Cargando…

Aesthetic Emotions and Aesthetic People: Openness Predicts Sensitivity to Novelty in the Experiences of Interest and Pleasure

There is a stable relationship between the Openness/Intellect domain of personality and aesthetic engagement. However, neither of these are simple constructs and while the relationship exists, process based evidence explaining the relationship is still lacking. This research sought to clarify the re...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fayn, Kirill, MacCann, Carolyn, Tiliopoulos, Niko, Silvia, Paul J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4673303/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26696940
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01877
_version_ 1782404712340914176
author Fayn, Kirill
MacCann, Carolyn
Tiliopoulos, Niko
Silvia, Paul J.
author_facet Fayn, Kirill
MacCann, Carolyn
Tiliopoulos, Niko
Silvia, Paul J.
author_sort Fayn, Kirill
collection PubMed
description There is a stable relationship between the Openness/Intellect domain of personality and aesthetic engagement. However, neither of these are simple constructs and while the relationship exists, process based evidence explaining the relationship is still lacking. This research sought to clarify the relationship by evaluating the influence of the Openness and Intellect aspects on several different aesthetic emotions. Two studies looked at the between- and within-person differences in arousal and the emotions of interest, pleasure and confusion in response to visual art. The results suggest that Openness, as opposed to Intellect, was predictive of greater arousal, interest and pleasure, while both aspects explained less confusion. Differences in Openness were associated with within-person emotion appraisal contingencies, particularly greater novelty-interest and novelty-pleasure relationships. Those higher in Openness were particularly influenced by novelty in artworks. For pleasure this relationship suggested a different qualitative structure of appraisals. The appraisal of novelty is part of the experience of pleasure for those high in Openness, but not those low in Openness. This research supports the utility of studying Openness and Intellect as separate aspects of the broad domain and clarifies the relationship between Openness and aesthetic states in terms of within-person appraisal processes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4673303
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46733032015-12-22 Aesthetic Emotions and Aesthetic People: Openness Predicts Sensitivity to Novelty in the Experiences of Interest and Pleasure Fayn, Kirill MacCann, Carolyn Tiliopoulos, Niko Silvia, Paul J. Front Psychol Psychology There is a stable relationship between the Openness/Intellect domain of personality and aesthetic engagement. However, neither of these are simple constructs and while the relationship exists, process based evidence explaining the relationship is still lacking. This research sought to clarify the relationship by evaluating the influence of the Openness and Intellect aspects on several different aesthetic emotions. Two studies looked at the between- and within-person differences in arousal and the emotions of interest, pleasure and confusion in response to visual art. The results suggest that Openness, as opposed to Intellect, was predictive of greater arousal, interest and pleasure, while both aspects explained less confusion. Differences in Openness were associated with within-person emotion appraisal contingencies, particularly greater novelty-interest and novelty-pleasure relationships. Those higher in Openness were particularly influenced by novelty in artworks. For pleasure this relationship suggested a different qualitative structure of appraisals. The appraisal of novelty is part of the experience of pleasure for those high in Openness, but not those low in Openness. This research supports the utility of studying Openness and Intellect as separate aspects of the broad domain and clarifies the relationship between Openness and aesthetic states in terms of within-person appraisal processes. Frontiers Media S.A. 2015-12-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4673303/ /pubmed/26696940 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01877 Text en Copyright © 2015 Fayn, MacCann, Tiliopoulos and Silvia. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Fayn, Kirill
MacCann, Carolyn
Tiliopoulos, Niko
Silvia, Paul J.
Aesthetic Emotions and Aesthetic People: Openness Predicts Sensitivity to Novelty in the Experiences of Interest and Pleasure
title Aesthetic Emotions and Aesthetic People: Openness Predicts Sensitivity to Novelty in the Experiences of Interest and Pleasure
title_full Aesthetic Emotions and Aesthetic People: Openness Predicts Sensitivity to Novelty in the Experiences of Interest and Pleasure
title_fullStr Aesthetic Emotions and Aesthetic People: Openness Predicts Sensitivity to Novelty in the Experiences of Interest and Pleasure
title_full_unstemmed Aesthetic Emotions and Aesthetic People: Openness Predicts Sensitivity to Novelty in the Experiences of Interest and Pleasure
title_short Aesthetic Emotions and Aesthetic People: Openness Predicts Sensitivity to Novelty in the Experiences of Interest and Pleasure
title_sort aesthetic emotions and aesthetic people: openness predicts sensitivity to novelty in the experiences of interest and pleasure
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4673303/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26696940
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01877
work_keys_str_mv AT faynkirill aestheticemotionsandaestheticpeopleopennesspredictssensitivitytonoveltyintheexperiencesofinterestandpleasure
AT maccanncarolyn aestheticemotionsandaestheticpeopleopennesspredictssensitivitytonoveltyintheexperiencesofinterestandpleasure
AT tiliopoulosniko aestheticemotionsandaestheticpeopleopennesspredictssensitivitytonoveltyintheexperiencesofinterestandpleasure
AT silviapaulj aestheticemotionsandaestheticpeopleopennesspredictssensitivitytonoveltyintheexperiencesofinterestandpleasure