Cargando…
Efficacy and safety of extracorporeal shock wave therapy for orthopedic conditions: a systematic review on studies listed in the PEDro database
BACKGROUND: Extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) is an effective and safe non-invasive treatment option for tendon and other pathologies of the musculoskeletal system. SOURCES OF DATA: This systematic review used data derived from the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro; www.pedro.org.au, 23...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4674007/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26585999 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bmb/ldv047 |
Sumario: | BACKGROUND: Extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) is an effective and safe non-invasive treatment option for tendon and other pathologies of the musculoskeletal system. SOURCES OF DATA: This systematic review used data derived from the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro; www.pedro.org.au, 23 October 2015, date last accessed). AREAS OF AGREEMENT: ESWT is effective and safe. An optimum treatment protocol for ESWT appears to be three treatment sessions at 1-week intervals, with 2000 impulses per session and the highest energy flux density the patient can tolerate. AREAS OF CONTROVERSY: The distinction between radial ESWT as ‘low-energy ESWT’ and focused ESWT as ‘high-energy ESWT’ is not correct and should be abandoned. GROWING POINTS: There is no scientific evidence in favour of either radial ESWT or focused ESWT with respect to treatment outcome. AREAS TIMELY FOR DEVELOPING RESEARCH: Future randomized controlled trials should primarily address systematic tests of the aforementioned optimum treatment protocol and direct comparisons between radial and focused ESWT. |
---|