Cargando…

Urinary catheters: history, current status, adverse events and research agenda

For more than 3500 years, urinary catheters have been used to drain the bladder when it fails to empty. For people with impaired bladder function and for whom the method is feasible, clean intermittent self-catheterization is the optimal procedure. For those who require an indwelling catheter, wheth...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Feneley, Roger C. L., Hopley, Ian B., Wells, Peter N. T.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Informa Healthcare 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4673556/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26383168
http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/03091902.2015.1085600
_version_ 1782404762597064704
author Feneley, Roger C. L.
Hopley, Ian B.
Wells, Peter N. T.
author_facet Feneley, Roger C. L.
Hopley, Ian B.
Wells, Peter N. T.
author_sort Feneley, Roger C. L.
collection PubMed
description For more than 3500 years, urinary catheters have been used to drain the bladder when it fails to empty. For people with impaired bladder function and for whom the method is feasible, clean intermittent self-catheterization is the optimal procedure. For those who require an indwelling catheter, whether short- or long-term, the self-retaining Foley catheter is invariably used, as it has been since its introduction nearly 80 years ago, despite the fact that this catheter can cause bacterial colonization, recurrent and chronic infections, bladder stones and septicaemia, damage to the kidneys, the bladder and the urethra, and contribute to the development of antibiotic resistance. In terms of medical, social and economic resources, the burden of urinary retention and incontinence, aggravated by the use of the Foley catheter, is huge. In the UK, the harm resulting from the use of the Foley catheter costs the National Health Service between £1.0–2.5 billion and accounts for ∼2100 deaths per year. Therefore, there is an urgent need for the development of an alternative indwelling catheter system. The research agenda is for the new catheter to be easy and safe to insert, either urethrally or suprapubically, to be retained reliably in the bladder and to be withdrawn easily and safely when necessary, to mimic natural physiology by filling at low pressure and emptying completely without damage to the bladder, and to have control mechanisms appropriate for all users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4673556
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Informa Healthcare
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46735562015-12-15 Urinary catheters: history, current status, adverse events and research agenda Feneley, Roger C. L. Hopley, Ian B. Wells, Peter N. T. J Med Eng Technol Review Article For more than 3500 years, urinary catheters have been used to drain the bladder when it fails to empty. For people with impaired bladder function and for whom the method is feasible, clean intermittent self-catheterization is the optimal procedure. For those who require an indwelling catheter, whether short- or long-term, the self-retaining Foley catheter is invariably used, as it has been since its introduction nearly 80 years ago, despite the fact that this catheter can cause bacterial colonization, recurrent and chronic infections, bladder stones and septicaemia, damage to the kidneys, the bladder and the urethra, and contribute to the development of antibiotic resistance. In terms of medical, social and economic resources, the burden of urinary retention and incontinence, aggravated by the use of the Foley catheter, is huge. In the UK, the harm resulting from the use of the Foley catheter costs the National Health Service between £1.0–2.5 billion and accounts for ∼2100 deaths per year. Therefore, there is an urgent need for the development of an alternative indwelling catheter system. The research agenda is for the new catheter to be easy and safe to insert, either urethrally or suprapubically, to be retained reliably in the bladder and to be withdrawn easily and safely when necessary, to mimic natural physiology by filling at low pressure and emptying completely without damage to the bladder, and to have control mechanisms appropriate for all users. Informa Healthcare 2015-11-17 2015-09-18 /pmc/articles/PMC4673556/ /pubmed/26383168 http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/03091902.2015.1085600 Text en © 2015 The Author(s). Published by Taylor & Francis. http://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, and is not altered, transformed, or built upon in any way.
spellingShingle Review Article
Feneley, Roger C. L.
Hopley, Ian B.
Wells, Peter N. T.
Urinary catheters: history, current status, adverse events and research agenda
title Urinary catheters: history, current status, adverse events and research agenda
title_full Urinary catheters: history, current status, adverse events and research agenda
title_fullStr Urinary catheters: history, current status, adverse events and research agenda
title_full_unstemmed Urinary catheters: history, current status, adverse events and research agenda
title_short Urinary catheters: history, current status, adverse events and research agenda
title_sort urinary catheters: history, current status, adverse events and research agenda
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4673556/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26383168
http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/03091902.2015.1085600
work_keys_str_mv AT feneleyrogercl urinarycathetershistorycurrentstatusadverseeventsandresearchagenda
AT hopleyianb urinarycathetershistorycurrentstatusadverseeventsandresearchagenda
AT wellspeternt urinarycathetershistorycurrentstatusadverseeventsandresearchagenda