Cargando…

Do Differential Response Rates to Patient Surveys Between Organizations Lead to Unfair Performance Comparisons?: Evidence From the English Cancer Patient Experience Survey

BACKGROUND: Patient surveys typically have variable response rates between organizations, leading to concerns that such differences may affect the validity of performance comparisons. OBJECTIVE: To explore the size and likely sources of associations between hospital-level survey response rates and p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Saunders, Catherine L., Elliott, Marc N., Lyratzopoulos, Georgios, Abel, Gary A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4674144/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26595223
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0000000000000457
_version_ 1782404867570008064
author Saunders, Catherine L.
Elliott, Marc N.
Lyratzopoulos, Georgios
Abel, Gary A.
author_facet Saunders, Catherine L.
Elliott, Marc N.
Lyratzopoulos, Georgios
Abel, Gary A.
author_sort Saunders, Catherine L.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Patient surveys typically have variable response rates between organizations, leading to concerns that such differences may affect the validity of performance comparisons. OBJECTIVE: To explore the size and likely sources of associations between hospital-level survey response rates and patient experience. RESEARCH DESIGN, SUBJECTS, AND MEASURES: Cross-sectional mail survey including 60 patient experience items sent to 101,771 cancer survivors recently treated by 158 English NHS hospitals. Age, sex, race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status, clinical diagnosis, hospital type, and region were available for respondents and nonrespondents. RESULTS: The overall response rate was 67% (range, 39% to 77% between hospitals). Hospitals with higher response rates had higher scores for all items (Spearman correlation range, 0.03–0.44), particularly questions regarding hospital-level administrative processes, for example, procedure cancellations or medical note availability. From multivariable analysis, associations between individual patient experience and hospital-level response rates were statistically significant (P<0.05) for 53/59 analyzed questions, decreasing to 37/59 after adjusting for case-mix, and 25/59 after further adjusting for hospital-level characteristics. Predicting responses of nonrespondents, and re-estimating hypothetical hospital scores assuming a 100% response rate, we found that currently low performing hospitals would have attained even lower scores. Overall nationwide attainment would have decreased slightly to that currently observed. CONCLUSIONS: Higher response rate hospitals have more positive experience scores, and this is only partly explained by patient case-mix. High response rates may be a marker of efficient hospital administration, and higher quality that should not, therefore, be adjusted away in public reporting. Although nonresponse may result in slightly overestimating overall national levels of performance, it does not appear to meaningfully bias comparisons of case-mix-adjusted hospital results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4674144
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46741442015-12-21 Do Differential Response Rates to Patient Surveys Between Organizations Lead to Unfair Performance Comparisons?: Evidence From the English Cancer Patient Experience Survey Saunders, Catherine L. Elliott, Marc N. Lyratzopoulos, Georgios Abel, Gary A. Med Care Original Articles BACKGROUND: Patient surveys typically have variable response rates between organizations, leading to concerns that such differences may affect the validity of performance comparisons. OBJECTIVE: To explore the size and likely sources of associations between hospital-level survey response rates and patient experience. RESEARCH DESIGN, SUBJECTS, AND MEASURES: Cross-sectional mail survey including 60 patient experience items sent to 101,771 cancer survivors recently treated by 158 English NHS hospitals. Age, sex, race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status, clinical diagnosis, hospital type, and region were available for respondents and nonrespondents. RESULTS: The overall response rate was 67% (range, 39% to 77% between hospitals). Hospitals with higher response rates had higher scores for all items (Spearman correlation range, 0.03–0.44), particularly questions regarding hospital-level administrative processes, for example, procedure cancellations or medical note availability. From multivariable analysis, associations between individual patient experience and hospital-level response rates were statistically significant (P<0.05) for 53/59 analyzed questions, decreasing to 37/59 after adjusting for case-mix, and 25/59 after further adjusting for hospital-level characteristics. Predicting responses of nonrespondents, and re-estimating hypothetical hospital scores assuming a 100% response rate, we found that currently low performing hospitals would have attained even lower scores. Overall nationwide attainment would have decreased slightly to that currently observed. CONCLUSIONS: Higher response rate hospitals have more positive experience scores, and this is only partly explained by patient case-mix. High response rates may be a marker of efficient hospital administration, and higher quality that should not, therefore, be adjusted away in public reporting. Although nonresponse may result in slightly overestimating overall national levels of performance, it does not appear to meaningfully bias comparisons of case-mix-adjusted hospital results. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2016-01 2015-12-18 /pmc/articles/PMC4674144/ /pubmed/26595223 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0000000000000457 Text en Copyright © 2015 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Saunders, Catherine L.
Elliott, Marc N.
Lyratzopoulos, Georgios
Abel, Gary A.
Do Differential Response Rates to Patient Surveys Between Organizations Lead to Unfair Performance Comparisons?: Evidence From the English Cancer Patient Experience Survey
title Do Differential Response Rates to Patient Surveys Between Organizations Lead to Unfair Performance Comparisons?: Evidence From the English Cancer Patient Experience Survey
title_full Do Differential Response Rates to Patient Surveys Between Organizations Lead to Unfair Performance Comparisons?: Evidence From the English Cancer Patient Experience Survey
title_fullStr Do Differential Response Rates to Patient Surveys Between Organizations Lead to Unfair Performance Comparisons?: Evidence From the English Cancer Patient Experience Survey
title_full_unstemmed Do Differential Response Rates to Patient Surveys Between Organizations Lead to Unfair Performance Comparisons?: Evidence From the English Cancer Patient Experience Survey
title_short Do Differential Response Rates to Patient Surveys Between Organizations Lead to Unfair Performance Comparisons?: Evidence From the English Cancer Patient Experience Survey
title_sort do differential response rates to patient surveys between organizations lead to unfair performance comparisons?: evidence from the english cancer patient experience survey
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4674144/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26595223
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0000000000000457
work_keys_str_mv AT saunderscatherinel dodifferentialresponseratestopatientsurveysbetweenorganizationsleadtounfairperformancecomparisonsevidencefromtheenglishcancerpatientexperiencesurvey
AT elliottmarcn dodifferentialresponseratestopatientsurveysbetweenorganizationsleadtounfairperformancecomparisonsevidencefromtheenglishcancerpatientexperiencesurvey
AT lyratzopoulosgeorgios dodifferentialresponseratestopatientsurveysbetweenorganizationsleadtounfairperformancecomparisonsevidencefromtheenglishcancerpatientexperiencesurvey
AT abelgarya dodifferentialresponseratestopatientsurveysbetweenorganizationsleadtounfairperformancecomparisonsevidencefromtheenglishcancerpatientexperiencesurvey