Cargando…

Mixed methods evaluation of targeted selective anthelmintic treatment by resource-poor smallholder goat farmers in Botswana

Due to the threat of anthelmintic resistance, livestock farmers worldwide are encouraged to selectively apply treatments against gastrointestinal nematodes (GINs). Targeted selective treatment (TST) of individual animals would be especially useful for smallholder farmers in low-income economies, whe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Walker, Josephine G., Ofithile, Mphoeng, Tavolaro, F. Marina, van Wyk, Jan A., Evans, Kate, Morgan, Eric R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4671485/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26493540
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2015.10.006
_version_ 1782404406083321856
author Walker, Josephine G.
Ofithile, Mphoeng
Tavolaro, F. Marina
van Wyk, Jan A.
Evans, Kate
Morgan, Eric R.
author_facet Walker, Josephine G.
Ofithile, Mphoeng
Tavolaro, F. Marina
van Wyk, Jan A.
Evans, Kate
Morgan, Eric R.
author_sort Walker, Josephine G.
collection PubMed
description Due to the threat of anthelmintic resistance, livestock farmers worldwide are encouraged to selectively apply treatments against gastrointestinal nematodes (GINs). Targeted selective treatment (TST) of individual animals would be especially useful for smallholder farmers in low-income economies, where cost-effective and sustainable intervention strategies will improve livestock productivity and food security. Supporting research has focused mainly on refining technical indicators for treatment, and much less on factors influencing uptake and effectiveness. We used a mixed method approach, whereby qualitative and quantitative approaches are combined, to develop, implement and validate a TST system for GINs in small ruminants, most commonly goats, among smallholder farmers in the Makgadikgadi Pans region of Botswana, and to seek better understanding of system performance within a cultural context. After the first six months of the study, 42 out of 47 enrolled farmers were followed up; 52% had monitored their animals using the taught inspection criteria and 26% applied TST during this phase. Uptake level showed little correlation with farmer characteristics, such as literacy and size of farm. Herd health significantly improved in those herds where anthelmintic treatment was applied: anaemia, as assessed using the five-point FAMACHA(©) scale, was 0.44–0.69 points better (95% confidence interval) and body condition score was 0.18–0.36 points better (95% C.I., five-point scale) in treated compared with untreated herds. Only targeting individuals in greatest need led to similar health improvements compared to treating the entire herd, leading to dose savings ranging from 36% to 97%. This study demonstrates that TST against nematodes can be implemented effectively by resource-poor farmers using a community-led approach. The use of mixed methods provides a promising system to integrate technical and social aspects of TST programmes for maximum uptake and effect.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4671485
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46714852015-12-23 Mixed methods evaluation of targeted selective anthelmintic treatment by resource-poor smallholder goat farmers in Botswana Walker, Josephine G. Ofithile, Mphoeng Tavolaro, F. Marina van Wyk, Jan A. Evans, Kate Morgan, Eric R. Vet Parasitol Article Due to the threat of anthelmintic resistance, livestock farmers worldwide are encouraged to selectively apply treatments against gastrointestinal nematodes (GINs). Targeted selective treatment (TST) of individual animals would be especially useful for smallholder farmers in low-income economies, where cost-effective and sustainable intervention strategies will improve livestock productivity and food security. Supporting research has focused mainly on refining technical indicators for treatment, and much less on factors influencing uptake and effectiveness. We used a mixed method approach, whereby qualitative and quantitative approaches are combined, to develop, implement and validate a TST system for GINs in small ruminants, most commonly goats, among smallholder farmers in the Makgadikgadi Pans region of Botswana, and to seek better understanding of system performance within a cultural context. After the first six months of the study, 42 out of 47 enrolled farmers were followed up; 52% had monitored their animals using the taught inspection criteria and 26% applied TST during this phase. Uptake level showed little correlation with farmer characteristics, such as literacy and size of farm. Herd health significantly improved in those herds where anthelmintic treatment was applied: anaemia, as assessed using the five-point FAMACHA(©) scale, was 0.44–0.69 points better (95% confidence interval) and body condition score was 0.18–0.36 points better (95% C.I., five-point scale) in treated compared with untreated herds. Only targeting individuals in greatest need led to similar health improvements compared to treating the entire herd, leading to dose savings ranging from 36% to 97%. This study demonstrates that TST against nematodes can be implemented effectively by resource-poor farmers using a community-led approach. The use of mixed methods provides a promising system to integrate technical and social aspects of TST programmes for maximum uptake and effect. Elsevier 2015-11-30 /pmc/articles/PMC4671485/ /pubmed/26493540 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2015.10.006 Text en © 2015 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Walker, Josephine G.
Ofithile, Mphoeng
Tavolaro, F. Marina
van Wyk, Jan A.
Evans, Kate
Morgan, Eric R.
Mixed methods evaluation of targeted selective anthelmintic treatment by resource-poor smallholder goat farmers in Botswana
title Mixed methods evaluation of targeted selective anthelmintic treatment by resource-poor smallholder goat farmers in Botswana
title_full Mixed methods evaluation of targeted selective anthelmintic treatment by resource-poor smallholder goat farmers in Botswana
title_fullStr Mixed methods evaluation of targeted selective anthelmintic treatment by resource-poor smallholder goat farmers in Botswana
title_full_unstemmed Mixed methods evaluation of targeted selective anthelmintic treatment by resource-poor smallholder goat farmers in Botswana
title_short Mixed methods evaluation of targeted selective anthelmintic treatment by resource-poor smallholder goat farmers in Botswana
title_sort mixed methods evaluation of targeted selective anthelmintic treatment by resource-poor smallholder goat farmers in botswana
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4671485/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26493540
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2015.10.006
work_keys_str_mv AT walkerjosephineg mixedmethodsevaluationoftargetedselectiveanthelmintictreatmentbyresourcepoorsmallholdergoatfarmersinbotswana
AT ofithilemphoeng mixedmethodsevaluationoftargetedselectiveanthelmintictreatmentbyresourcepoorsmallholdergoatfarmersinbotswana
AT tavolarofmarina mixedmethodsevaluationoftargetedselectiveanthelmintictreatmentbyresourcepoorsmallholdergoatfarmersinbotswana
AT vanwykjana mixedmethodsevaluationoftargetedselectiveanthelmintictreatmentbyresourcepoorsmallholdergoatfarmersinbotswana
AT evanskate mixedmethodsevaluationoftargetedselectiveanthelmintictreatmentbyresourcepoorsmallholdergoatfarmersinbotswana
AT morganericr mixedmethodsevaluationoftargetedselectiveanthelmintictreatmentbyresourcepoorsmallholdergoatfarmersinbotswana