Cargando…

Participant Experiences in the Environmental Determinants of Diabetes in the Young Study: Common Reasons for Withdrawing

Background. To characterize participant reasons for withdrawing from a diabetes focused longitudinal clinical observational trial (TEDDY) during the first three study years. Methods. 8677 children were recruited into the TEDDY study. At participant withdrawal staff recorded any reason parents provid...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lernmark, Barbro, Lynch, Kristian, Baxter, Judith, Roth, Roswith, Simell, Tuula, Smith, Laura, Swartling, Ulrica, Johnson, Suzanne Bennett, TEDDY Study Group
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4670659/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26682228
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/2720650
_version_ 1782404286258348032
author Lernmark, Barbro
Lynch, Kristian
Baxter, Judith
Roth, Roswith
Simell, Tuula
Smith, Laura
Swartling, Ulrica
Johnson, Suzanne Bennett
TEDDY Study Group,
author_facet Lernmark, Barbro
Lynch, Kristian
Baxter, Judith
Roth, Roswith
Simell, Tuula
Smith, Laura
Swartling, Ulrica
Johnson, Suzanne Bennett
TEDDY Study Group,
author_sort Lernmark, Barbro
collection PubMed
description Background. To characterize participant reasons for withdrawing from a diabetes focused longitudinal clinical observational trial (TEDDY) during the first three study years. Methods. 8677 children were recruited into the TEDDY study. At participant withdrawal staff recorded any reason parents provided for withdrawal. Reasons were categorized into (1) family characteristics and (2) protocol reasons. Families who informed staff of their withdrawal were classified as active withdrawals (AW); families without a final contact were considered passive withdrawals (PW). Results. Withdrawal was highest during the first study year (n = 1220). Most families were AW (n = 1549; 73.4%). PW was more common in the United States (n = 1001; 37.8%) and among young mothers (p = 0.001). The most frequent protocol characteristic was blood draw (55%) and the most common family reason was not having enough time (66%). The blood draw was more common among female participants; being too busy was more common among males. Both reasons were associated with study satisfaction. Conclusions. Results suggest that, for families of children genetically at risk for diabetes, procedures that can be painful/frightening should be used with caution. Study procedures must also be considered for the demands placed on participants. Study satisfaction should be regularly assessed as an indicator of risk for withdrawal.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4670659
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46706592015-12-17 Participant Experiences in the Environmental Determinants of Diabetes in the Young Study: Common Reasons for Withdrawing Lernmark, Barbro Lynch, Kristian Baxter, Judith Roth, Roswith Simell, Tuula Smith, Laura Swartling, Ulrica Johnson, Suzanne Bennett TEDDY Study Group, J Diabetes Res Research Article Background. To characterize participant reasons for withdrawing from a diabetes focused longitudinal clinical observational trial (TEDDY) during the first three study years. Methods. 8677 children were recruited into the TEDDY study. At participant withdrawal staff recorded any reason parents provided for withdrawal. Reasons were categorized into (1) family characteristics and (2) protocol reasons. Families who informed staff of their withdrawal were classified as active withdrawals (AW); families without a final contact were considered passive withdrawals (PW). Results. Withdrawal was highest during the first study year (n = 1220). Most families were AW (n = 1549; 73.4%). PW was more common in the United States (n = 1001; 37.8%) and among young mothers (p = 0.001). The most frequent protocol characteristic was blood draw (55%) and the most common family reason was not having enough time (66%). The blood draw was more common among female participants; being too busy was more common among males. Both reasons were associated with study satisfaction. Conclusions. Results suggest that, for families of children genetically at risk for diabetes, procedures that can be painful/frightening should be used with caution. Study procedures must also be considered for the demands placed on participants. Study satisfaction should be regularly assessed as an indicator of risk for withdrawal. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2016 2015-11-22 /pmc/articles/PMC4670659/ /pubmed/26682228 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/2720650 Text en Copyright © 2016 Barbro Lernmark et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Lernmark, Barbro
Lynch, Kristian
Baxter, Judith
Roth, Roswith
Simell, Tuula
Smith, Laura
Swartling, Ulrica
Johnson, Suzanne Bennett
TEDDY Study Group,
Participant Experiences in the Environmental Determinants of Diabetes in the Young Study: Common Reasons for Withdrawing
title Participant Experiences in the Environmental Determinants of Diabetes in the Young Study: Common Reasons for Withdrawing
title_full Participant Experiences in the Environmental Determinants of Diabetes in the Young Study: Common Reasons for Withdrawing
title_fullStr Participant Experiences in the Environmental Determinants of Diabetes in the Young Study: Common Reasons for Withdrawing
title_full_unstemmed Participant Experiences in the Environmental Determinants of Diabetes in the Young Study: Common Reasons for Withdrawing
title_short Participant Experiences in the Environmental Determinants of Diabetes in the Young Study: Common Reasons for Withdrawing
title_sort participant experiences in the environmental determinants of diabetes in the young study: common reasons for withdrawing
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4670659/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26682228
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/2720650
work_keys_str_mv AT lernmarkbarbro participantexperiencesintheenvironmentaldeterminantsofdiabetesintheyoungstudycommonreasonsforwithdrawing
AT lynchkristian participantexperiencesintheenvironmentaldeterminantsofdiabetesintheyoungstudycommonreasonsforwithdrawing
AT baxterjudith participantexperiencesintheenvironmentaldeterminantsofdiabetesintheyoungstudycommonreasonsforwithdrawing
AT rothroswith participantexperiencesintheenvironmentaldeterminantsofdiabetesintheyoungstudycommonreasonsforwithdrawing
AT simelltuula participantexperiencesintheenvironmentaldeterminantsofdiabetesintheyoungstudycommonreasonsforwithdrawing
AT smithlaura participantexperiencesintheenvironmentaldeterminantsofdiabetesintheyoungstudycommonreasonsforwithdrawing
AT swartlingulrica participantexperiencesintheenvironmentaldeterminantsofdiabetesintheyoungstudycommonreasonsforwithdrawing
AT johnsonsuzannebennett participantexperiencesintheenvironmentaldeterminantsofdiabetesintheyoungstudycommonreasonsforwithdrawing
AT teddystudygroup participantexperiencesintheenvironmentaldeterminantsofdiabetesintheyoungstudycommonreasonsforwithdrawing