Cargando…

Upfront molecular testing in patients with advanced gastro-esophageal cancer: Is it time yet?

INTRODUCTION: Targeting HER2 has improved outcomes in metastatic GE (mGE) cancer. In this study, we aim to explore the feasibility of molecular profiling in patients with refractory mGE cancer in routine clinical practice. METHODS: Archival formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) samples for patien...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mikhail, Sameh, Ciombor, Kristen, Noonan, Anne, Wu, Christina, Goldberg, Richard, Zhao, Weiqiang, Wei, Lai, Mathey, Kristina, Yereb, Melissa, Timmers, Cynthia, Bekaii-Saab, Tanios
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Impact Journals LLC 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4673157/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26082439
_version_ 1782404679318110208
author Mikhail, Sameh
Ciombor, Kristen
Noonan, Anne
Wu, Christina
Goldberg, Richard
Zhao, Weiqiang
Wei, Lai
Mathey, Kristina
Yereb, Melissa
Timmers, Cynthia
Bekaii-Saab, Tanios
author_facet Mikhail, Sameh
Ciombor, Kristen
Noonan, Anne
Wu, Christina
Goldberg, Richard
Zhao, Weiqiang
Wei, Lai
Mathey, Kristina
Yereb, Melissa
Timmers, Cynthia
Bekaii-Saab, Tanios
author_sort Mikhail, Sameh
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Targeting HER2 has improved outcomes in metastatic GE (mGE) cancer. In this study, we aim to explore the feasibility of molecular profiling in patients with refractory mGE cancer in routine clinical practice. METHODS: Archival formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) samples for patients with mGE were analyzed with commercially available targeted next generation sequencing (NGS) and/or FISH for MET amplification. We also reviewed the patients' medical records for concurrent HER 2 testing. RESULTS: Tumor samples from 99 patients with mGE cancer were analyzed as follows: NGS (N = 56), FISH for MET amplification (N = 65), IHC and/or FISH for HER2 (N = 87). Of patients who underwent NGS, 50/56 (89%) had at least one actionable molecular alteration. The most notable actionable alterations included cell cycle abnormalities (58%), HER2 amplification (30%), PI3KCA mutation (14%), MCL1 amplification (11%), PTEN loss (9%), CDH1 mutation (2%) and MET amplification (5%). Ninety-two percent (12/13) of patients with HER2 amplification by NGS were positive for HER2 by IHC and/or FISH. In contrast, only 12/18 (66%) patients positive for HER2 by IHC and/or FISH demonstrated HER2 amplification by NGS. CONCLUSION: Comprehensive molecular testing is feasible in clinical practice and provides a platform for screening patients for molecularly guided clinical trials and available targeted therapies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4673157
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Impact Journals LLC
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46731572015-12-23 Upfront molecular testing in patients with advanced gastro-esophageal cancer: Is it time yet? Mikhail, Sameh Ciombor, Kristen Noonan, Anne Wu, Christina Goldberg, Richard Zhao, Weiqiang Wei, Lai Mathey, Kristina Yereb, Melissa Timmers, Cynthia Bekaii-Saab, Tanios Oncotarget Research Paper INTRODUCTION: Targeting HER2 has improved outcomes in metastatic GE (mGE) cancer. In this study, we aim to explore the feasibility of molecular profiling in patients with refractory mGE cancer in routine clinical practice. METHODS: Archival formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) samples for patients with mGE were analyzed with commercially available targeted next generation sequencing (NGS) and/or FISH for MET amplification. We also reviewed the patients' medical records for concurrent HER 2 testing. RESULTS: Tumor samples from 99 patients with mGE cancer were analyzed as follows: NGS (N = 56), FISH for MET amplification (N = 65), IHC and/or FISH for HER2 (N = 87). Of patients who underwent NGS, 50/56 (89%) had at least one actionable molecular alteration. The most notable actionable alterations included cell cycle abnormalities (58%), HER2 amplification (30%), PI3KCA mutation (14%), MCL1 amplification (11%), PTEN loss (9%), CDH1 mutation (2%) and MET amplification (5%). Ninety-two percent (12/13) of patients with HER2 amplification by NGS were positive for HER2 by IHC and/or FISH. In contrast, only 12/18 (66%) patients positive for HER2 by IHC and/or FISH demonstrated HER2 amplification by NGS. CONCLUSION: Comprehensive molecular testing is feasible in clinical practice and provides a platform for screening patients for molecularly guided clinical trials and available targeted therapies. Impact Journals LLC 2015-06-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4673157/ /pubmed/26082439 Text en Copyright: © 2015 Mikhail et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Paper
Mikhail, Sameh
Ciombor, Kristen
Noonan, Anne
Wu, Christina
Goldberg, Richard
Zhao, Weiqiang
Wei, Lai
Mathey, Kristina
Yereb, Melissa
Timmers, Cynthia
Bekaii-Saab, Tanios
Upfront molecular testing in patients with advanced gastro-esophageal cancer: Is it time yet?
title Upfront molecular testing in patients with advanced gastro-esophageal cancer: Is it time yet?
title_full Upfront molecular testing in patients with advanced gastro-esophageal cancer: Is it time yet?
title_fullStr Upfront molecular testing in patients with advanced gastro-esophageal cancer: Is it time yet?
title_full_unstemmed Upfront molecular testing in patients with advanced gastro-esophageal cancer: Is it time yet?
title_short Upfront molecular testing in patients with advanced gastro-esophageal cancer: Is it time yet?
title_sort upfront molecular testing in patients with advanced gastro-esophageal cancer: is it time yet?
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4673157/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26082439
work_keys_str_mv AT mikhailsameh upfrontmoleculartestinginpatientswithadvancedgastroesophagealcancerisittimeyet
AT ciomborkristen upfrontmoleculartestinginpatientswithadvancedgastroesophagealcancerisittimeyet
AT noonananne upfrontmoleculartestinginpatientswithadvancedgastroesophagealcancerisittimeyet
AT wuchristina upfrontmoleculartestinginpatientswithadvancedgastroesophagealcancerisittimeyet
AT goldbergrichard upfrontmoleculartestinginpatientswithadvancedgastroesophagealcancerisittimeyet
AT zhaoweiqiang upfrontmoleculartestinginpatientswithadvancedgastroesophagealcancerisittimeyet
AT weilai upfrontmoleculartestinginpatientswithadvancedgastroesophagealcancerisittimeyet
AT matheykristina upfrontmoleculartestinginpatientswithadvancedgastroesophagealcancerisittimeyet
AT yerebmelissa upfrontmoleculartestinginpatientswithadvancedgastroesophagealcancerisittimeyet
AT timmerscynthia upfrontmoleculartestinginpatientswithadvancedgastroesophagealcancerisittimeyet
AT bekaiisaabtanios upfrontmoleculartestinginpatientswithadvancedgastroesophagealcancerisittimeyet