Cargando…
Unexpected diversity of Anopheles species in Eastern Zambia: implications for evaluating vector behavior and interventions using molecular tools
The understanding of malaria vector species in association with their bionomic traits is vital for targeting malaria interventions and measuring effectiveness. Many entomological studies rely on morphological identification of mosquitoes, limiting recognition to visually distinct species/species gro...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4673690/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26648001 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep17952 |
_version_ | 1782404786511937536 |
---|---|
author | Lobo, Neil F. Laurent, Brandyce St. Sikaala, Chadwick H. Hamainza, Busiku Chanda, Javan Chinula, Dingani Krishnankutty, Sindhu M. Mueller, Jonathan D. Deason, Nicholas A. Hoang, Quynh T. Boldt, Heather L. Thumloup, Julie Stevenson, Jennifer Seyoum, Aklilu Collins, Frank H. |
author_facet | Lobo, Neil F. Laurent, Brandyce St. Sikaala, Chadwick H. Hamainza, Busiku Chanda, Javan Chinula, Dingani Krishnankutty, Sindhu M. Mueller, Jonathan D. Deason, Nicholas A. Hoang, Quynh T. Boldt, Heather L. Thumloup, Julie Stevenson, Jennifer Seyoum, Aklilu Collins, Frank H. |
author_sort | Lobo, Neil F. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The understanding of malaria vector species in association with their bionomic traits is vital for targeting malaria interventions and measuring effectiveness. Many entomological studies rely on morphological identification of mosquitoes, limiting recognition to visually distinct species/species groups. Anopheles species assignments based on ribosomal DNA ITS2 and mitochondrial DNA COI were compared to morphological identifications from Luangwa and Nyimba districts in Zambia. The comparison of morphological and molecular identifications determined that interpretations of species compositions, insecticide resistance assays, host preference studies, trap efficacy, and Plasmodium infections were incorrect when using morphological identification alone. Morphological identifications recognized eight Anopheles species while 18 distinct sequence groups or species were identified from molecular analyses. Of these 18, seven could not be identified through comparison to published sequences. Twelve of 18 molecularly identified species (including unidentifiable species and species not thought to be vectors) were found by PCR to carry Plasmodium sporozoites - compared to four of eight morphological species. Up to 15% of morphologically identified Anopheles funestus mosquitoes in insecticide resistance tests were found to be other species molecularly. The comprehension of primary and secondary malaria vectors and bionomic characteristics that impact malaria transmission and intervention effectiveness are fundamental in achieving malaria elimination. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4673690 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46736902015-12-14 Unexpected diversity of Anopheles species in Eastern Zambia: implications for evaluating vector behavior and interventions using molecular tools Lobo, Neil F. Laurent, Brandyce St. Sikaala, Chadwick H. Hamainza, Busiku Chanda, Javan Chinula, Dingani Krishnankutty, Sindhu M. Mueller, Jonathan D. Deason, Nicholas A. Hoang, Quynh T. Boldt, Heather L. Thumloup, Julie Stevenson, Jennifer Seyoum, Aklilu Collins, Frank H. Sci Rep Article The understanding of malaria vector species in association with their bionomic traits is vital for targeting malaria interventions and measuring effectiveness. Many entomological studies rely on morphological identification of mosquitoes, limiting recognition to visually distinct species/species groups. Anopheles species assignments based on ribosomal DNA ITS2 and mitochondrial DNA COI were compared to morphological identifications from Luangwa and Nyimba districts in Zambia. The comparison of morphological and molecular identifications determined that interpretations of species compositions, insecticide resistance assays, host preference studies, trap efficacy, and Plasmodium infections were incorrect when using morphological identification alone. Morphological identifications recognized eight Anopheles species while 18 distinct sequence groups or species were identified from molecular analyses. Of these 18, seven could not be identified through comparison to published sequences. Twelve of 18 molecularly identified species (including unidentifiable species and species not thought to be vectors) were found by PCR to carry Plasmodium sporozoites - compared to four of eight morphological species. Up to 15% of morphologically identified Anopheles funestus mosquitoes in insecticide resistance tests were found to be other species molecularly. The comprehension of primary and secondary malaria vectors and bionomic characteristics that impact malaria transmission and intervention effectiveness are fundamental in achieving malaria elimination. Nature Publishing Group 2015-12-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4673690/ /pubmed/26648001 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep17952 Text en Copyright © 2015, Macmillan Publishers Limited http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Article Lobo, Neil F. Laurent, Brandyce St. Sikaala, Chadwick H. Hamainza, Busiku Chanda, Javan Chinula, Dingani Krishnankutty, Sindhu M. Mueller, Jonathan D. Deason, Nicholas A. Hoang, Quynh T. Boldt, Heather L. Thumloup, Julie Stevenson, Jennifer Seyoum, Aklilu Collins, Frank H. Unexpected diversity of Anopheles species in Eastern Zambia: implications for evaluating vector behavior and interventions using molecular tools |
title | Unexpected diversity of Anopheles species in Eastern Zambia: implications for evaluating vector behavior and interventions using molecular tools |
title_full | Unexpected diversity of Anopheles species in Eastern Zambia: implications for evaluating vector behavior and interventions using molecular tools |
title_fullStr | Unexpected diversity of Anopheles species in Eastern Zambia: implications for evaluating vector behavior and interventions using molecular tools |
title_full_unstemmed | Unexpected diversity of Anopheles species in Eastern Zambia: implications for evaluating vector behavior and interventions using molecular tools |
title_short | Unexpected diversity of Anopheles species in Eastern Zambia: implications for evaluating vector behavior and interventions using molecular tools |
title_sort | unexpected diversity of anopheles species in eastern zambia: implications for evaluating vector behavior and interventions using molecular tools |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4673690/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26648001 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep17952 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT loboneilf unexpecteddiversityofanophelesspeciesineasternzambiaimplicationsforevaluatingvectorbehaviorandinterventionsusingmoleculartools AT laurentbrandycest unexpecteddiversityofanophelesspeciesineasternzambiaimplicationsforevaluatingvectorbehaviorandinterventionsusingmoleculartools AT sikaalachadwickh unexpecteddiversityofanophelesspeciesineasternzambiaimplicationsforevaluatingvectorbehaviorandinterventionsusingmoleculartools AT hamainzabusiku unexpecteddiversityofanophelesspeciesineasternzambiaimplicationsforevaluatingvectorbehaviorandinterventionsusingmoleculartools AT chandajavan unexpecteddiversityofanophelesspeciesineasternzambiaimplicationsforevaluatingvectorbehaviorandinterventionsusingmoleculartools AT chinuladingani unexpecteddiversityofanophelesspeciesineasternzambiaimplicationsforevaluatingvectorbehaviorandinterventionsusingmoleculartools AT krishnankuttysindhum unexpecteddiversityofanophelesspeciesineasternzambiaimplicationsforevaluatingvectorbehaviorandinterventionsusingmoleculartools AT muellerjonathand unexpecteddiversityofanophelesspeciesineasternzambiaimplicationsforevaluatingvectorbehaviorandinterventionsusingmoleculartools AT deasonnicholasa unexpecteddiversityofanophelesspeciesineasternzambiaimplicationsforevaluatingvectorbehaviorandinterventionsusingmoleculartools AT hoangquynht unexpecteddiversityofanophelesspeciesineasternzambiaimplicationsforevaluatingvectorbehaviorandinterventionsusingmoleculartools AT boldtheatherl unexpecteddiversityofanophelesspeciesineasternzambiaimplicationsforevaluatingvectorbehaviorandinterventionsusingmoleculartools AT thumloupjulie unexpecteddiversityofanophelesspeciesineasternzambiaimplicationsforevaluatingvectorbehaviorandinterventionsusingmoleculartools AT stevensonjennifer unexpecteddiversityofanophelesspeciesineasternzambiaimplicationsforevaluatingvectorbehaviorandinterventionsusingmoleculartools AT seyoumaklilu unexpecteddiversityofanophelesspeciesineasternzambiaimplicationsforevaluatingvectorbehaviorandinterventionsusingmoleculartools AT collinsfrankh unexpecteddiversityofanophelesspeciesineasternzambiaimplicationsforevaluatingvectorbehaviorandinterventionsusingmoleculartools |