Cargando…
Open laminoforaminotomy: A lost art?
BACKGROUND: Open cervical laminoforaminotomy (CLF) provides safe and effective decompression/excision of lateral/foraminal disc herniations/spurs contributing to nerve root compression. CLF's advantages over anterior cervical discectomy/fusion (ACDF) include the lack of risk to anterior structu...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4671142/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26693388 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2152-7806.170435 |
_version_ | 1782404358065881088 |
---|---|
author | Epstein, Nancy E. |
author_facet | Epstein, Nancy E. |
author_sort | Epstein, Nancy E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Open cervical laminoforaminotomy (CLF) provides safe and effective decompression/excision of lateral/foraminal disc herniations/spurs contributing to nerve root compression. CLF's advantages over anterior cervical discectomy/fusion (ACDF) include the lack of risk to anterior structures (esophagus, trachea, carotid, and recurrent laryngeal nerve) and the avoidance of a fusion. Further, advantages over minimally invasive surgery CLF (MIS CLF) include a lower incidence of dural tears, infections, and neural injury. Furthermore, complications are now more often reported in medicolegal suits rather than the spinal surgical literature. METHODS: Here, in a select review of the spinal literature in which we specifically focused on the benefits, risks, and complication of open CLF versus the various MIS CLS techniques. RESULTS: Open CLF is a unique posterior cervical surgical technique that is technically demanding. When using an MIS CLF approach that provides limited visualization and maneuverability while incurring greater morbidity (e.g., risks more dural tears, infection, and neural damage). CONCLUSIONS: Why not utilize open CLF, adequately and safely, to decompress lateral/foraminally compromised cervical nerve roots, and avoid the risks of MIS CLF or ACDF? Presently, too many spine surgeons automatically choose MIS CLF or ACDF over open CLF; is this because it is a “lost art”? |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4671142 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46711422015-12-21 Open laminoforaminotomy: A lost art? Epstein, Nancy E. Surg Neurol Int Surgical Neurology International: Spine BACKGROUND: Open cervical laminoforaminotomy (CLF) provides safe and effective decompression/excision of lateral/foraminal disc herniations/spurs contributing to nerve root compression. CLF's advantages over anterior cervical discectomy/fusion (ACDF) include the lack of risk to anterior structures (esophagus, trachea, carotid, and recurrent laryngeal nerve) and the avoidance of a fusion. Further, advantages over minimally invasive surgery CLF (MIS CLF) include a lower incidence of dural tears, infections, and neural injury. Furthermore, complications are now more often reported in medicolegal suits rather than the spinal surgical literature. METHODS: Here, in a select review of the spinal literature in which we specifically focused on the benefits, risks, and complication of open CLF versus the various MIS CLS techniques. RESULTS: Open CLF is a unique posterior cervical surgical technique that is technically demanding. When using an MIS CLF approach that provides limited visualization and maneuverability while incurring greater morbidity (e.g., risks more dural tears, infection, and neural damage). CONCLUSIONS: Why not utilize open CLF, adequately and safely, to decompress lateral/foraminally compromised cervical nerve roots, and avoid the risks of MIS CLF or ACDF? Presently, too many spine surgeons automatically choose MIS CLF or ACDF over open CLF; is this because it is a “lost art”? Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015-11-25 /pmc/articles/PMC4671142/ /pubmed/26693388 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2152-7806.170435 Text en Copyright: © 2015 Surgical Neurology International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Surgical Neurology International: Spine Epstein, Nancy E. Open laminoforaminotomy: A lost art? |
title | Open laminoforaminotomy: A lost art? |
title_full | Open laminoforaminotomy: A lost art? |
title_fullStr | Open laminoforaminotomy: A lost art? |
title_full_unstemmed | Open laminoforaminotomy: A lost art? |
title_short | Open laminoforaminotomy: A lost art? |
title_sort | open laminoforaminotomy: a lost art? |
topic | Surgical Neurology International: Spine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4671142/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26693388 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2152-7806.170435 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT epsteinnancye openlaminoforaminotomyalostart |