Cargando…

Cleft Care UK study. Part 5: child psychosocial outcomes and satisfaction with cleft services

OBJECTIVES: To describe the impact of cleft service centralization on parental perceptions of child outcomes and satisfaction with care from the Cleft Care UK (CCUK) study and compare them to the Clinical Standards Advisory Group (CSAG) study that took place 15 years earlier. SETTING AND SAMPLE POPU...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Waylen, A, Ness, A R, Wills, A K, Persson, M, Rumsey, N, Sandy, J R
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4670713/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26567855
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ocr.12113
_version_ 1782404298304389120
author Waylen, A
Ness, A R
Wills, A K
Persson, M
Rumsey, N
Sandy, J R
author_facet Waylen, A
Ness, A R
Wills, A K
Persson, M
Rumsey, N
Sandy, J R
author_sort Waylen, A
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To describe the impact of cleft service centralization on parental perceptions of child outcomes and satisfaction with care from the Cleft Care UK (CCUK) study and compare them to the Clinical Standards Advisory Group (CSAG) study that took place 15 years earlier. SETTING AND SAMPLE POPULATION: A subgroup of respondents from a UK multicentre cross-sectional study (CCUK) of 5-year-olds born with non-syndromic unilateral cleft lip and palate. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data on parents’ perceptions of child self-confidence and their satisfaction with treatment outcomes and service provision were collected via self-report questionnaires. Data were compared with findings from the 1998 CSAG study. RESULTS: Fewer parents in the CCUK study perceived their children as having poor self-confidence than in the 1998 CSAG study (8 and 19%, respectively). At least 81% of parents report satisfaction with the child’s facial features after surgery and 98% report being satisfied with the care received. These results are similar to those reported in 1998. There is no evidence of an adverse impact on families’ ability to attend appointments at the cleft clinic following centralization. Levels of reported problems (around 30%) with attendance were similar to those reported by CSAG. CONCLUSION: Centralization of cleft services appears to have improved parental perceptions of some child outcomes but has made little difference to already high levels of parental satisfaction with cleft care services. Centralization is not associated with an increase in the proportion of families who find it difficult to attend appointments.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4670713
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46707132015-12-15 Cleft Care UK study. Part 5: child psychosocial outcomes and satisfaction with cleft services Waylen, A Ness, A R Wills, A K Persson, M Rumsey, N Sandy, J R Orthod Craniofac Res Centralisation of Cleft Care in the United Kingdom: Results of the Cleft Care Uk Study OBJECTIVES: To describe the impact of cleft service centralization on parental perceptions of child outcomes and satisfaction with care from the Cleft Care UK (CCUK) study and compare them to the Clinical Standards Advisory Group (CSAG) study that took place 15 years earlier. SETTING AND SAMPLE POPULATION: A subgroup of respondents from a UK multicentre cross-sectional study (CCUK) of 5-year-olds born with non-syndromic unilateral cleft lip and palate. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data on parents’ perceptions of child self-confidence and their satisfaction with treatment outcomes and service provision were collected via self-report questionnaires. Data were compared with findings from the 1998 CSAG study. RESULTS: Fewer parents in the CCUK study perceived their children as having poor self-confidence than in the 1998 CSAG study (8 and 19%, respectively). At least 81% of parents report satisfaction with the child’s facial features after surgery and 98% report being satisfied with the care received. These results are similar to those reported in 1998. There is no evidence of an adverse impact on families’ ability to attend appointments at the cleft clinic following centralization. Levels of reported problems (around 30%) with attendance were similar to those reported by CSAG. CONCLUSION: Centralization of cleft services appears to have improved parental perceptions of some child outcomes but has made little difference to already high levels of parental satisfaction with cleft care services. Centralization is not associated with an increase in the proportion of families who find it difficult to attend appointments. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 2015-11 2015-11-16 /pmc/articles/PMC4670713/ /pubmed/26567855 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ocr.12113 Text en Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons A/S http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Centralisation of Cleft Care in the United Kingdom: Results of the Cleft Care Uk Study
Waylen, A
Ness, A R
Wills, A K
Persson, M
Rumsey, N
Sandy, J R
Cleft Care UK study. Part 5: child psychosocial outcomes and satisfaction with cleft services
title Cleft Care UK study. Part 5: child psychosocial outcomes and satisfaction with cleft services
title_full Cleft Care UK study. Part 5: child psychosocial outcomes and satisfaction with cleft services
title_fullStr Cleft Care UK study. Part 5: child psychosocial outcomes and satisfaction with cleft services
title_full_unstemmed Cleft Care UK study. Part 5: child psychosocial outcomes and satisfaction with cleft services
title_short Cleft Care UK study. Part 5: child psychosocial outcomes and satisfaction with cleft services
title_sort cleft care uk study. part 5: child psychosocial outcomes and satisfaction with cleft services
topic Centralisation of Cleft Care in the United Kingdom: Results of the Cleft Care Uk Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4670713/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26567855
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ocr.12113
work_keys_str_mv AT waylena cleftcareukstudypart5childpsychosocialoutcomesandsatisfactionwithcleftservices
AT nessar cleftcareukstudypart5childpsychosocialoutcomesandsatisfactionwithcleftservices
AT willsak cleftcareukstudypart5childpsychosocialoutcomesandsatisfactionwithcleftservices
AT perssonm cleftcareukstudypart5childpsychosocialoutcomesandsatisfactionwithcleftservices
AT rumseyn cleftcareukstudypart5childpsychosocialoutcomesandsatisfactionwithcleftservices
AT sandyjr cleftcareukstudypart5childpsychosocialoutcomesandsatisfactionwithcleftservices