Cargando…

Characterizing the vulnerability of frequent emergency department users by applying a conceptual framework: a controlled, cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND: Frequent emergency department (ED) users meet several of the criteria of vulnerability, but this needs to be further examined taking into consideration all vulnerability’s different dimensions. This study aimed to characterize frequent ED users and to define risk factors of frequent ED u...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bodenmann, Patrick, Baggio, Stéphanie, Iglesias, Katia, Althaus, Fabrice, Velonaki, Venetia-Sofia, Stucki, Stephanie, Ansermet, Corine, Paroz, Sophie, Trueb, Lionel, Hugli, Olivier, Griffin, Judith L., Daeppen, Jean-Bernard
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4673736/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26645272
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12939-015-0277-5
_version_ 1782404797003988992
author Bodenmann, Patrick
Baggio, Stéphanie
Iglesias, Katia
Althaus, Fabrice
Velonaki, Venetia-Sofia
Stucki, Stephanie
Ansermet, Corine
Paroz, Sophie
Trueb, Lionel
Hugli, Olivier
Griffin, Judith L.
Daeppen, Jean-Bernard
author_facet Bodenmann, Patrick
Baggio, Stéphanie
Iglesias, Katia
Althaus, Fabrice
Velonaki, Venetia-Sofia
Stucki, Stephanie
Ansermet, Corine
Paroz, Sophie
Trueb, Lionel
Hugli, Olivier
Griffin, Judith L.
Daeppen, Jean-Bernard
author_sort Bodenmann, Patrick
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Frequent emergency department (ED) users meet several of the criteria of vulnerability, but this needs to be further examined taking into consideration all vulnerability’s different dimensions. This study aimed to characterize frequent ED users and to define risk factors of frequent ED use within a universal health care coverage system, applying a conceptual framework of vulnerability. METHODS: A controlled, cross-sectional study comparing frequent ED users to a control group of non-frequent users was conducted at the Lausanne University Hospital, Switzerland. Frequent users were defined as patients with five or more visits to the ED in the previous 12 months. The two groups were compared using validated scales for each one of the five dimensions of an innovative conceptual framework: socio-demographic characteristics; somatic, mental, and risk-behavior indicators; and use of health care services. Independent t-tests, Wilcoxon rank-sum tests, Pearson’s Chi-squared test and Fisher’s exact test were used for the comparison. To examine the -related to vulnerability- risk factors for being a frequent ED user, univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were used. RESULTS: We compared 226 frequent users and 173 controls. Frequent users had more vulnerabilities in all five dimensions of the conceptual framework. They were younger, and more often immigrants from low/middle-income countries or unemployed, had more somatic and psychiatric comorbidities, were more often tobacco users, and had more primary care physician (PCP) visits. The most significant frequent ED use risk factors were a history of more than three hospital admissions in the previous 12 months (adj OR:23.2, 95%CI = 9.1-59.2), the absence of a PCP (adj OR:8.4, 95%CI = 2.1-32.7), living less than 5 km from an ED (adj OR:4.4, 95%CI = 2.1-9.0), and household income lower than USD 2,800/month (adj OR:4.3, 95%CI = 2.0-9.2). CONCLUSIONS: Frequent ED users within a universal health coverage system form a highly vulnerable population, when taking into account all five dimensions of a conceptual framework of vulnerability. The predictive factors identified could be useful in the early detection of future frequent users, in order to address their specific needs and decrease vulnerability, a key priority for health care policy makers. Application of the conceptual framework in future research is warranted. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12939-015-0277-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4673736
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46737362015-12-10 Characterizing the vulnerability of frequent emergency department users by applying a conceptual framework: a controlled, cross-sectional study Bodenmann, Patrick Baggio, Stéphanie Iglesias, Katia Althaus, Fabrice Velonaki, Venetia-Sofia Stucki, Stephanie Ansermet, Corine Paroz, Sophie Trueb, Lionel Hugli, Olivier Griffin, Judith L. Daeppen, Jean-Bernard Int J Equity Health Research BACKGROUND: Frequent emergency department (ED) users meet several of the criteria of vulnerability, but this needs to be further examined taking into consideration all vulnerability’s different dimensions. This study aimed to characterize frequent ED users and to define risk factors of frequent ED use within a universal health care coverage system, applying a conceptual framework of vulnerability. METHODS: A controlled, cross-sectional study comparing frequent ED users to a control group of non-frequent users was conducted at the Lausanne University Hospital, Switzerland. Frequent users were defined as patients with five or more visits to the ED in the previous 12 months. The two groups were compared using validated scales for each one of the five dimensions of an innovative conceptual framework: socio-demographic characteristics; somatic, mental, and risk-behavior indicators; and use of health care services. Independent t-tests, Wilcoxon rank-sum tests, Pearson’s Chi-squared test and Fisher’s exact test were used for the comparison. To examine the -related to vulnerability- risk factors for being a frequent ED user, univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were used. RESULTS: We compared 226 frequent users and 173 controls. Frequent users had more vulnerabilities in all five dimensions of the conceptual framework. They were younger, and more often immigrants from low/middle-income countries or unemployed, had more somatic and psychiatric comorbidities, were more often tobacco users, and had more primary care physician (PCP) visits. The most significant frequent ED use risk factors were a history of more than three hospital admissions in the previous 12 months (adj OR:23.2, 95%CI = 9.1-59.2), the absence of a PCP (adj OR:8.4, 95%CI = 2.1-32.7), living less than 5 km from an ED (adj OR:4.4, 95%CI = 2.1-9.0), and household income lower than USD 2,800/month (adj OR:4.3, 95%CI = 2.0-9.2). CONCLUSIONS: Frequent ED users within a universal health coverage system form a highly vulnerable population, when taking into account all five dimensions of a conceptual framework of vulnerability. The predictive factors identified could be useful in the early detection of future frequent users, in order to address their specific needs and decrease vulnerability, a key priority for health care policy makers. Application of the conceptual framework in future research is warranted. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12939-015-0277-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-12-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4673736/ /pubmed/26645272 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12939-015-0277-5 Text en © Bodenmann et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Bodenmann, Patrick
Baggio, Stéphanie
Iglesias, Katia
Althaus, Fabrice
Velonaki, Venetia-Sofia
Stucki, Stephanie
Ansermet, Corine
Paroz, Sophie
Trueb, Lionel
Hugli, Olivier
Griffin, Judith L.
Daeppen, Jean-Bernard
Characterizing the vulnerability of frequent emergency department users by applying a conceptual framework: a controlled, cross-sectional study
title Characterizing the vulnerability of frequent emergency department users by applying a conceptual framework: a controlled, cross-sectional study
title_full Characterizing the vulnerability of frequent emergency department users by applying a conceptual framework: a controlled, cross-sectional study
title_fullStr Characterizing the vulnerability of frequent emergency department users by applying a conceptual framework: a controlled, cross-sectional study
title_full_unstemmed Characterizing the vulnerability of frequent emergency department users by applying a conceptual framework: a controlled, cross-sectional study
title_short Characterizing the vulnerability of frequent emergency department users by applying a conceptual framework: a controlled, cross-sectional study
title_sort characterizing the vulnerability of frequent emergency department users by applying a conceptual framework: a controlled, cross-sectional study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4673736/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26645272
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12939-015-0277-5
work_keys_str_mv AT bodenmannpatrick characterizingthevulnerabilityoffrequentemergencydepartmentusersbyapplyingaconceptualframeworkacontrolledcrosssectionalstudy
AT baggiostephanie characterizingthevulnerabilityoffrequentemergencydepartmentusersbyapplyingaconceptualframeworkacontrolledcrosssectionalstudy
AT iglesiaskatia characterizingthevulnerabilityoffrequentemergencydepartmentusersbyapplyingaconceptualframeworkacontrolledcrosssectionalstudy
AT althausfabrice characterizingthevulnerabilityoffrequentemergencydepartmentusersbyapplyingaconceptualframeworkacontrolledcrosssectionalstudy
AT velonakivenetiasofia characterizingthevulnerabilityoffrequentemergencydepartmentusersbyapplyingaconceptualframeworkacontrolledcrosssectionalstudy
AT stuckistephanie characterizingthevulnerabilityoffrequentemergencydepartmentusersbyapplyingaconceptualframeworkacontrolledcrosssectionalstudy
AT ansermetcorine characterizingthevulnerabilityoffrequentemergencydepartmentusersbyapplyingaconceptualframeworkacontrolledcrosssectionalstudy
AT parozsophie characterizingthevulnerabilityoffrequentemergencydepartmentusersbyapplyingaconceptualframeworkacontrolledcrosssectionalstudy
AT trueblionel characterizingthevulnerabilityoffrequentemergencydepartmentusersbyapplyingaconceptualframeworkacontrolledcrosssectionalstudy
AT hugliolivier characterizingthevulnerabilityoffrequentemergencydepartmentusersbyapplyingaconceptualframeworkacontrolledcrosssectionalstudy
AT griffinjudithl characterizingthevulnerabilityoffrequentemergencydepartmentusersbyapplyingaconceptualframeworkacontrolledcrosssectionalstudy
AT daeppenjeanbernard characterizingthevulnerabilityoffrequentemergencydepartmentusersbyapplyingaconceptualframeworkacontrolledcrosssectionalstudy