Cargando…

Eviprostat has an identical effect compared to pollen extract (Cernilton) in patients with chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome: a randomized, prospective study

BACKGROUND: Previously reported results of a prospective, randomized placebo-controlled study showed that the pollen extract (Cernilton) significantly improved total symptoms, pain, and quality of life in patients with inflammatory prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CP/CPPS) without severe si...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Iwamura, Hiromichi, Koie, Takuya, Soma, Osamu, Matsumoto, Teppei, Imai, Atsushi, Hatakeyama, Shingo, Yoneyama, Takahiro, Hashimoto, Yasuhiro, Ohyama, Chikara
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4672535/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26643109
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12894-015-0115-5
_version_ 1782404588172738560
author Iwamura, Hiromichi
Koie, Takuya
Soma, Osamu
Matsumoto, Teppei
Imai, Atsushi
Hatakeyama, Shingo
Yoneyama, Takahiro
Hashimoto, Yasuhiro
Ohyama, Chikara
author_facet Iwamura, Hiromichi
Koie, Takuya
Soma, Osamu
Matsumoto, Teppei
Imai, Atsushi
Hatakeyama, Shingo
Yoneyama, Takahiro
Hashimoto, Yasuhiro
Ohyama, Chikara
author_sort Iwamura, Hiromichi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Previously reported results of a prospective, randomized placebo-controlled study showed that the pollen extract (Cernilton) significantly improved total symptoms, pain, and quality of life in patients with inflammatory prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CP/CPPS) without severe side effects. A phytotherapeutic agent, Eviprostat, is reportedly effective in a rat model of nonbacterial prostatitis. The aim of the present study was to compare the efficacy and safety of Eviprostat to that of the pollen extract in the management of CP/CPPS. METHODS: The patients with category III CP/CPPS were randomized to receive either oral capsules of Eviprostat (two capsules, q 8 h) or the pollen extract (two capsules, q 8 h) for 8 weeks. The primary endpoint of the study was symptomatic improvement in the NIH Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index (NIH-CPSI). Participants were evaluated using the NIH-CPSI and the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) at baseline and after 4 and 8 weeks. RESULTS: In the intention-to-treat analysis, 100 men were randomly allocated to Eviprostat (n = 50) or the pollen extract (n = 50). Response (defined as a decrease in the NIH-CPSI total score by at least 25 %) in the Eviprostat group and the pollen extract group was 88.2 and 78.1 %, respectively. There was no significant difference in the total, pain, urinary, and quality of life (QOL) scores of the NIH-CPSI between the two groups at 8 weeks. This was also the case with the total, voiding, and storage symptoms of the IPSS. There were no severe adverse events observed in any patients in this study. CONCLUSION: Both the pollen extract and Eviprostat significantly reduced the symptoms of category III CP/CPPS without any adverse events. Eviprostat may have an identical effect on category III CP/CPPS compared the pollen extract. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered with the University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry in Japan (UMIN000019618); registration date: 3 November 2015.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4672535
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46725352015-12-09 Eviprostat has an identical effect compared to pollen extract (Cernilton) in patients with chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome: a randomized, prospective study Iwamura, Hiromichi Koie, Takuya Soma, Osamu Matsumoto, Teppei Imai, Atsushi Hatakeyama, Shingo Yoneyama, Takahiro Hashimoto, Yasuhiro Ohyama, Chikara BMC Urol Research Article BACKGROUND: Previously reported results of a prospective, randomized placebo-controlled study showed that the pollen extract (Cernilton) significantly improved total symptoms, pain, and quality of life in patients with inflammatory prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CP/CPPS) without severe side effects. A phytotherapeutic agent, Eviprostat, is reportedly effective in a rat model of nonbacterial prostatitis. The aim of the present study was to compare the efficacy and safety of Eviprostat to that of the pollen extract in the management of CP/CPPS. METHODS: The patients with category III CP/CPPS were randomized to receive either oral capsules of Eviprostat (two capsules, q 8 h) or the pollen extract (two capsules, q 8 h) for 8 weeks. The primary endpoint of the study was symptomatic improvement in the NIH Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index (NIH-CPSI). Participants were evaluated using the NIH-CPSI and the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) at baseline and after 4 and 8 weeks. RESULTS: In the intention-to-treat analysis, 100 men were randomly allocated to Eviprostat (n = 50) or the pollen extract (n = 50). Response (defined as a decrease in the NIH-CPSI total score by at least 25 %) in the Eviprostat group and the pollen extract group was 88.2 and 78.1 %, respectively. There was no significant difference in the total, pain, urinary, and quality of life (QOL) scores of the NIH-CPSI between the two groups at 8 weeks. This was also the case with the total, voiding, and storage symptoms of the IPSS. There were no severe adverse events observed in any patients in this study. CONCLUSION: Both the pollen extract and Eviprostat significantly reduced the symptoms of category III CP/CPPS without any adverse events. Eviprostat may have an identical effect on category III CP/CPPS compared the pollen extract. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered with the University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry in Japan (UMIN000019618); registration date: 3 November 2015. BioMed Central 2015-12-07 /pmc/articles/PMC4672535/ /pubmed/26643109 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12894-015-0115-5 Text en © Iwamura et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Iwamura, Hiromichi
Koie, Takuya
Soma, Osamu
Matsumoto, Teppei
Imai, Atsushi
Hatakeyama, Shingo
Yoneyama, Takahiro
Hashimoto, Yasuhiro
Ohyama, Chikara
Eviprostat has an identical effect compared to pollen extract (Cernilton) in patients with chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome: a randomized, prospective study
title Eviprostat has an identical effect compared to pollen extract (Cernilton) in patients with chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome: a randomized, prospective study
title_full Eviprostat has an identical effect compared to pollen extract (Cernilton) in patients with chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome: a randomized, prospective study
title_fullStr Eviprostat has an identical effect compared to pollen extract (Cernilton) in patients with chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome: a randomized, prospective study
title_full_unstemmed Eviprostat has an identical effect compared to pollen extract (Cernilton) in patients with chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome: a randomized, prospective study
title_short Eviprostat has an identical effect compared to pollen extract (Cernilton) in patients with chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome: a randomized, prospective study
title_sort eviprostat has an identical effect compared to pollen extract (cernilton) in patients with chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome: a randomized, prospective study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4672535/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26643109
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12894-015-0115-5
work_keys_str_mv AT iwamurahiromichi eviprostathasanidenticaleffectcomparedtopollenextractcerniltoninpatientswithchronicprostatitischronicpelvicpainsyndromearandomizedprospectivestudy
AT koietakuya eviprostathasanidenticaleffectcomparedtopollenextractcerniltoninpatientswithchronicprostatitischronicpelvicpainsyndromearandomizedprospectivestudy
AT somaosamu eviprostathasanidenticaleffectcomparedtopollenextractcerniltoninpatientswithchronicprostatitischronicpelvicpainsyndromearandomizedprospectivestudy
AT matsumototeppei eviprostathasanidenticaleffectcomparedtopollenextractcerniltoninpatientswithchronicprostatitischronicpelvicpainsyndromearandomizedprospectivestudy
AT imaiatsushi eviprostathasanidenticaleffectcomparedtopollenextractcerniltoninpatientswithchronicprostatitischronicpelvicpainsyndromearandomizedprospectivestudy
AT hatakeyamashingo eviprostathasanidenticaleffectcomparedtopollenextractcerniltoninpatientswithchronicprostatitischronicpelvicpainsyndromearandomizedprospectivestudy
AT yoneyamatakahiro eviprostathasanidenticaleffectcomparedtopollenextractcerniltoninpatientswithchronicprostatitischronicpelvicpainsyndromearandomizedprospectivestudy
AT hashimotoyasuhiro eviprostathasanidenticaleffectcomparedtopollenextractcerniltoninpatientswithchronicprostatitischronicpelvicpainsyndromearandomizedprospectivestudy
AT ohyamachikara eviprostathasanidenticaleffectcomparedtopollenextractcerniltoninpatientswithchronicprostatitischronicpelvicpainsyndromearandomizedprospectivestudy