03 ± 0.19, 1.48 ± 0.34 and 1.48 ± 0.32 g/day at 1 week, p < 0.001). Infectious complications occurred more often in groups with conventional MMF doses (group 2 and 3) than in group 1 (16.7 vs. 37.3 %, p = 0.007 and 16.7 vs. 34.5 %, p = 0.012, respectively). Notably, group 1 showed a lower incidence of cytomegalovirus infection than group 2. However, reduction in MMF dose did not increase the incidence of acute rejection (4.2, 4.5 and 10.3 %). Only one graft failure occurred in group 2 due to vessel kinking after operation. There were no significant differences in the incidence of malignancy and mortality between groups. CONCLUSIONS: A low MMF dose reduces infection without increasing rejection or graft loss and it may be appropriate to reduce the dose of MMF for rituximab-treated KT patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4670498
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46704982015-12-06 Low dose of mycophenolate mofetil is enough in desensitized kidney transplantation using rituximab Baek, Chung Hee Kim, Hyosang Yu, Hoon Shin, Eunhye Cho, Hyungjin Yang, Won Seok Han, Duck Jong Park, Su-Kil BMC Nephrol Research Article BACKGROUND: Rituximab is widely used in kidney transplantation. However, it is not clear whether the conventional doses of maintenance immunosuppressant in rituximab-treated kidney transplantation (KT) are appropriate. In our previous study, decreasing mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) dose due to infection did not increase the incidence of rejection or graft failure. Based on these experiences, we developed a new protocol with a lower dose of MMF and studied its clinical outcomes in rituximab-treated KT. METHODS: We enrolled all patients who underwent ABO-incompatible or human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-sensitized living donor KT with the new immunosuppressant protocol after preconditioning with rituximab, but without splenectomy from November 2011 to May 2013. Seventy-two patients (group 1) were consecutively enrolled in this study and followed until November 2013. Patients from our previous study served as control groups. Sixty-seven patients received KT using rituximab with a conventional dose of MMF (group 2), and 87 patients received ABO compatible KT without need for rituximab (group 3). Clinical outcomes, including rejection, infection, and graft survival, were compared between the groups. The χ(2) test and Fisher’s exact test were used for categorical variables, the Student’s t-test and Mann-Whitney U test were used for continuous variables, and a log-rank test was used for mortality analysis. RESULTS: Doses of postoperative MMF (g/day) were lower in group 1 than in the other groups (1.03 ± 0.19, 1.48 ± 0.34 and 1.48 ± 0.32 g/day at 1 week, p < 0.001). Infectious complications occurred more often in groups with conventional MMF doses (group 2 and 3) than in group 1 (16.7 vs. 37.3 %, p = 0.007 and 16.7 vs. 34.5 %, p = 0.012, respectively). Notably, group 1 showed a lower incidence of cytomegalovirus infection than group 2. However, reduction in MMF dose did not increase the incidence of acute rejection (4.2, 4.5 and 10.3 %). Only one graft failure occurred in group 2 due to vessel kinking after operation. There were no significant differences in the incidence of malignancy and mortality between groups. CONCLUSIONS: A low MMF dose reduces infection without increasing rejection or graft loss and it may be appropriate to reduce the dose of MMF for rituximab-treated KT patients. BioMed Central 2015-12-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4670498/ /pubmed/26637210 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12882-015-0201-7 Text en © Baek et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Baek, Chung Hee
Kim, Hyosang
Yu, Hoon
Shin, Eunhye
Cho, Hyungjin
Yang, Won Seok
Han, Duck Jong
Park, Su-Kil
Low dose of mycophenolate mofetil is enough in desensitized kidney transplantation using rituximab
title Low dose of mycophenolate mofetil is enough in desensitized kidney transplantation using rituximab
title_full Low dose of mycophenolate mofetil is enough in desensitized kidney transplantation using rituximab
title_fullStr Low dose of mycophenolate mofetil is enough in desensitized kidney transplantation using rituximab
title_full_unstemmed Low dose of mycophenolate mofetil is enough in desensitized kidney transplantation using rituximab
title_short Low dose of mycophenolate mofetil is enough in desensitized kidney transplantation using rituximab
title_sort low dose of mycophenolate mofetil is enough in desensitized kidney transplantation using rituximab
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4670498/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26637210
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12882-015-0201-7
work_keys_str_mv AT baekchunghee lowdoseofmycophenolatemofetilisenoughindesensitizedkidneytransplantationusingrituximab
AT kimhyosang lowdoseofmycophenolatemofetilisenoughindesensitizedkidneytransplantationusingrituximab
AT yuhoon lowdoseofmycophenolatemofetilisenoughindesensitizedkidneytransplantationusingrituximab
AT shineunhye lowdoseofmycophenolatemofetilisenoughindesensitizedkidneytransplantationusingrituximab
AT chohyungjin lowdoseofmycophenolatemofetilisenoughindesensitizedkidneytransplantationusingrituximab
AT yangwonseok lowdoseofmycophenolatemofetilisenoughindesensitizedkidneytransplantationusingrituximab
AT handuckjong lowdoseofmycophenolatemofetilisenoughindesensitizedkidneytransplantationusingrituximab
AT parksukil lowdoseofmycophenolatemofetilisenoughindesensitizedkidneytransplantationusingrituximab