Cargando…

Standard versus accelerated riboflavin–ultraviolet corneal collagen crosslinking: Resistance against enzymatic digestion

PURPOSE: To examine the effect of standard and accelerated corneal collagen crosslinking (CXL) on corneal enzymatic resistance. SETTING: School of Optometry and Vision Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom. DESIGN: Experimental study. METHODS: Sixty-six enucleated porcine eyes (with...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Aldahlawi, Nada H., Hayes, Sally, O'Brart, David P.S., Meek, Keith M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4670830/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26603408
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2015.10.004
_version_ 1782404307698581504
author Aldahlawi, Nada H.
Hayes, Sally
O'Brart, David P.S.
Meek, Keith M.
author_facet Aldahlawi, Nada H.
Hayes, Sally
O'Brart, David P.S.
Meek, Keith M.
author_sort Aldahlawi, Nada H.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To examine the effect of standard and accelerated corneal collagen crosslinking (CXL) on corneal enzymatic resistance. SETTING: School of Optometry and Vision Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom. DESIGN: Experimental study. METHODS: Sixty-six enucleated porcine eyes (with corneal epithelium removed) were assigned to 6 groups. Group 1 remained untreated, group 2 received dextran eyedrops, and groups 3 to 6 received riboflavin/dextran eyedrops. Group 4 had standard CXL (3 mW/cm(2) ultraviolet-A for 30 minutes), whereas groups 5 and 6 received accelerated CXL (9 mW/cm(2) for 10 minutes and 18 mW/cm(2) for 5 minutes, respectively). Trephined central 8.0 mm buttons from each cornea underwent pepsin digestion. Corneal diameter was measured daily, and the dry weight of 5 samples from each group was recorded after 12 days of digestion. RESULTS: All CXL groups (4 to 6) took longer to digest and had a greater dry weight at 12 days (P < .0001) than the nonirradiated groups (1 to 3) (P < .0001). The time taken for complete digestion to occur did not differ between the standard and accelerated CXL groups, but the dry weights at 12 days showed significant differences between treatments: standard CXL 3 mW > accelerated CXL 9 mW > accelerated CXL 18 mW (P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: Standard and accelerated CXL both increased corneal enzymatic resistance; however, the amount of CXL might be less when accelerated CXL is used. The precise amount of CXL needed to prevent disease progression is not yet known. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4670830
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Elsevier Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46708302015-12-23 Standard versus accelerated riboflavin–ultraviolet corneal collagen crosslinking: Resistance against enzymatic digestion Aldahlawi, Nada H. Hayes, Sally O'Brart, David P.S. Meek, Keith M. J Cataract Refract Surg Laboratory Science PURPOSE: To examine the effect of standard and accelerated corneal collagen crosslinking (CXL) on corneal enzymatic resistance. SETTING: School of Optometry and Vision Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom. DESIGN: Experimental study. METHODS: Sixty-six enucleated porcine eyes (with corneal epithelium removed) were assigned to 6 groups. Group 1 remained untreated, group 2 received dextran eyedrops, and groups 3 to 6 received riboflavin/dextran eyedrops. Group 4 had standard CXL (3 mW/cm(2) ultraviolet-A for 30 minutes), whereas groups 5 and 6 received accelerated CXL (9 mW/cm(2) for 10 minutes and 18 mW/cm(2) for 5 minutes, respectively). Trephined central 8.0 mm buttons from each cornea underwent pepsin digestion. Corneal diameter was measured daily, and the dry weight of 5 samples from each group was recorded after 12 days of digestion. RESULTS: All CXL groups (4 to 6) took longer to digest and had a greater dry weight at 12 days (P < .0001) than the nonirradiated groups (1 to 3) (P < .0001). The time taken for complete digestion to occur did not differ between the standard and accelerated CXL groups, but the dry weights at 12 days showed significant differences between treatments: standard CXL 3 mW > accelerated CXL 9 mW > accelerated CXL 18 mW (P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: Standard and accelerated CXL both increased corneal enzymatic resistance; however, the amount of CXL might be less when accelerated CXL is used. The precise amount of CXL needed to prevent disease progression is not yet known. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned. Elsevier Science 2015-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4670830/ /pubmed/26603408 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2015.10.004 Text en © 2015 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Laboratory Science
Aldahlawi, Nada H.
Hayes, Sally
O'Brart, David P.S.
Meek, Keith M.
Standard versus accelerated riboflavin–ultraviolet corneal collagen crosslinking: Resistance against enzymatic digestion
title Standard versus accelerated riboflavin–ultraviolet corneal collagen crosslinking: Resistance against enzymatic digestion
title_full Standard versus accelerated riboflavin–ultraviolet corneal collagen crosslinking: Resistance against enzymatic digestion
title_fullStr Standard versus accelerated riboflavin–ultraviolet corneal collagen crosslinking: Resistance against enzymatic digestion
title_full_unstemmed Standard versus accelerated riboflavin–ultraviolet corneal collagen crosslinking: Resistance against enzymatic digestion
title_short Standard versus accelerated riboflavin–ultraviolet corneal collagen crosslinking: Resistance against enzymatic digestion
title_sort standard versus accelerated riboflavin–ultraviolet corneal collagen crosslinking: resistance against enzymatic digestion
topic Laboratory Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4670830/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26603408
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2015.10.004
work_keys_str_mv AT aldahlawinadah standardversusacceleratedriboflavinultravioletcornealcollagencrosslinkingresistanceagainstenzymaticdigestion
AT hayessally standardversusacceleratedriboflavinultravioletcornealcollagencrosslinkingresistanceagainstenzymaticdigestion
AT obrartdavidps standardversusacceleratedriboflavinultravioletcornealcollagencrosslinkingresistanceagainstenzymaticdigestion
AT meekkeithm standardversusacceleratedriboflavinultravioletcornealcollagencrosslinkingresistanceagainstenzymaticdigestion