Cargando…
A Unified Probabilistic Framework for Dose–Response Assessment of Human Health Effects
BACKGROUND: When chemical health hazards have been identified, probabilistic dose–response assessment (“hazard characterization”) quantifies uncertainty and/or variability in toxicity as a function of human exposure. Existing probabilistic approaches differ for different types of endpoints or modes-...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4671238/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26006063 http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1409385 |
_version_ | 1782404376823857152 |
---|---|
author | Chiu, Weihsueh A. Slob, Wout |
author_facet | Chiu, Weihsueh A. Slob, Wout |
author_sort | Chiu, Weihsueh A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: When chemical health hazards have been identified, probabilistic dose–response assessment (“hazard characterization”) quantifies uncertainty and/or variability in toxicity as a function of human exposure. Existing probabilistic approaches differ for different types of endpoints or modes-of-action, lacking a unifying framework. OBJECTIVES: We developed a unified framework for probabilistic dose–response assessment. METHODS: We established a framework based on four principles: a) individual and population dose responses are distinct; b) dose–response relationships for all (including quantal) endpoints can be recast as relating to an underlying continuous measure of response at the individual level; c) for effects relevant to humans, “effect metrics” can be specified to define “toxicologically equivalent” sizes for this underlying individual response; and d) dose–response assessment requires making adjustments and accounting for uncertainty and variability. We then derived a step-by-step probabilistic approach for dose–response assessment of animal toxicology data similar to how nonprobabilistic reference doses are derived, illustrating the approach with example non-cancer and cancer datasets. RESULTS: Probabilistically derived exposure limits are based on estimating a “target human dose” (HD(M)(I)), which requires risk management–informed choices for the magnitude (M) of individual effect being protected against, the remaining incidence (I) of individuals with effects ≥ M in the population, and the percent confidence. In the example datasets, probabilistically derived 90% confidence intervals for HD(M)(I) values span a 40- to 60-fold range, where I = 1% of the population experiences ≥ M = 1%–10% effect sizes. CONCLUSIONS: Although some implementation challenges remain, this unified probabilistic framework can provide substantially more complete and transparent characterization of chemical hazards and support better-informed risk management decisions. CITATION: Chiu WA, Slob W. 2015. A unified probabilistic framework for dose–response assessment of human health effects. Environ Health Perspect 123:1241–1254; http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1409385 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4671238 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46712382015-12-16 A Unified Probabilistic Framework for Dose–Response Assessment of Human Health Effects Chiu, Weihsueh A. Slob, Wout Environ Health Perspect Review BACKGROUND: When chemical health hazards have been identified, probabilistic dose–response assessment (“hazard characterization”) quantifies uncertainty and/or variability in toxicity as a function of human exposure. Existing probabilistic approaches differ for different types of endpoints or modes-of-action, lacking a unifying framework. OBJECTIVES: We developed a unified framework for probabilistic dose–response assessment. METHODS: We established a framework based on four principles: a) individual and population dose responses are distinct; b) dose–response relationships for all (including quantal) endpoints can be recast as relating to an underlying continuous measure of response at the individual level; c) for effects relevant to humans, “effect metrics” can be specified to define “toxicologically equivalent” sizes for this underlying individual response; and d) dose–response assessment requires making adjustments and accounting for uncertainty and variability. We then derived a step-by-step probabilistic approach for dose–response assessment of animal toxicology data similar to how nonprobabilistic reference doses are derived, illustrating the approach with example non-cancer and cancer datasets. RESULTS: Probabilistically derived exposure limits are based on estimating a “target human dose” (HD(M)(I)), which requires risk management–informed choices for the magnitude (M) of individual effect being protected against, the remaining incidence (I) of individuals with effects ≥ M in the population, and the percent confidence. In the example datasets, probabilistically derived 90% confidence intervals for HD(M)(I) values span a 40- to 60-fold range, where I = 1% of the population experiences ≥ M = 1%–10% effect sizes. CONCLUSIONS: Although some implementation challenges remain, this unified probabilistic framework can provide substantially more complete and transparent characterization of chemical hazards and support better-informed risk management decisions. CITATION: Chiu WA, Slob W. 2015. A unified probabilistic framework for dose–response assessment of human health effects. Environ Health Perspect 123:1241–1254; http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1409385 National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences 2015-05-22 2015-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4671238/ /pubmed/26006063 http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1409385 Text en http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/mark/1.0/ Publication of EHP lies in the public domain and is therefore without copyright. All text from EHP may be reprinted freely. Use of materials published in EHP should be acknowledged (for example, “Reproduced with permission from Environmental Health Perspectives”); pertinent reference information should be provided for the article from which the material was reproduced. Articles from EHP, especially the News section, may contain photographs or illustrations copyrighted by other commercial organizations or individuals that may not be used without obtaining prior approval from the holder of the copyright. |
spellingShingle | Review Chiu, Weihsueh A. Slob, Wout A Unified Probabilistic Framework for Dose–Response Assessment of Human Health Effects |
title | A Unified Probabilistic Framework for Dose–Response Assessment of Human Health Effects |
title_full | A Unified Probabilistic Framework for Dose–Response Assessment of Human Health Effects |
title_fullStr | A Unified Probabilistic Framework for Dose–Response Assessment of Human Health Effects |
title_full_unstemmed | A Unified Probabilistic Framework for Dose–Response Assessment of Human Health Effects |
title_short | A Unified Probabilistic Framework for Dose–Response Assessment of Human Health Effects |
title_sort | unified probabilistic framework for dose–response assessment of human health effects |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4671238/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26006063 http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1409385 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chiuweihsueha aunifiedprobabilisticframeworkfordoseresponseassessmentofhumanhealtheffects AT slobwout aunifiedprobabilisticframeworkfordoseresponseassessmentofhumanhealtheffects AT chiuweihsueha unifiedprobabilisticframeworkfordoseresponseassessmentofhumanhealtheffects AT slobwout unifiedprobabilisticframeworkfordoseresponseassessmentofhumanhealtheffects |