Cargando…

The characteristics of patients who discontinue their dying process – an observational study at a single university hospital centre

BACKGROUND: End-of-life integrated care plans are used as structuring tools for the care of the dying. A widely adopted example is the Liverpool Care Pathway for the Dying Patient (LCP). Recently, several concerns were raised about LCP care, such as a worry that diagnosis of dying might be leading t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schulz, Christian, Schlieper, Daniel, Altreuther, Christiane, Schallenburger, Manuela, Fetz, Katharina, Schmitz, Andrea
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4672507/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26643576
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12904-015-0070-7
_version_ 1782404581627527168
author Schulz, Christian
Schlieper, Daniel
Altreuther, Christiane
Schallenburger, Manuela
Fetz, Katharina
Schmitz, Andrea
author_facet Schulz, Christian
Schlieper, Daniel
Altreuther, Christiane
Schallenburger, Manuela
Fetz, Katharina
Schmitz, Andrea
author_sort Schulz, Christian
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: End-of-life integrated care plans are used as structuring tools for the care of the dying. A widely adopted example is the Liverpool Care Pathway for the Dying Patient (LCP). Recently, several concerns were raised about LCP care, such as a worry that diagnosis of dying might be leading to a self-fulfilling trajectory, including hastening of death. However, data on rates of discontinuation of LCP care are lacking. In an observational study, we therefore investigated the incidence, features and trajectory of patients who were discontinued from the LCP. We hypothesised that (1) it is common to discontinue patients from the LCP, (2) quality of life does not decrease for discontinued LCP patients, and (3) discontinued patients live longer than patients who remain within LCP care. METHODS: All adult patients who were diagnosed as dying in a German university hospital specialized palliative care unit were included in 2013 and 2014. Actuarial estimation of survival prognostication tools and a number of quality of life indicators were used for data collection. Survival time was analysed using Kaplan-Meier estimates. Group differences in quality of life were tested using multivariate analysis of variance. RESULTS: 159 patients were included in a digital version of the LCP. 15 patients (9.4 %) were discontinued later. Quality of life did not decrease for discontinued patients during LCP care (p = 0.16). LCP discontinued patients lived significantly longer than the remaining LCP subgroup (difference of means 296 hours, 95 % confidence interval 105.5 to 451.5 hours; difference of survival function estimates p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: When patients are diagnosed as dying, death is not the inevitable outcome of an end-of-life integrated care plan such as the LCP. Instead, it is common to discontinue the LCP care. Regular careful interprofessional assessments are important for identifying those patients who need to be discontinued from their end-of-life care plan. In this study, we found no evidence for harm by the LCP. We conclude that a correctly applied integrated care plan can be useful to provide good and safe care for the dying. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Internal Clinical Trial Register of the Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, No. 2015053680 (22 May 2015).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4672507
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46725072015-12-09 The characteristics of patients who discontinue their dying process – an observational study at a single university hospital centre Schulz, Christian Schlieper, Daniel Altreuther, Christiane Schallenburger, Manuela Fetz, Katharina Schmitz, Andrea BMC Palliat Care Research Article BACKGROUND: End-of-life integrated care plans are used as structuring tools for the care of the dying. A widely adopted example is the Liverpool Care Pathway for the Dying Patient (LCP). Recently, several concerns were raised about LCP care, such as a worry that diagnosis of dying might be leading to a self-fulfilling trajectory, including hastening of death. However, data on rates of discontinuation of LCP care are lacking. In an observational study, we therefore investigated the incidence, features and trajectory of patients who were discontinued from the LCP. We hypothesised that (1) it is common to discontinue patients from the LCP, (2) quality of life does not decrease for discontinued LCP patients, and (3) discontinued patients live longer than patients who remain within LCP care. METHODS: All adult patients who were diagnosed as dying in a German university hospital specialized palliative care unit were included in 2013 and 2014. Actuarial estimation of survival prognostication tools and a number of quality of life indicators were used for data collection. Survival time was analysed using Kaplan-Meier estimates. Group differences in quality of life were tested using multivariate analysis of variance. RESULTS: 159 patients were included in a digital version of the LCP. 15 patients (9.4 %) were discontinued later. Quality of life did not decrease for discontinued patients during LCP care (p = 0.16). LCP discontinued patients lived significantly longer than the remaining LCP subgroup (difference of means 296 hours, 95 % confidence interval 105.5 to 451.5 hours; difference of survival function estimates p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: When patients are diagnosed as dying, death is not the inevitable outcome of an end-of-life integrated care plan such as the LCP. Instead, it is common to discontinue the LCP care. Regular careful interprofessional assessments are important for identifying those patients who need to be discontinued from their end-of-life care plan. In this study, we found no evidence for harm by the LCP. We conclude that a correctly applied integrated care plan can be useful to provide good and safe care for the dying. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Internal Clinical Trial Register of the Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, No. 2015053680 (22 May 2015). BioMed Central 2015-12-07 /pmc/articles/PMC4672507/ /pubmed/26643576 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12904-015-0070-7 Text en © Schulz et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Schulz, Christian
Schlieper, Daniel
Altreuther, Christiane
Schallenburger, Manuela
Fetz, Katharina
Schmitz, Andrea
The characteristics of patients who discontinue their dying process – an observational study at a single university hospital centre
title The characteristics of patients who discontinue their dying process – an observational study at a single university hospital centre
title_full The characteristics of patients who discontinue their dying process – an observational study at a single university hospital centre
title_fullStr The characteristics of patients who discontinue their dying process – an observational study at a single university hospital centre
title_full_unstemmed The characteristics of patients who discontinue their dying process – an observational study at a single university hospital centre
title_short The characteristics of patients who discontinue their dying process – an observational study at a single university hospital centre
title_sort characteristics of patients who discontinue their dying process – an observational study at a single university hospital centre
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4672507/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26643576
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12904-015-0070-7
work_keys_str_mv AT schulzchristian thecharacteristicsofpatientswhodiscontinuetheirdyingprocessanobservationalstudyatasingleuniversityhospitalcentre
AT schlieperdaniel thecharacteristicsofpatientswhodiscontinuetheirdyingprocessanobservationalstudyatasingleuniversityhospitalcentre
AT altreutherchristiane thecharacteristicsofpatientswhodiscontinuetheirdyingprocessanobservationalstudyatasingleuniversityhospitalcentre
AT schallenburgermanuela thecharacteristicsofpatientswhodiscontinuetheirdyingprocessanobservationalstudyatasingleuniversityhospitalcentre
AT fetzkatharina thecharacteristicsofpatientswhodiscontinuetheirdyingprocessanobservationalstudyatasingleuniversityhospitalcentre
AT schmitzandrea thecharacteristicsofpatientswhodiscontinuetheirdyingprocessanobservationalstudyatasingleuniversityhospitalcentre
AT schulzchristian characteristicsofpatientswhodiscontinuetheirdyingprocessanobservationalstudyatasingleuniversityhospitalcentre
AT schlieperdaniel characteristicsofpatientswhodiscontinuetheirdyingprocessanobservationalstudyatasingleuniversityhospitalcentre
AT altreutherchristiane characteristicsofpatientswhodiscontinuetheirdyingprocessanobservationalstudyatasingleuniversityhospitalcentre
AT schallenburgermanuela characteristicsofpatientswhodiscontinuetheirdyingprocessanobservationalstudyatasingleuniversityhospitalcentre
AT fetzkatharina characteristicsofpatientswhodiscontinuetheirdyingprocessanobservationalstudyatasingleuniversityhospitalcentre
AT schmitzandrea characteristicsofpatientswhodiscontinuetheirdyingprocessanobservationalstudyatasingleuniversityhospitalcentre