Cargando…

Feasibility and initial efficacy of a culturally sensitive women-centered substance use intervention in Georgia: Sex risk outcomes

BACKGROUND: This paper reports on the feasibility and initial efficacy of a culturally sensitive, comprehensive women-centered substance use intervention for women who inject drugs in Georgia in terms of the primary and secondary sex risk outcomes. The hypothesis under examination was that, relative...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jones, Hendrée E., Kirtadze, Irma, Otiashvili, David, Murphy, Keryn, O’Grady, Kevin E., Zule, William, Krupitsky, Evgeny, Wechsberg, Wendee M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4672492/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26644132
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13011-015-0043-0
_version_ 1782404578210217984
author Jones, Hendrée E.
Kirtadze, Irma
Otiashvili, David
Murphy, Keryn
O’Grady, Kevin E.
Zule, William
Krupitsky, Evgeny
Wechsberg, Wendee M.
author_facet Jones, Hendrée E.
Kirtadze, Irma
Otiashvili, David
Murphy, Keryn
O’Grady, Kevin E.
Zule, William
Krupitsky, Evgeny
Wechsberg, Wendee M.
author_sort Jones, Hendrée E.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This paper reports on the feasibility and initial efficacy of a culturally sensitive, comprehensive women-centered substance use intervention for women who inject drugs in Georgia in terms of the primary and secondary sex risk outcomes. The hypothesis under examination was that, relative to case management participants, participants in a culturally sensitive, comprehensive women-specific and -centered intervention would, on average, show significant decreases in past-30-day frequency of unprotected sex, unprotected sex at the last sexual encounter, and increases in condom use and safer sex actions. METHODS: The study was a two-arm randomized trial, in which 173 potentially eligible women were screened, and those 128 women determined to be eligible were assigned at random to either Reinforcement-based Treatment plus Women’s Co-Op (RBT + WC) or case management (CM). RBT + WC participants received 12 sessions of a structured intervention with the goal of reducing risky sex and substance use and improving physical and mental health. CM participants received 12 sessions of case management and informational brochures that focused on the same issues on which RBT + WC focused. Participants were assessed at baseline, post-treatment, and 3 months following treatment enrollment. RESULTS: Analyses revealed case management having significantly overall higher Safer Sex action scores than RBT + WC, and a significant decrease over time for past 30-day number of unprotected sex acts. Unprotected sex at the last encounter and Condom Use action scores were nonsignificant. CONCLUSIONS: Women who inject drugs in Georgia are engaging in risky sexual practices, and are in need of an intervention that addresses these risky behaviors. Reasons for the failure to find differences between a culturally sensitive, comprehensive women-centered intervention and case management tailored to the needs of women who inject drugs in Georgia may have been the result of inadequate power to detect an effect in a sample whose drug use was not as serious as warranted by the intervention. (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01331460)
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4672492
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46724922015-12-09 Feasibility and initial efficacy of a culturally sensitive women-centered substance use intervention in Georgia: Sex risk outcomes Jones, Hendrée E. Kirtadze, Irma Otiashvili, David Murphy, Keryn O’Grady, Kevin E. Zule, William Krupitsky, Evgeny Wechsberg, Wendee M. Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy Research BACKGROUND: This paper reports on the feasibility and initial efficacy of a culturally sensitive, comprehensive women-centered substance use intervention for women who inject drugs in Georgia in terms of the primary and secondary sex risk outcomes. The hypothesis under examination was that, relative to case management participants, participants in a culturally sensitive, comprehensive women-specific and -centered intervention would, on average, show significant decreases in past-30-day frequency of unprotected sex, unprotected sex at the last sexual encounter, and increases in condom use and safer sex actions. METHODS: The study was a two-arm randomized trial, in which 173 potentially eligible women were screened, and those 128 women determined to be eligible were assigned at random to either Reinforcement-based Treatment plus Women’s Co-Op (RBT + WC) or case management (CM). RBT + WC participants received 12 sessions of a structured intervention with the goal of reducing risky sex and substance use and improving physical and mental health. CM participants received 12 sessions of case management and informational brochures that focused on the same issues on which RBT + WC focused. Participants were assessed at baseline, post-treatment, and 3 months following treatment enrollment. RESULTS: Analyses revealed case management having significantly overall higher Safer Sex action scores than RBT + WC, and a significant decrease over time for past 30-day number of unprotected sex acts. Unprotected sex at the last encounter and Condom Use action scores were nonsignificant. CONCLUSIONS: Women who inject drugs in Georgia are engaging in risky sexual practices, and are in need of an intervention that addresses these risky behaviors. Reasons for the failure to find differences between a culturally sensitive, comprehensive women-centered intervention and case management tailored to the needs of women who inject drugs in Georgia may have been the result of inadequate power to detect an effect in a sample whose drug use was not as serious as warranted by the intervention. (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01331460) BioMed Central 2015-12-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4672492/ /pubmed/26644132 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13011-015-0043-0 Text en © Jones et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Jones, Hendrée E.
Kirtadze, Irma
Otiashvili, David
Murphy, Keryn
O’Grady, Kevin E.
Zule, William
Krupitsky, Evgeny
Wechsberg, Wendee M.
Feasibility and initial efficacy of a culturally sensitive women-centered substance use intervention in Georgia: Sex risk outcomes
title Feasibility and initial efficacy of a culturally sensitive women-centered substance use intervention in Georgia: Sex risk outcomes
title_full Feasibility and initial efficacy of a culturally sensitive women-centered substance use intervention in Georgia: Sex risk outcomes
title_fullStr Feasibility and initial efficacy of a culturally sensitive women-centered substance use intervention in Georgia: Sex risk outcomes
title_full_unstemmed Feasibility and initial efficacy of a culturally sensitive women-centered substance use intervention in Georgia: Sex risk outcomes
title_short Feasibility and initial efficacy of a culturally sensitive women-centered substance use intervention in Georgia: Sex risk outcomes
title_sort feasibility and initial efficacy of a culturally sensitive women-centered substance use intervention in georgia: sex risk outcomes
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4672492/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26644132
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13011-015-0043-0
work_keys_str_mv AT joneshendreee feasibilityandinitialefficacyofaculturallysensitivewomencenteredsubstanceuseinterventioningeorgiasexriskoutcomes
AT kirtadzeirma feasibilityandinitialefficacyofaculturallysensitivewomencenteredsubstanceuseinterventioningeorgiasexriskoutcomes
AT otiashvilidavid feasibilityandinitialefficacyofaculturallysensitivewomencenteredsubstanceuseinterventioningeorgiasexriskoutcomes
AT murphykeryn feasibilityandinitialefficacyofaculturallysensitivewomencenteredsubstanceuseinterventioningeorgiasexriskoutcomes
AT ogradykevine feasibilityandinitialefficacyofaculturallysensitivewomencenteredsubstanceuseinterventioningeorgiasexriskoutcomes
AT zulewilliam feasibilityandinitialefficacyofaculturallysensitivewomencenteredsubstanceuseinterventioningeorgiasexriskoutcomes
AT krupitskyevgeny feasibilityandinitialefficacyofaculturallysensitivewomencenteredsubstanceuseinterventioningeorgiasexriskoutcomes
AT wechsbergwendeem feasibilityandinitialefficacyofaculturallysensitivewomencenteredsubstanceuseinterventioningeorgiasexriskoutcomes