Cargando…

Screening for Chemical Contributions to Breast Cancer Risk: A Case Study for Chemical Safety Evaluation

BACKGROUND: Current approaches to chemical screening, prioritization, and assessment are being reenvisioned, driven by innovations in chemical safety testing, new chemical regulations, and demand for information on human and environmental impacts of chemicals. To conceptualize these changes through...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schwarzman, Megan R., Ackerman, Janet M., Dairkee, Shanaz H., Fenton, Suzanne E., Johnson, Dale, Navarro, Kathleen M., Osborne, Gwendolyn, Rudel, Ruthann A., Solomon, Gina M., Zeise, Lauren, Janssen, Sarah
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4671249/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26032647
http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1408337
_version_ 1782404379297447936
author Schwarzman, Megan R.
Ackerman, Janet M.
Dairkee, Shanaz H.
Fenton, Suzanne E.
Johnson, Dale
Navarro, Kathleen M.
Osborne, Gwendolyn
Rudel, Ruthann A.
Solomon, Gina M.
Zeise, Lauren
Janssen, Sarah
author_facet Schwarzman, Megan R.
Ackerman, Janet M.
Dairkee, Shanaz H.
Fenton, Suzanne E.
Johnson, Dale
Navarro, Kathleen M.
Osborne, Gwendolyn
Rudel, Ruthann A.
Solomon, Gina M.
Zeise, Lauren
Janssen, Sarah
author_sort Schwarzman, Megan R.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Current approaches to chemical screening, prioritization, and assessment are being reenvisioned, driven by innovations in chemical safety testing, new chemical regulations, and demand for information on human and environmental impacts of chemicals. To conceptualize these changes through the lens of a prevalent disease, the Breast Cancer and Chemicals Policy project convened an interdisciplinary expert panel to investigate methods for identifying chemicals that may increase breast cancer risk. METHODS: Based on a review of current evidence, the panel identified key biological processes whose perturbation may alter breast cancer risk. We identified corresponding assays to develop the Hazard Identification Approach for Breast Carcinogens (HIA-BC), a method for detecting chemicals that may raise breast cancer risk. Finally, we conducted a literature-based pilot test of the HIA-BC. RESULTS: The HIA-BC identifies assays capable of detecting alterations to biological processes relevant to breast cancer, including cellular and molecular events, tissue changes, and factors that alter susceptibility. In the pilot test of the HIA-BC, chemicals associated with breast cancer all demonstrated genotoxic or endocrine activity, but not necessarily both. Significant data gaps persist. CONCLUSIONS: This approach could inform the development of toxicity testing that targets mechanisms relevant to breast cancer, providing a basis for identifying safer chemicals. The study identified important end points not currently evaluated by federal testing programs, including altered mammary gland development, Her2 activation, progesterone receptor activity, prolactin effects, and aspects of estrogen receptor β activity. This approach could be extended to identify the biological processes and screening methods relevant for other common diseases. CITATION: Schwarzman MR, Ackerman JM, Dairkee SH, Fenton SE, Johnson D, Navarro KM, Osborne G, Rudel RA, Solomon GM, Zeise L, Janssen S. 2015. Screening for chemical contributions to breast cancer risk: a case study for chemical safety evaluation. Environ Health Perspect 123:1255–1264; http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1408337
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4671249
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46712492015-12-16 Screening for Chemical Contributions to Breast Cancer Risk: A Case Study for Chemical Safety Evaluation Schwarzman, Megan R. Ackerman, Janet M. Dairkee, Shanaz H. Fenton, Suzanne E. Johnson, Dale Navarro, Kathleen M. Osborne, Gwendolyn Rudel, Ruthann A. Solomon, Gina M. Zeise, Lauren Janssen, Sarah Environ Health Perspect Review BACKGROUND: Current approaches to chemical screening, prioritization, and assessment are being reenvisioned, driven by innovations in chemical safety testing, new chemical regulations, and demand for information on human and environmental impacts of chemicals. To conceptualize these changes through the lens of a prevalent disease, the Breast Cancer and Chemicals Policy project convened an interdisciplinary expert panel to investigate methods for identifying chemicals that may increase breast cancer risk. METHODS: Based on a review of current evidence, the panel identified key biological processes whose perturbation may alter breast cancer risk. We identified corresponding assays to develop the Hazard Identification Approach for Breast Carcinogens (HIA-BC), a method for detecting chemicals that may raise breast cancer risk. Finally, we conducted a literature-based pilot test of the HIA-BC. RESULTS: The HIA-BC identifies assays capable of detecting alterations to biological processes relevant to breast cancer, including cellular and molecular events, tissue changes, and factors that alter susceptibility. In the pilot test of the HIA-BC, chemicals associated with breast cancer all demonstrated genotoxic or endocrine activity, but not necessarily both. Significant data gaps persist. CONCLUSIONS: This approach could inform the development of toxicity testing that targets mechanisms relevant to breast cancer, providing a basis for identifying safer chemicals. The study identified important end points not currently evaluated by federal testing programs, including altered mammary gland development, Her2 activation, progesterone receptor activity, prolactin effects, and aspects of estrogen receptor β activity. This approach could be extended to identify the biological processes and screening methods relevant for other common diseases. CITATION: Schwarzman MR, Ackerman JM, Dairkee SH, Fenton SE, Johnson D, Navarro KM, Osborne G, Rudel RA, Solomon GM, Zeise L, Janssen S. 2015. Screening for chemical contributions to breast cancer risk: a case study for chemical safety evaluation. Environ Health Perspect 123:1255–1264; http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1408337 National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences 2015-06-02 2015-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4671249/ /pubmed/26032647 http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1408337 Text en http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/mark/1.0/ Publication of EHP lies in the public domain and is therefore without copyright. All text from EHP may be reprinted freely. Use of materials published in EHP should be acknowledged (for example, “Reproduced with permission from Environmental Health Perspectives”); pertinent reference information should be provided for the article from which the material was reproduced. Articles from EHP, especially the News section, may contain photographs or illustrations copyrighted by other commercial organizations or individuals that may not be used without obtaining prior approval from the holder of the copyright.
spellingShingle Review
Schwarzman, Megan R.
Ackerman, Janet M.
Dairkee, Shanaz H.
Fenton, Suzanne E.
Johnson, Dale
Navarro, Kathleen M.
Osborne, Gwendolyn
Rudel, Ruthann A.
Solomon, Gina M.
Zeise, Lauren
Janssen, Sarah
Screening for Chemical Contributions to Breast Cancer Risk: A Case Study for Chemical Safety Evaluation
title Screening for Chemical Contributions to Breast Cancer Risk: A Case Study for Chemical Safety Evaluation
title_full Screening for Chemical Contributions to Breast Cancer Risk: A Case Study for Chemical Safety Evaluation
title_fullStr Screening for Chemical Contributions to Breast Cancer Risk: A Case Study for Chemical Safety Evaluation
title_full_unstemmed Screening for Chemical Contributions to Breast Cancer Risk: A Case Study for Chemical Safety Evaluation
title_short Screening for Chemical Contributions to Breast Cancer Risk: A Case Study for Chemical Safety Evaluation
title_sort screening for chemical contributions to breast cancer risk: a case study for chemical safety evaluation
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4671249/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26032647
http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1408337
work_keys_str_mv AT schwarzmanmeganr screeningforchemicalcontributionstobreastcancerriskacasestudyforchemicalsafetyevaluation
AT ackermanjanetm screeningforchemicalcontributionstobreastcancerriskacasestudyforchemicalsafetyevaluation
AT dairkeeshanazh screeningforchemicalcontributionstobreastcancerriskacasestudyforchemicalsafetyevaluation
AT fentonsuzannee screeningforchemicalcontributionstobreastcancerriskacasestudyforchemicalsafetyevaluation
AT johnsondale screeningforchemicalcontributionstobreastcancerriskacasestudyforchemicalsafetyevaluation
AT navarrokathleenm screeningforchemicalcontributionstobreastcancerriskacasestudyforchemicalsafetyevaluation
AT osbornegwendolyn screeningforchemicalcontributionstobreastcancerriskacasestudyforchemicalsafetyevaluation
AT rudelruthanna screeningforchemicalcontributionstobreastcancerriskacasestudyforchemicalsafetyevaluation
AT solomonginam screeningforchemicalcontributionstobreastcancerriskacasestudyforchemicalsafetyevaluation
AT zeiselauren screeningforchemicalcontributionstobreastcancerriskacasestudyforchemicalsafetyevaluation
AT janssensarah screeningforchemicalcontributionstobreastcancerriskacasestudyforchemicalsafetyevaluation