Cargando…
The Effects of Electrical and Optical Stimulation of Midbrain Dopaminergic Neurons on Rat 50-kHz Ultrasonic Vocalizations
Rationale: Adult rats emit ultrasonic vocalizations (USVs) at around 50-kHz; these commonly occur in contexts that putatively engender positive affect. While several reports indicate that dopaminergic (DAergic) transmission plays a role in the emission of 50-kHz calls, the pharmacological evidence i...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4672056/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26696851 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00331 |
_version_ | 1782404493978107904 |
---|---|
author | Scardochio, Tina Trujillo-Pisanty, Ivan Conover, Kent Shizgal, Peter Clarke, Paul B. S. |
author_facet | Scardochio, Tina Trujillo-Pisanty, Ivan Conover, Kent Shizgal, Peter Clarke, Paul B. S. |
author_sort | Scardochio, Tina |
collection | PubMed |
description | Rationale: Adult rats emit ultrasonic vocalizations (USVs) at around 50-kHz; these commonly occur in contexts that putatively engender positive affect. While several reports indicate that dopaminergic (DAergic) transmission plays a role in the emission of 50-kHz calls, the pharmacological evidence is mixed. Different modes of dopamine (DA) release (i.e., tonic and phasic) could potentially explain this discrepancy. Objective: To investigate the potential role of phasic DA release in 50-kHz call emission. Methods: In Experiment 1, USVs were recorded in adult male rats following unexpected electrical stimulation of the medial forebrain bundle (MFB). In parallel, phasic DA release in the nucleus accumbens (NAcc) was recorded using fast-scan cyclic voltammetry. In Experiment 2, USVs were recorded following response-contingent or non-contingent optogenetic stimulation of midbrain DAergic neurons. Four 20-s schedules of optogenetic stimulation were used: fixed-interval, fixed-time, variable-interval, and variable-time. Results: Brief electrical stimulation of the MFB increased both 50-kHz call rate and phasic DA release in the NAcc. During optogenetic stimulation sessions, rats initially called at a high rate comparable to that observed following reinforcers such as psychostimulants. Although optogenetic stimulation maintained reinforced responding throughout the 2-h session, the call rate declined to near zero within the first 30 min. The trill call subtype predominated following both electrical and optical stimulation. Conclusion: The occurrence of electrically-evoked 50-kHz calls, time-locked to phasic DA (Experiment 1), provides correlational evidence supporting a role for phasic DA in USV production. However, in Experiment 2, the temporal dissociation between calling and optogenetic stimulation of midbrain DAergic neurons suggests that phasic mesolimbic DA release is not sufficient to produce 50-kHz calls. The emission of the trill subtype of 50-kHz calls potentially provides a marker distinguishing positive affect from positive reinforcement. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4672056 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46720562015-12-22 The Effects of Electrical and Optical Stimulation of Midbrain Dopaminergic Neurons on Rat 50-kHz Ultrasonic Vocalizations Scardochio, Tina Trujillo-Pisanty, Ivan Conover, Kent Shizgal, Peter Clarke, Paul B. S. Front Behav Neurosci Neuroscience Rationale: Adult rats emit ultrasonic vocalizations (USVs) at around 50-kHz; these commonly occur in contexts that putatively engender positive affect. While several reports indicate that dopaminergic (DAergic) transmission plays a role in the emission of 50-kHz calls, the pharmacological evidence is mixed. Different modes of dopamine (DA) release (i.e., tonic and phasic) could potentially explain this discrepancy. Objective: To investigate the potential role of phasic DA release in 50-kHz call emission. Methods: In Experiment 1, USVs were recorded in adult male rats following unexpected electrical stimulation of the medial forebrain bundle (MFB). In parallel, phasic DA release in the nucleus accumbens (NAcc) was recorded using fast-scan cyclic voltammetry. In Experiment 2, USVs were recorded following response-contingent or non-contingent optogenetic stimulation of midbrain DAergic neurons. Four 20-s schedules of optogenetic stimulation were used: fixed-interval, fixed-time, variable-interval, and variable-time. Results: Brief electrical stimulation of the MFB increased both 50-kHz call rate and phasic DA release in the NAcc. During optogenetic stimulation sessions, rats initially called at a high rate comparable to that observed following reinforcers such as psychostimulants. Although optogenetic stimulation maintained reinforced responding throughout the 2-h session, the call rate declined to near zero within the first 30 min. The trill call subtype predominated following both electrical and optical stimulation. Conclusion: The occurrence of electrically-evoked 50-kHz calls, time-locked to phasic DA (Experiment 1), provides correlational evidence supporting a role for phasic DA in USV production. However, in Experiment 2, the temporal dissociation between calling and optogenetic stimulation of midbrain DAergic neurons suggests that phasic mesolimbic DA release is not sufficient to produce 50-kHz calls. The emission of the trill subtype of 50-kHz calls potentially provides a marker distinguishing positive affect from positive reinforcement. Frontiers Media S.A. 2015-12-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4672056/ /pubmed/26696851 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00331 Text en Copyright © 2015 Scardochio, Trujillo-Pisanty, Conover, Shizgal and Clarke. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience Scardochio, Tina Trujillo-Pisanty, Ivan Conover, Kent Shizgal, Peter Clarke, Paul B. S. The Effects of Electrical and Optical Stimulation of Midbrain Dopaminergic Neurons on Rat 50-kHz Ultrasonic Vocalizations |
title | The Effects of Electrical and Optical Stimulation of Midbrain Dopaminergic Neurons on Rat 50-kHz Ultrasonic Vocalizations |
title_full | The Effects of Electrical and Optical Stimulation of Midbrain Dopaminergic Neurons on Rat 50-kHz Ultrasonic Vocalizations |
title_fullStr | The Effects of Electrical and Optical Stimulation of Midbrain Dopaminergic Neurons on Rat 50-kHz Ultrasonic Vocalizations |
title_full_unstemmed | The Effects of Electrical and Optical Stimulation of Midbrain Dopaminergic Neurons on Rat 50-kHz Ultrasonic Vocalizations |
title_short | The Effects of Electrical and Optical Stimulation of Midbrain Dopaminergic Neurons on Rat 50-kHz Ultrasonic Vocalizations |
title_sort | effects of electrical and optical stimulation of midbrain dopaminergic neurons on rat 50-khz ultrasonic vocalizations |
topic | Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4672056/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26696851 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00331 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT scardochiotina theeffectsofelectricalandopticalstimulationofmidbraindopaminergicneuronsonrat50khzultrasonicvocalizations AT trujillopisantyivan theeffectsofelectricalandopticalstimulationofmidbraindopaminergicneuronsonrat50khzultrasonicvocalizations AT conoverkent theeffectsofelectricalandopticalstimulationofmidbraindopaminergicneuronsonrat50khzultrasonicvocalizations AT shizgalpeter theeffectsofelectricalandopticalstimulationofmidbraindopaminergicneuronsonrat50khzultrasonicvocalizations AT clarkepaulbs theeffectsofelectricalandopticalstimulationofmidbraindopaminergicneuronsonrat50khzultrasonicvocalizations AT scardochiotina effectsofelectricalandopticalstimulationofmidbraindopaminergicneuronsonrat50khzultrasonicvocalizations AT trujillopisantyivan effectsofelectricalandopticalstimulationofmidbraindopaminergicneuronsonrat50khzultrasonicvocalizations AT conoverkent effectsofelectricalandopticalstimulationofmidbraindopaminergicneuronsonrat50khzultrasonicvocalizations AT shizgalpeter effectsofelectricalandopticalstimulationofmidbraindopaminergicneuronsonrat50khzultrasonicvocalizations AT clarkepaulbs effectsofelectricalandopticalstimulationofmidbraindopaminergicneuronsonrat50khzultrasonicvocalizations |