Cargando…
Upfront molecular testing in patients with advanced gastro-esophageal cancer: Is it time yet?
INTRODUCTION: Targeting HER2 has improved outcomes in metastatic GE (mGE) cancer. In this study, we aim to explore the feasibility of molecular profiling in patients with refractory mGE cancer in routine clinical practice. METHODS: Archival formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) samples for patien...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Impact Journals LLC
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4673157/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26082439 |
_version_ | 1782404679318110208 |
---|---|
author | Mikhail, Sameh Ciombor, Kristen Noonan, Anne Wu, Christina Goldberg, Richard Zhao, Weiqiang Wei, Lai Mathey, Kristina Yereb, Melissa Timmers, Cynthia Bekaii-Saab, Tanios |
author_facet | Mikhail, Sameh Ciombor, Kristen Noonan, Anne Wu, Christina Goldberg, Richard Zhao, Weiqiang Wei, Lai Mathey, Kristina Yereb, Melissa Timmers, Cynthia Bekaii-Saab, Tanios |
author_sort | Mikhail, Sameh |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Targeting HER2 has improved outcomes in metastatic GE (mGE) cancer. In this study, we aim to explore the feasibility of molecular profiling in patients with refractory mGE cancer in routine clinical practice. METHODS: Archival formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) samples for patients with mGE were analyzed with commercially available targeted next generation sequencing (NGS) and/or FISH for MET amplification. We also reviewed the patients' medical records for concurrent HER 2 testing. RESULTS: Tumor samples from 99 patients with mGE cancer were analyzed as follows: NGS (N = 56), FISH for MET amplification (N = 65), IHC and/or FISH for HER2 (N = 87). Of patients who underwent NGS, 50/56 (89%) had at least one actionable molecular alteration. The most notable actionable alterations included cell cycle abnormalities (58%), HER2 amplification (30%), PI3KCA mutation (14%), MCL1 amplification (11%), PTEN loss (9%), CDH1 mutation (2%) and MET amplification (5%). Ninety-two percent (12/13) of patients with HER2 amplification by NGS were positive for HER2 by IHC and/or FISH. In contrast, only 12/18 (66%) patients positive for HER2 by IHC and/or FISH demonstrated HER2 amplification by NGS. CONCLUSION: Comprehensive molecular testing is feasible in clinical practice and provides a platform for screening patients for molecularly guided clinical trials and available targeted therapies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4673157 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Impact Journals LLC |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46731572015-12-23 Upfront molecular testing in patients with advanced gastro-esophageal cancer: Is it time yet? Mikhail, Sameh Ciombor, Kristen Noonan, Anne Wu, Christina Goldberg, Richard Zhao, Weiqiang Wei, Lai Mathey, Kristina Yereb, Melissa Timmers, Cynthia Bekaii-Saab, Tanios Oncotarget Research Paper INTRODUCTION: Targeting HER2 has improved outcomes in metastatic GE (mGE) cancer. In this study, we aim to explore the feasibility of molecular profiling in patients with refractory mGE cancer in routine clinical practice. METHODS: Archival formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) samples for patients with mGE were analyzed with commercially available targeted next generation sequencing (NGS) and/or FISH for MET amplification. We also reviewed the patients' medical records for concurrent HER 2 testing. RESULTS: Tumor samples from 99 patients with mGE cancer were analyzed as follows: NGS (N = 56), FISH for MET amplification (N = 65), IHC and/or FISH for HER2 (N = 87). Of patients who underwent NGS, 50/56 (89%) had at least one actionable molecular alteration. The most notable actionable alterations included cell cycle abnormalities (58%), HER2 amplification (30%), PI3KCA mutation (14%), MCL1 amplification (11%), PTEN loss (9%), CDH1 mutation (2%) and MET amplification (5%). Ninety-two percent (12/13) of patients with HER2 amplification by NGS were positive for HER2 by IHC and/or FISH. In contrast, only 12/18 (66%) patients positive for HER2 by IHC and/or FISH demonstrated HER2 amplification by NGS. CONCLUSION: Comprehensive molecular testing is feasible in clinical practice and provides a platform for screening patients for molecularly guided clinical trials and available targeted therapies. Impact Journals LLC 2015-06-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4673157/ /pubmed/26082439 Text en Copyright: © 2015 Mikhail et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Paper Mikhail, Sameh Ciombor, Kristen Noonan, Anne Wu, Christina Goldberg, Richard Zhao, Weiqiang Wei, Lai Mathey, Kristina Yereb, Melissa Timmers, Cynthia Bekaii-Saab, Tanios Upfront molecular testing in patients with advanced gastro-esophageal cancer: Is it time yet? |
title | Upfront molecular testing in patients with advanced gastro-esophageal cancer: Is it time yet? |
title_full | Upfront molecular testing in patients with advanced gastro-esophageal cancer: Is it time yet? |
title_fullStr | Upfront molecular testing in patients with advanced gastro-esophageal cancer: Is it time yet? |
title_full_unstemmed | Upfront molecular testing in patients with advanced gastro-esophageal cancer: Is it time yet? |
title_short | Upfront molecular testing in patients with advanced gastro-esophageal cancer: Is it time yet? |
title_sort | upfront molecular testing in patients with advanced gastro-esophageal cancer: is it time yet? |
topic | Research Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4673157/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26082439 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mikhailsameh upfrontmoleculartestinginpatientswithadvancedgastroesophagealcancerisittimeyet AT ciomborkristen upfrontmoleculartestinginpatientswithadvancedgastroesophagealcancerisittimeyet AT noonananne upfrontmoleculartestinginpatientswithadvancedgastroesophagealcancerisittimeyet AT wuchristina upfrontmoleculartestinginpatientswithadvancedgastroesophagealcancerisittimeyet AT goldbergrichard upfrontmoleculartestinginpatientswithadvancedgastroesophagealcancerisittimeyet AT zhaoweiqiang upfrontmoleculartestinginpatientswithadvancedgastroesophagealcancerisittimeyet AT weilai upfrontmoleculartestinginpatientswithadvancedgastroesophagealcancerisittimeyet AT matheykristina upfrontmoleculartestinginpatientswithadvancedgastroesophagealcancerisittimeyet AT yerebmelissa upfrontmoleculartestinginpatientswithadvancedgastroesophagealcancerisittimeyet AT timmerscynthia upfrontmoleculartestinginpatientswithadvancedgastroesophagealcancerisittimeyet AT bekaiisaabtanios upfrontmoleculartestinginpatientswithadvancedgastroesophagealcancerisittimeyet |