Cargando…

Local Tumor Control and Normal Tissue Toxicity of Pulsed Low-Dose Rate Radiotherapy for Recurrent Lung Cancer: An In Vivo Animal Study

OBJECTIVES: This study investigates (1) local tumor control and (2) normal tissue toxicity of pulsed low-dose rate radiotherapy (PLDR) for recurrent lung cancer. METHODS: For study 1, nude mice were implanted with A549 tumors and divided into the following 3 groups: (1) control (n = 10), (2) convent...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Peng, Wang, Bin, Chen, Xiaoming, Cvetkovic, Dusica, Chen, Lili, Lang, Jinyi, Ma, C.-M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4674173/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26675811
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1559325815588507
_version_ 1782404872755216384
author Zhang, Peng
Wang, Bin
Chen, Xiaoming
Cvetkovic, Dusica
Chen, Lili
Lang, Jinyi
Ma, C.-M.
author_facet Zhang, Peng
Wang, Bin
Chen, Xiaoming
Cvetkovic, Dusica
Chen, Lili
Lang, Jinyi
Ma, C.-M.
author_sort Zhang, Peng
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: This study investigates (1) local tumor control and (2) normal tissue toxicity of pulsed low-dose rate radiotherapy (PLDR) for recurrent lung cancer. METHODS: For study 1, nude mice were implanted with A549 tumors and divided into the following 3 groups: (1) control (n = 10), (2) conventional radiotherapy (RT; n = 10), and (3) PLDR (n = 10). Tumor-bearing mice received 2 Gy daily dose for 2 consecutive days. Weekly magnetic resonance imaging was used for tumor growth monitoring. For study 2, 20 mice received 8 Gy total body irradiation either continuously (n = 10) or 40 × 0.2 Gy pulses with 3-minute intervals (n = 10). RESULTS: For study 1, both conventional RT and PLDR significantly inhibited the growth of A549 xenografts compared with the control group (>35% difference in the mean tumor volume; P < .05). The PLDR results were slightly better than conventional RT (8% difference in the mean tumor volume; P > .05). For study 2, the average weight was 20.94 ± 1.68 g and 25.69 ± 1.27 g and the survival time was 8 days and 12 days for mice treated with conventional RT and PLDR (P < .05), respectively. CONCLUSION: This study showed that PLDR could control A549 tumors as effectively as conventional RT, and PLDR induced much less normal tissue toxicity than conventional RT. Thus, PLDR would be a good modality for recurrent lung cancers. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: This article reports our results of an in vivo animal investigation of PLDR for the treatment of recurrent cancers, which may not be eligible for treatment because of the dose limitations on nearby healthy organs that have been irradiated in previous treatments. This was the first in vivo study to quantify the tumor control and normal tissue toxicities of PLDR using mice with implanted tumors, and our findings provided evidence to support the clinical trials that employ PLDR treatment techniques.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4674173
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46741732015-12-15 Local Tumor Control and Normal Tissue Toxicity of Pulsed Low-Dose Rate Radiotherapy for Recurrent Lung Cancer: An In Vivo Animal Study Zhang, Peng Wang, Bin Chen, Xiaoming Cvetkovic, Dusica Chen, Lili Lang, Jinyi Ma, C.-M. Dose Response Article OBJECTIVES: This study investigates (1) local tumor control and (2) normal tissue toxicity of pulsed low-dose rate radiotherapy (PLDR) for recurrent lung cancer. METHODS: For study 1, nude mice were implanted with A549 tumors and divided into the following 3 groups: (1) control (n = 10), (2) conventional radiotherapy (RT; n = 10), and (3) PLDR (n = 10). Tumor-bearing mice received 2 Gy daily dose for 2 consecutive days. Weekly magnetic resonance imaging was used for tumor growth monitoring. For study 2, 20 mice received 8 Gy total body irradiation either continuously (n = 10) or 40 × 0.2 Gy pulses with 3-minute intervals (n = 10). RESULTS: For study 1, both conventional RT and PLDR significantly inhibited the growth of A549 xenografts compared with the control group (>35% difference in the mean tumor volume; P < .05). The PLDR results were slightly better than conventional RT (8% difference in the mean tumor volume; P > .05). For study 2, the average weight was 20.94 ± 1.68 g and 25.69 ± 1.27 g and the survival time was 8 days and 12 days for mice treated with conventional RT and PLDR (P < .05), respectively. CONCLUSION: This study showed that PLDR could control A549 tumors as effectively as conventional RT, and PLDR induced much less normal tissue toxicity than conventional RT. Thus, PLDR would be a good modality for recurrent lung cancers. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: This article reports our results of an in vivo animal investigation of PLDR for the treatment of recurrent cancers, which may not be eligible for treatment because of the dose limitations on nearby healthy organs that have been irradiated in previous treatments. This was the first in vivo study to quantify the tumor control and normal tissue toxicities of PLDR using mice with implanted tumors, and our findings provided evidence to support the clinical trials that employ PLDR treatment techniques. SAGE Publications 2015-05-25 /pmc/articles/PMC4674173/ /pubmed/26675811 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1559325815588507 Text en © The Author(s) 2015 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (http://www.uk.sagepub.com/aboutus/openaccess.htm).
spellingShingle Article
Zhang, Peng
Wang, Bin
Chen, Xiaoming
Cvetkovic, Dusica
Chen, Lili
Lang, Jinyi
Ma, C.-M.
Local Tumor Control and Normal Tissue Toxicity of Pulsed Low-Dose Rate Radiotherapy for Recurrent Lung Cancer: An In Vivo Animal Study
title Local Tumor Control and Normal Tissue Toxicity of Pulsed Low-Dose Rate Radiotherapy for Recurrent Lung Cancer: An In Vivo Animal Study
title_full Local Tumor Control and Normal Tissue Toxicity of Pulsed Low-Dose Rate Radiotherapy for Recurrent Lung Cancer: An In Vivo Animal Study
title_fullStr Local Tumor Control and Normal Tissue Toxicity of Pulsed Low-Dose Rate Radiotherapy for Recurrent Lung Cancer: An In Vivo Animal Study
title_full_unstemmed Local Tumor Control and Normal Tissue Toxicity of Pulsed Low-Dose Rate Radiotherapy for Recurrent Lung Cancer: An In Vivo Animal Study
title_short Local Tumor Control and Normal Tissue Toxicity of Pulsed Low-Dose Rate Radiotherapy for Recurrent Lung Cancer: An In Vivo Animal Study
title_sort local tumor control and normal tissue toxicity of pulsed low-dose rate radiotherapy for recurrent lung cancer: an in vivo animal study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4674173/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26675811
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1559325815588507
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangpeng localtumorcontrolandnormaltissuetoxicityofpulsedlowdoserateradiotherapyforrecurrentlungcanceraninvivoanimalstudy
AT wangbin localtumorcontrolandnormaltissuetoxicityofpulsedlowdoserateradiotherapyforrecurrentlungcanceraninvivoanimalstudy
AT chenxiaoming localtumorcontrolandnormaltissuetoxicityofpulsedlowdoserateradiotherapyforrecurrentlungcanceraninvivoanimalstudy
AT cvetkovicdusica localtumorcontrolandnormaltissuetoxicityofpulsedlowdoserateradiotherapyforrecurrentlungcanceraninvivoanimalstudy
AT chenlili localtumorcontrolandnormaltissuetoxicityofpulsedlowdoserateradiotherapyforrecurrentlungcanceraninvivoanimalstudy
AT langjinyi localtumorcontrolandnormaltissuetoxicityofpulsedlowdoserateradiotherapyforrecurrentlungcanceraninvivoanimalstudy
AT macm localtumorcontrolandnormaltissuetoxicityofpulsedlowdoserateradiotherapyforrecurrentlungcanceraninvivoanimalstudy