Cargando…

The Effects of Electrical and Optical Stimulation of Midbrain Dopaminergic Neurons on Rat 50-kHz Ultrasonic Vocalizations

Rationale: Adult rats emit ultrasonic vocalizations (USVs) at around 50-kHz; these commonly occur in contexts that putatively engender positive affect. While several reports indicate that dopaminergic (DAergic) transmission plays a role in the emission of 50-kHz calls, the pharmacological evidence i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Scardochio, Tina, Trujillo-Pisanty, Ivan, Conover, Kent, Shizgal, Peter, Clarke, Paul B. S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4672056/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26696851
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00331
_version_ 1782404493978107904
author Scardochio, Tina
Trujillo-Pisanty, Ivan
Conover, Kent
Shizgal, Peter
Clarke, Paul B. S.
author_facet Scardochio, Tina
Trujillo-Pisanty, Ivan
Conover, Kent
Shizgal, Peter
Clarke, Paul B. S.
author_sort Scardochio, Tina
collection PubMed
description Rationale: Adult rats emit ultrasonic vocalizations (USVs) at around 50-kHz; these commonly occur in contexts that putatively engender positive affect. While several reports indicate that dopaminergic (DAergic) transmission plays a role in the emission of 50-kHz calls, the pharmacological evidence is mixed. Different modes of dopamine (DA) release (i.e., tonic and phasic) could potentially explain this discrepancy. Objective: To investigate the potential role of phasic DA release in 50-kHz call emission. Methods: In Experiment 1, USVs were recorded in adult male rats following unexpected electrical stimulation of the medial forebrain bundle (MFB). In parallel, phasic DA release in the nucleus accumbens (NAcc) was recorded using fast-scan cyclic voltammetry. In Experiment 2, USVs were recorded following response-contingent or non-contingent optogenetic stimulation of midbrain DAergic neurons. Four 20-s schedules of optogenetic stimulation were used: fixed-interval, fixed-time, variable-interval, and variable-time. Results: Brief electrical stimulation of the MFB increased both 50-kHz call rate and phasic DA release in the NAcc. During optogenetic stimulation sessions, rats initially called at a high rate comparable to that observed following reinforcers such as psychostimulants. Although optogenetic stimulation maintained reinforced responding throughout the 2-h session, the call rate declined to near zero within the first 30 min. The trill call subtype predominated following both electrical and optical stimulation. Conclusion: The occurrence of electrically-evoked 50-kHz calls, time-locked to phasic DA (Experiment 1), provides correlational evidence supporting a role for phasic DA in USV production. However, in Experiment 2, the temporal dissociation between calling and optogenetic stimulation of midbrain DAergic neurons suggests that phasic mesolimbic DA release is not sufficient to produce 50-kHz calls. The emission of the trill subtype of 50-kHz calls potentially provides a marker distinguishing positive affect from positive reinforcement.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4672056
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46720562015-12-22 The Effects of Electrical and Optical Stimulation of Midbrain Dopaminergic Neurons on Rat 50-kHz Ultrasonic Vocalizations Scardochio, Tina Trujillo-Pisanty, Ivan Conover, Kent Shizgal, Peter Clarke, Paul B. S. Front Behav Neurosci Neuroscience Rationale: Adult rats emit ultrasonic vocalizations (USVs) at around 50-kHz; these commonly occur in contexts that putatively engender positive affect. While several reports indicate that dopaminergic (DAergic) transmission plays a role in the emission of 50-kHz calls, the pharmacological evidence is mixed. Different modes of dopamine (DA) release (i.e., tonic and phasic) could potentially explain this discrepancy. Objective: To investigate the potential role of phasic DA release in 50-kHz call emission. Methods: In Experiment 1, USVs were recorded in adult male rats following unexpected electrical stimulation of the medial forebrain bundle (MFB). In parallel, phasic DA release in the nucleus accumbens (NAcc) was recorded using fast-scan cyclic voltammetry. In Experiment 2, USVs were recorded following response-contingent or non-contingent optogenetic stimulation of midbrain DAergic neurons. Four 20-s schedules of optogenetic stimulation were used: fixed-interval, fixed-time, variable-interval, and variable-time. Results: Brief electrical stimulation of the MFB increased both 50-kHz call rate and phasic DA release in the NAcc. During optogenetic stimulation sessions, rats initially called at a high rate comparable to that observed following reinforcers such as psychostimulants. Although optogenetic stimulation maintained reinforced responding throughout the 2-h session, the call rate declined to near zero within the first 30 min. The trill call subtype predominated following both electrical and optical stimulation. Conclusion: The occurrence of electrically-evoked 50-kHz calls, time-locked to phasic DA (Experiment 1), provides correlational evidence supporting a role for phasic DA in USV production. However, in Experiment 2, the temporal dissociation between calling and optogenetic stimulation of midbrain DAergic neurons suggests that phasic mesolimbic DA release is not sufficient to produce 50-kHz calls. The emission of the trill subtype of 50-kHz calls potentially provides a marker distinguishing positive affect from positive reinforcement. Frontiers Media S.A. 2015-12-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4672056/ /pubmed/26696851 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00331 Text en Copyright © 2015 Scardochio, Trujillo-Pisanty, Conover, Shizgal and Clarke. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Scardochio, Tina
Trujillo-Pisanty, Ivan
Conover, Kent
Shizgal, Peter
Clarke, Paul B. S.
The Effects of Electrical and Optical Stimulation of Midbrain Dopaminergic Neurons on Rat 50-kHz Ultrasonic Vocalizations
title The Effects of Electrical and Optical Stimulation of Midbrain Dopaminergic Neurons on Rat 50-kHz Ultrasonic Vocalizations
title_full The Effects of Electrical and Optical Stimulation of Midbrain Dopaminergic Neurons on Rat 50-kHz Ultrasonic Vocalizations
title_fullStr The Effects of Electrical and Optical Stimulation of Midbrain Dopaminergic Neurons on Rat 50-kHz Ultrasonic Vocalizations
title_full_unstemmed The Effects of Electrical and Optical Stimulation of Midbrain Dopaminergic Neurons on Rat 50-kHz Ultrasonic Vocalizations
title_short The Effects of Electrical and Optical Stimulation of Midbrain Dopaminergic Neurons on Rat 50-kHz Ultrasonic Vocalizations
title_sort effects of electrical and optical stimulation of midbrain dopaminergic neurons on rat 50-khz ultrasonic vocalizations
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4672056/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26696851
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00331
work_keys_str_mv AT scardochiotina theeffectsofelectricalandopticalstimulationofmidbraindopaminergicneuronsonrat50khzultrasonicvocalizations
AT trujillopisantyivan theeffectsofelectricalandopticalstimulationofmidbraindopaminergicneuronsonrat50khzultrasonicvocalizations
AT conoverkent theeffectsofelectricalandopticalstimulationofmidbraindopaminergicneuronsonrat50khzultrasonicvocalizations
AT shizgalpeter theeffectsofelectricalandopticalstimulationofmidbraindopaminergicneuronsonrat50khzultrasonicvocalizations
AT clarkepaulbs theeffectsofelectricalandopticalstimulationofmidbraindopaminergicneuronsonrat50khzultrasonicvocalizations
AT scardochiotina effectsofelectricalandopticalstimulationofmidbraindopaminergicneuronsonrat50khzultrasonicvocalizations
AT trujillopisantyivan effectsofelectricalandopticalstimulationofmidbraindopaminergicneuronsonrat50khzultrasonicvocalizations
AT conoverkent effectsofelectricalandopticalstimulationofmidbraindopaminergicneuronsonrat50khzultrasonicvocalizations
AT shizgalpeter effectsofelectricalandopticalstimulationofmidbraindopaminergicneuronsonrat50khzultrasonicvocalizations
AT clarkepaulbs effectsofelectricalandopticalstimulationofmidbraindopaminergicneuronsonrat50khzultrasonicvocalizations