Cargando…

Exposed Dental Implant? Local Autograft A Saviour!

Implant exposure due to faulty placement, posses as the most common reason for implant failure. The implant placed too close to buccal or lingual cortex have lead to such failure on numerous occasions. Also, anatomic variations like the thin buccolingual width of alveolar ridge predispose exposure o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rai, Raj, Punde, Prashant A, Suryavanshi, Harshal, Shree, Swetha
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dentmedpub Research and Printing Co 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4672862/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26668490
_version_ 1782404635514896384
author Rai, Raj
Punde, Prashant A
Suryavanshi, Harshal
Shree, Swetha
author_facet Rai, Raj
Punde, Prashant A
Suryavanshi, Harshal
Shree, Swetha
author_sort Rai, Raj
collection PubMed
description Implant exposure due to faulty placement, posses as the most common reason for implant failure. The implant placed too close to buccal or lingual cortex have lead to such failure on numerous occasions. Also, anatomic variations like the thin buccolingual width of alveolar ridge predispose exposure of the implant. 25-year-old female patient had undergone surgical placement of implants in mandibular anterior region 2 months back in the private dental clinic. The clinician noted Grade I mobility in one of the implants placed. The case was referred to the author. Thin overlying gingiva depicted an entire buccal aspect of the implant, which suggested more than 90 % loss of buccal cortex. According to literature and review of similar case reports, the only way suggested was to surgically remove the implant and wait for 12-24 months for the bone to heal for subsequent placement. Rather than the removal of implants as suggested, the author followed a naval approach of reinforcing buccal cortex using an autogenous cortical block from mandibular symphysis. The reinforcement surgery had certainly saved patients time, money and most importantly limits a crucial period of edentulism, which may be enforced on a patient in case the implant was removed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4672862
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Dentmedpub Research and Printing Co
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46728622015-12-14 Exposed Dental Implant? Local Autograft A Saviour! Rai, Raj Punde, Prashant A Suryavanshi, Harshal Shree, Swetha J Int Oral Health Case Report Implant exposure due to faulty placement, posses as the most common reason for implant failure. The implant placed too close to buccal or lingual cortex have lead to such failure on numerous occasions. Also, anatomic variations like the thin buccolingual width of alveolar ridge predispose exposure of the implant. 25-year-old female patient had undergone surgical placement of implants in mandibular anterior region 2 months back in the private dental clinic. The clinician noted Grade I mobility in one of the implants placed. The case was referred to the author. Thin overlying gingiva depicted an entire buccal aspect of the implant, which suggested more than 90 % loss of buccal cortex. According to literature and review of similar case reports, the only way suggested was to surgically remove the implant and wait for 12-24 months for the bone to heal for subsequent placement. Rather than the removal of implants as suggested, the author followed a naval approach of reinforcing buccal cortex using an autogenous cortical block from mandibular symphysis. The reinforcement surgery had certainly saved patients time, money and most importantly limits a crucial period of edentulism, which may be enforced on a patient in case the implant was removed. Dentmedpub Research and Printing Co 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4672862/ /pubmed/26668490 Text en Copyright: © Journal of International Oral Health http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Case Report
Rai, Raj
Punde, Prashant A
Suryavanshi, Harshal
Shree, Swetha
Exposed Dental Implant? Local Autograft A Saviour!
title Exposed Dental Implant? Local Autograft A Saviour!
title_full Exposed Dental Implant? Local Autograft A Saviour!
title_fullStr Exposed Dental Implant? Local Autograft A Saviour!
title_full_unstemmed Exposed Dental Implant? Local Autograft A Saviour!
title_short Exposed Dental Implant? Local Autograft A Saviour!
title_sort exposed dental implant? local autograft a saviour!
topic Case Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4672862/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26668490
work_keys_str_mv AT rairaj exposeddentalimplantlocalautograftasaviour
AT pundeprashanta exposeddentalimplantlocalautograftasaviour
AT suryavanshiharshal exposeddentalimplantlocalautograftasaviour
AT shreeswetha exposeddentalimplantlocalautograftasaviour