Cargando…
Aesthetic Emotions and Aesthetic People: Openness Predicts Sensitivity to Novelty in the Experiences of Interest and Pleasure
There is a stable relationship between the Openness/Intellect domain of personality and aesthetic engagement. However, neither of these are simple constructs and while the relationship exists, process based evidence explaining the relationship is still lacking. This research sought to clarify the re...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4673303/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26696940 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01877 |
_version_ | 1782404712340914176 |
---|---|
author | Fayn, Kirill MacCann, Carolyn Tiliopoulos, Niko Silvia, Paul J. |
author_facet | Fayn, Kirill MacCann, Carolyn Tiliopoulos, Niko Silvia, Paul J. |
author_sort | Fayn, Kirill |
collection | PubMed |
description | There is a stable relationship between the Openness/Intellect domain of personality and aesthetic engagement. However, neither of these are simple constructs and while the relationship exists, process based evidence explaining the relationship is still lacking. This research sought to clarify the relationship by evaluating the influence of the Openness and Intellect aspects on several different aesthetic emotions. Two studies looked at the between- and within-person differences in arousal and the emotions of interest, pleasure and confusion in response to visual art. The results suggest that Openness, as opposed to Intellect, was predictive of greater arousal, interest and pleasure, while both aspects explained less confusion. Differences in Openness were associated with within-person emotion appraisal contingencies, particularly greater novelty-interest and novelty-pleasure relationships. Those higher in Openness were particularly influenced by novelty in artworks. For pleasure this relationship suggested a different qualitative structure of appraisals. The appraisal of novelty is part of the experience of pleasure for those high in Openness, but not those low in Openness. This research supports the utility of studying Openness and Intellect as separate aspects of the broad domain and clarifies the relationship between Openness and aesthetic states in terms of within-person appraisal processes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4673303 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46733032015-12-22 Aesthetic Emotions and Aesthetic People: Openness Predicts Sensitivity to Novelty in the Experiences of Interest and Pleasure Fayn, Kirill MacCann, Carolyn Tiliopoulos, Niko Silvia, Paul J. Front Psychol Psychology There is a stable relationship between the Openness/Intellect domain of personality and aesthetic engagement. However, neither of these are simple constructs and while the relationship exists, process based evidence explaining the relationship is still lacking. This research sought to clarify the relationship by evaluating the influence of the Openness and Intellect aspects on several different aesthetic emotions. Two studies looked at the between- and within-person differences in arousal and the emotions of interest, pleasure and confusion in response to visual art. The results suggest that Openness, as opposed to Intellect, was predictive of greater arousal, interest and pleasure, while both aspects explained less confusion. Differences in Openness were associated with within-person emotion appraisal contingencies, particularly greater novelty-interest and novelty-pleasure relationships. Those higher in Openness were particularly influenced by novelty in artworks. For pleasure this relationship suggested a different qualitative structure of appraisals. The appraisal of novelty is part of the experience of pleasure for those high in Openness, but not those low in Openness. This research supports the utility of studying Openness and Intellect as separate aspects of the broad domain and clarifies the relationship between Openness and aesthetic states in terms of within-person appraisal processes. Frontiers Media S.A. 2015-12-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4673303/ /pubmed/26696940 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01877 Text en Copyright © 2015 Fayn, MacCann, Tiliopoulos and Silvia. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Fayn, Kirill MacCann, Carolyn Tiliopoulos, Niko Silvia, Paul J. Aesthetic Emotions and Aesthetic People: Openness Predicts Sensitivity to Novelty in the Experiences of Interest and Pleasure |
title | Aesthetic Emotions and Aesthetic People: Openness Predicts Sensitivity to Novelty in the Experiences of Interest and Pleasure |
title_full | Aesthetic Emotions and Aesthetic People: Openness Predicts Sensitivity to Novelty in the Experiences of Interest and Pleasure |
title_fullStr | Aesthetic Emotions and Aesthetic People: Openness Predicts Sensitivity to Novelty in the Experiences of Interest and Pleasure |
title_full_unstemmed | Aesthetic Emotions and Aesthetic People: Openness Predicts Sensitivity to Novelty in the Experiences of Interest and Pleasure |
title_short | Aesthetic Emotions and Aesthetic People: Openness Predicts Sensitivity to Novelty in the Experiences of Interest and Pleasure |
title_sort | aesthetic emotions and aesthetic people: openness predicts sensitivity to novelty in the experiences of interest and pleasure |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4673303/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26696940 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01877 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT faynkirill aestheticemotionsandaestheticpeopleopennesspredictssensitivitytonoveltyintheexperiencesofinterestandpleasure AT maccanncarolyn aestheticemotionsandaestheticpeopleopennesspredictssensitivitytonoveltyintheexperiencesofinterestandpleasure AT tiliopoulosniko aestheticemotionsandaestheticpeopleopennesspredictssensitivitytonoveltyintheexperiencesofinterestandpleasure AT silviapaulj aestheticemotionsandaestheticpeopleopennesspredictssensitivitytonoveltyintheexperiencesofinterestandpleasure |