Cargando…

Safety and Biocompatibility of a New High-Density Polyethylene-Based Spherical Integrated Porous Orbital Implant: An Experimental Study in Rabbits

Purpose. To evaluate clinically and histologically the safety and biocompatibility of a new HDPE-based spherical porous orbital implants in rabbits. Methods. MEDPOR (Porex Surgical, Inc., Fairburn, GA, USA), OCULFIT I, and OCULFIT II (AJL Ophthalmic S.A., Vitoria, Spain) implants were implanted in e...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fernandez-Bueno, Ivan, Di Lauro, Salvatore, Alvarez, Ivan, Lopez, Jose Carlos, Garcia-Gutierrez, Maria Teresa, Fernandez, Itziar, Larra, Eva, Pastor, Jose Carlos
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4672132/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26689343
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/904096
_version_ 1782404510774198272
author Fernandez-Bueno, Ivan
Di Lauro, Salvatore
Alvarez, Ivan
Lopez, Jose Carlos
Garcia-Gutierrez, Maria Teresa
Fernandez, Itziar
Larra, Eva
Pastor, Jose Carlos
author_facet Fernandez-Bueno, Ivan
Di Lauro, Salvatore
Alvarez, Ivan
Lopez, Jose Carlos
Garcia-Gutierrez, Maria Teresa
Fernandez, Itziar
Larra, Eva
Pastor, Jose Carlos
author_sort Fernandez-Bueno, Ivan
collection PubMed
description Purpose. To evaluate clinically and histologically the safety and biocompatibility of a new HDPE-based spherical porous orbital implants in rabbits. Methods. MEDPOR (Porex Surgical, Inc., Fairburn, GA, USA), OCULFIT I, and OCULFIT II (AJL Ophthalmic S.A., Vitoria, Spain) implants were implanted in eviscerated rabbis. Animals were randomly divided into 6 groups (n = 4 each) according to the 3 implant materials tested and 2 follow-up times of 90 or 180 days. Signs of regional pain and presence of eyelid swelling, conjunctival hyperemia, and amount of exudate were semiquantitatively evaluated. After animals sacrifice, the implants and surrounding ocular tissues were processed for histological staining and polarized light evaluation. Statistical study was performed by ANOVA and Kaplan-Meier analysis. Results. No statistically significant differences in regional pain, eyelid swelling, or conjunctival hyperemia were shown between implants and/or time points evaluated. However, amount of exudate differed, with OCULFIT I causing the smallest amount. No remarkable clinical complications were observed. Histological findings were similar in all three types of implants and agree with minor inflammatory response. Conclusions. OCULFIT ophthalmic tolerance and biocompatibility in rabbits were comparable to the clinically used MEDPOR. Clinical studies are needed to determine if OCULFIT is superior to the orbital implants commercially available.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4672132
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46721322015-12-20 Safety and Biocompatibility of a New High-Density Polyethylene-Based Spherical Integrated Porous Orbital Implant: An Experimental Study in Rabbits Fernandez-Bueno, Ivan Di Lauro, Salvatore Alvarez, Ivan Lopez, Jose Carlos Garcia-Gutierrez, Maria Teresa Fernandez, Itziar Larra, Eva Pastor, Jose Carlos J Ophthalmol Research Article Purpose. To evaluate clinically and histologically the safety and biocompatibility of a new HDPE-based spherical porous orbital implants in rabbits. Methods. MEDPOR (Porex Surgical, Inc., Fairburn, GA, USA), OCULFIT I, and OCULFIT II (AJL Ophthalmic S.A., Vitoria, Spain) implants were implanted in eviscerated rabbis. Animals were randomly divided into 6 groups (n = 4 each) according to the 3 implant materials tested and 2 follow-up times of 90 or 180 days. Signs of regional pain and presence of eyelid swelling, conjunctival hyperemia, and amount of exudate were semiquantitatively evaluated. After animals sacrifice, the implants and surrounding ocular tissues were processed for histological staining and polarized light evaluation. Statistical study was performed by ANOVA and Kaplan-Meier analysis. Results. No statistically significant differences in regional pain, eyelid swelling, or conjunctival hyperemia were shown between implants and/or time points evaluated. However, amount of exudate differed, with OCULFIT I causing the smallest amount. No remarkable clinical complications were observed. Histological findings were similar in all three types of implants and agree with minor inflammatory response. Conclusions. OCULFIT ophthalmic tolerance and biocompatibility in rabbits were comparable to the clinically used MEDPOR. Clinical studies are needed to determine if OCULFIT is superior to the orbital implants commercially available. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2015 2015-11-24 /pmc/articles/PMC4672132/ /pubmed/26689343 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/904096 Text en Copyright © 2015 Ivan Fernandez-Bueno et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Fernandez-Bueno, Ivan
Di Lauro, Salvatore
Alvarez, Ivan
Lopez, Jose Carlos
Garcia-Gutierrez, Maria Teresa
Fernandez, Itziar
Larra, Eva
Pastor, Jose Carlos
Safety and Biocompatibility of a New High-Density Polyethylene-Based Spherical Integrated Porous Orbital Implant: An Experimental Study in Rabbits
title Safety and Biocompatibility of a New High-Density Polyethylene-Based Spherical Integrated Porous Orbital Implant: An Experimental Study in Rabbits
title_full Safety and Biocompatibility of a New High-Density Polyethylene-Based Spherical Integrated Porous Orbital Implant: An Experimental Study in Rabbits
title_fullStr Safety and Biocompatibility of a New High-Density Polyethylene-Based Spherical Integrated Porous Orbital Implant: An Experimental Study in Rabbits
title_full_unstemmed Safety and Biocompatibility of a New High-Density Polyethylene-Based Spherical Integrated Porous Orbital Implant: An Experimental Study in Rabbits
title_short Safety and Biocompatibility of a New High-Density Polyethylene-Based Spherical Integrated Porous Orbital Implant: An Experimental Study in Rabbits
title_sort safety and biocompatibility of a new high-density polyethylene-based spherical integrated porous orbital implant: an experimental study in rabbits
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4672132/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26689343
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/904096
work_keys_str_mv AT fernandezbuenoivan safetyandbiocompatibilityofanewhighdensitypolyethylenebasedsphericalintegratedporousorbitalimplantanexperimentalstudyinrabbits
AT dilaurosalvatore safetyandbiocompatibilityofanewhighdensitypolyethylenebasedsphericalintegratedporousorbitalimplantanexperimentalstudyinrabbits
AT alvarezivan safetyandbiocompatibilityofanewhighdensitypolyethylenebasedsphericalintegratedporousorbitalimplantanexperimentalstudyinrabbits
AT lopezjosecarlos safetyandbiocompatibilityofanewhighdensitypolyethylenebasedsphericalintegratedporousorbitalimplantanexperimentalstudyinrabbits
AT garciagutierrezmariateresa safetyandbiocompatibilityofanewhighdensitypolyethylenebasedsphericalintegratedporousorbitalimplantanexperimentalstudyinrabbits
AT fernandezitziar safetyandbiocompatibilityofanewhighdensitypolyethylenebasedsphericalintegratedporousorbitalimplantanexperimentalstudyinrabbits
AT larraeva safetyandbiocompatibilityofanewhighdensitypolyethylenebasedsphericalintegratedporousorbitalimplantanexperimentalstudyinrabbits
AT pastorjosecarlos safetyandbiocompatibilityofanewhighdensitypolyethylenebasedsphericalintegratedporousorbitalimplantanexperimentalstudyinrabbits