Cargando…
Exposed Dental Implant? Local Autograft A Saviour!
Implant exposure due to faulty placement, posses as the most common reason for implant failure. The implant placed too close to buccal or lingual cortex have lead to such failure on numerous occasions. Also, anatomic variations like the thin buccolingual width of alveolar ridge predispose exposure o...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dentmedpub Research and Printing Co
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4672862/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26668490 |
_version_ | 1782404635514896384 |
---|---|
author | Rai, Raj Punde, Prashant A Suryavanshi, Harshal Shree, Swetha |
author_facet | Rai, Raj Punde, Prashant A Suryavanshi, Harshal Shree, Swetha |
author_sort | Rai, Raj |
collection | PubMed |
description | Implant exposure due to faulty placement, posses as the most common reason for implant failure. The implant placed too close to buccal or lingual cortex have lead to such failure on numerous occasions. Also, anatomic variations like the thin buccolingual width of alveolar ridge predispose exposure of the implant. 25-year-old female patient had undergone surgical placement of implants in mandibular anterior region 2 months back in the private dental clinic. The clinician noted Grade I mobility in one of the implants placed. The case was referred to the author. Thin overlying gingiva depicted an entire buccal aspect of the implant, which suggested more than 90 % loss of buccal cortex. According to literature and review of similar case reports, the only way suggested was to surgically remove the implant and wait for 12-24 months for the bone to heal for subsequent placement. Rather than the removal of implants as suggested, the author followed a naval approach of reinforcing buccal cortex using an autogenous cortical block from mandibular symphysis. The reinforcement surgery had certainly saved patients time, money and most importantly limits a crucial period of edentulism, which may be enforced on a patient in case the implant was removed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4672862 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Dentmedpub Research and Printing Co |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46728622015-12-14 Exposed Dental Implant? Local Autograft A Saviour! Rai, Raj Punde, Prashant A Suryavanshi, Harshal Shree, Swetha J Int Oral Health Case Report Implant exposure due to faulty placement, posses as the most common reason for implant failure. The implant placed too close to buccal or lingual cortex have lead to such failure on numerous occasions. Also, anatomic variations like the thin buccolingual width of alveolar ridge predispose exposure of the implant. 25-year-old female patient had undergone surgical placement of implants in mandibular anterior region 2 months back in the private dental clinic. The clinician noted Grade I mobility in one of the implants placed. The case was referred to the author. Thin overlying gingiva depicted an entire buccal aspect of the implant, which suggested more than 90 % loss of buccal cortex. According to literature and review of similar case reports, the only way suggested was to surgically remove the implant and wait for 12-24 months for the bone to heal for subsequent placement. Rather than the removal of implants as suggested, the author followed a naval approach of reinforcing buccal cortex using an autogenous cortical block from mandibular symphysis. The reinforcement surgery had certainly saved patients time, money and most importantly limits a crucial period of edentulism, which may be enforced on a patient in case the implant was removed. Dentmedpub Research and Printing Co 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4672862/ /pubmed/26668490 Text en Copyright: © Journal of International Oral Health http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Case Report Rai, Raj Punde, Prashant A Suryavanshi, Harshal Shree, Swetha Exposed Dental Implant? Local Autograft A Saviour! |
title | Exposed Dental Implant? Local Autograft A Saviour! |
title_full | Exposed Dental Implant? Local Autograft A Saviour! |
title_fullStr | Exposed Dental Implant? Local Autograft A Saviour! |
title_full_unstemmed | Exposed Dental Implant? Local Autograft A Saviour! |
title_short | Exposed Dental Implant? Local Autograft A Saviour! |
title_sort | exposed dental implant? local autograft a saviour! |
topic | Case Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4672862/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26668490 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rairaj exposeddentalimplantlocalautograftasaviour AT pundeprashanta exposeddentalimplantlocalautograftasaviour AT suryavanshiharshal exposeddentalimplantlocalautograftasaviour AT shreeswetha exposeddentalimplantlocalautograftasaviour |