Cargando…

A Unified Probabilistic Framework for Dose–Response Assessment of Human Health Effects

BACKGROUND: When chemical health hazards have been identified, probabilistic dose–response assessment (“hazard characterization”) quantifies uncertainty and/or variability in toxicity as a function of human exposure. Existing probabilistic approaches differ for different types of endpoints or modes-...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chiu, Weihsueh A., Slob, Wout
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4671238/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26006063
http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1409385
_version_ 1782404376823857152
author Chiu, Weihsueh A.
Slob, Wout
author_facet Chiu, Weihsueh A.
Slob, Wout
author_sort Chiu, Weihsueh A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: When chemical health hazards have been identified, probabilistic dose–response assessment (“hazard characterization”) quantifies uncertainty and/or variability in toxicity as a function of human exposure. Existing probabilistic approaches differ for different types of endpoints or modes-of-action, lacking a unifying framework. OBJECTIVES: We developed a unified framework for probabilistic dose–response assessment. METHODS: We established a framework based on four principles: a) individual and population dose responses are distinct; b) dose–response relationships for all (including quantal) endpoints can be recast as relating to an underlying continuous measure of response at the individual level; c) for effects relevant to humans, “effect metrics” can be specified to define “toxicologically equivalent” sizes for this underlying individual response; and d) dose–response assessment requires making adjustments and accounting for uncertainty and variability. We then derived a step-by-step probabilistic approach for dose–response assessment of animal toxicology data similar to how nonprobabilistic reference doses are derived, illustrating the approach with example non-cancer and cancer datasets. RESULTS: Probabilistically derived exposure limits are based on estimating a “target human dose” (HD(M)(I)), which requires risk management–informed choices for the magnitude (M) of individual effect being protected against, the remaining incidence (I) of individuals with effects ≥ M in the population, and the percent confidence. In the example datasets, probabilistically derived 90% confidence intervals for HD(M)(I) values span a 40- to 60-fold range, where I = 1% of the population experiences ≥ M = 1%–10% effect sizes. CONCLUSIONS: Although some implementation challenges remain, this unified probabilistic framework can provide substantially more complete and transparent characterization of chemical hazards and support better-informed risk management decisions. CITATION: Chiu WA, Slob W. 2015. A unified probabilistic framework for dose–response assessment of human health effects. Environ Health Perspect 123:1241–1254; http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1409385
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4671238
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46712382015-12-16 A Unified Probabilistic Framework for Dose–Response Assessment of Human Health Effects Chiu, Weihsueh A. Slob, Wout Environ Health Perspect Review BACKGROUND: When chemical health hazards have been identified, probabilistic dose–response assessment (“hazard characterization”) quantifies uncertainty and/or variability in toxicity as a function of human exposure. Existing probabilistic approaches differ for different types of endpoints or modes-of-action, lacking a unifying framework. OBJECTIVES: We developed a unified framework for probabilistic dose–response assessment. METHODS: We established a framework based on four principles: a) individual and population dose responses are distinct; b) dose–response relationships for all (including quantal) endpoints can be recast as relating to an underlying continuous measure of response at the individual level; c) for effects relevant to humans, “effect metrics” can be specified to define “toxicologically equivalent” sizes for this underlying individual response; and d) dose–response assessment requires making adjustments and accounting for uncertainty and variability. We then derived a step-by-step probabilistic approach for dose–response assessment of animal toxicology data similar to how nonprobabilistic reference doses are derived, illustrating the approach with example non-cancer and cancer datasets. RESULTS: Probabilistically derived exposure limits are based on estimating a “target human dose” (HD(M)(I)), which requires risk management–informed choices for the magnitude (M) of individual effect being protected against, the remaining incidence (I) of individuals with effects ≥ M in the population, and the percent confidence. In the example datasets, probabilistically derived 90% confidence intervals for HD(M)(I) values span a 40- to 60-fold range, where I = 1% of the population experiences ≥ M = 1%–10% effect sizes. CONCLUSIONS: Although some implementation challenges remain, this unified probabilistic framework can provide substantially more complete and transparent characterization of chemical hazards and support better-informed risk management decisions. CITATION: Chiu WA, Slob W. 2015. A unified probabilistic framework for dose–response assessment of human health effects. Environ Health Perspect 123:1241–1254; http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1409385 National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences 2015-05-22 2015-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4671238/ /pubmed/26006063 http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1409385 Text en http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/mark/1.0/ Publication of EHP lies in the public domain and is therefore without copyright. All text from EHP may be reprinted freely. Use of materials published in EHP should be acknowledged (for example, “Reproduced with permission from Environmental Health Perspectives”); pertinent reference information should be provided for the article from which the material was reproduced. Articles from EHP, especially the News section, may contain photographs or illustrations copyrighted by other commercial organizations or individuals that may not be used without obtaining prior approval from the holder of the copyright.
spellingShingle Review
Chiu, Weihsueh A.
Slob, Wout
A Unified Probabilistic Framework for Dose–Response Assessment of Human Health Effects
title A Unified Probabilistic Framework for Dose–Response Assessment of Human Health Effects
title_full A Unified Probabilistic Framework for Dose–Response Assessment of Human Health Effects
title_fullStr A Unified Probabilistic Framework for Dose–Response Assessment of Human Health Effects
title_full_unstemmed A Unified Probabilistic Framework for Dose–Response Assessment of Human Health Effects
title_short A Unified Probabilistic Framework for Dose–Response Assessment of Human Health Effects
title_sort unified probabilistic framework for dose–response assessment of human health effects
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4671238/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26006063
http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1409385
work_keys_str_mv AT chiuweihsueha aunifiedprobabilisticframeworkfordoseresponseassessmentofhumanhealtheffects
AT slobwout aunifiedprobabilisticframeworkfordoseresponseassessmentofhumanhealtheffects
AT chiuweihsueha unifiedprobabilisticframeworkfordoseresponseassessmentofhumanhealtheffects
AT slobwout unifiedprobabilisticframeworkfordoseresponseassessmentofhumanhealtheffects