Cargando…

Review and Evaluation of Hand–Arm Coordinate Systems for Measuring Vibration Exposure, Biodynamic Responses, and Hand Forces

The hand coordinate systems for measuring vibration exposures and biodynamic responses have been standardized, but they are not actually used in many studies. This contradicts the purpose of the standardization. The objectives of this study were to identify the major sources of this problem, and to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dong, Ren G., Sinsel, Erik W., Welcome, Daniel E., Warren, Christopher, Xu, Xueyan S., McDowell, Thomas W., Wu, John Z.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Occupational Safety and Health Research Institute 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4674512/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26929824
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.shaw.2015.05.003
_version_ 1782404906157604864
author Dong, Ren G.
Sinsel, Erik W.
Welcome, Daniel E.
Warren, Christopher
Xu, Xueyan S.
McDowell, Thomas W.
Wu, John Z.
author_facet Dong, Ren G.
Sinsel, Erik W.
Welcome, Daniel E.
Warren, Christopher
Xu, Xueyan S.
McDowell, Thomas W.
Wu, John Z.
author_sort Dong, Ren G.
collection PubMed
description The hand coordinate systems for measuring vibration exposures and biodynamic responses have been standardized, but they are not actually used in many studies. This contradicts the purpose of the standardization. The objectives of this study were to identify the major sources of this problem, and to help define or identify better coordinate systems for the standardization. This study systematically reviewed the principles and definition methods, and evaluated typical hand coordinate systems. This study confirms that, as accelerometers remain the major technology for vibration measurement, it is reasonable to standardize two types of coordinate systems: a tool-based basicentric (BC) system and an anatomically based biodynamic (BD) system. However, these coordinate systems are not well defined in the current standard. Definition of the standard BC system is confusing, and it can be interpreted differently; as a result, it has been inconsistently applied in various standards and studies. The standard hand BD system is defined using the orientation of the third metacarpal bone. It is neither convenient nor defined based on important biological or biodynamic features. This explains why it is rarely used in practice. To resolve these inconsistencies and deficiencies, we proposed a revised method for defining the realistic handle BC system and an alternative method for defining the hand BD system. A fingertip-based BD system for measuring the principal grip force is also proposed based on an important feature of the grip force confirmed in this study.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4674512
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Occupational Safety and Health Research Institute
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46745122016-02-29 Review and Evaluation of Hand–Arm Coordinate Systems for Measuring Vibration Exposure, Biodynamic Responses, and Hand Forces Dong, Ren G. Sinsel, Erik W. Welcome, Daniel E. Warren, Christopher Xu, Xueyan S. McDowell, Thomas W. Wu, John Z. Saf Health Work Review Article The hand coordinate systems for measuring vibration exposures and biodynamic responses have been standardized, but they are not actually used in many studies. This contradicts the purpose of the standardization. The objectives of this study were to identify the major sources of this problem, and to help define or identify better coordinate systems for the standardization. This study systematically reviewed the principles and definition methods, and evaluated typical hand coordinate systems. This study confirms that, as accelerometers remain the major technology for vibration measurement, it is reasonable to standardize two types of coordinate systems: a tool-based basicentric (BC) system and an anatomically based biodynamic (BD) system. However, these coordinate systems are not well defined in the current standard. Definition of the standard BC system is confusing, and it can be interpreted differently; as a result, it has been inconsistently applied in various standards and studies. The standard hand BD system is defined using the orientation of the third metacarpal bone. It is neither convenient nor defined based on important biological or biodynamic features. This explains why it is rarely used in practice. To resolve these inconsistencies and deficiencies, we proposed a revised method for defining the realistic handle BC system and an alternative method for defining the hand BD system. A fingertip-based BD system for measuring the principal grip force is also proposed based on an important feature of the grip force confirmed in this study. Occupational Safety and Health Research Institute 2015-09 2015-06-19 /pmc/articles/PMC4674512/ /pubmed/26929824 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.shaw.2015.05.003 Text en Copyright © 2015, Occupational Safety and Health Research Institute. Published by Elsevier Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review Article
Dong, Ren G.
Sinsel, Erik W.
Welcome, Daniel E.
Warren, Christopher
Xu, Xueyan S.
McDowell, Thomas W.
Wu, John Z.
Review and Evaluation of Hand–Arm Coordinate Systems for Measuring Vibration Exposure, Biodynamic Responses, and Hand Forces
title Review and Evaluation of Hand–Arm Coordinate Systems for Measuring Vibration Exposure, Biodynamic Responses, and Hand Forces
title_full Review and Evaluation of Hand–Arm Coordinate Systems for Measuring Vibration Exposure, Biodynamic Responses, and Hand Forces
title_fullStr Review and Evaluation of Hand–Arm Coordinate Systems for Measuring Vibration Exposure, Biodynamic Responses, and Hand Forces
title_full_unstemmed Review and Evaluation of Hand–Arm Coordinate Systems for Measuring Vibration Exposure, Biodynamic Responses, and Hand Forces
title_short Review and Evaluation of Hand–Arm Coordinate Systems for Measuring Vibration Exposure, Biodynamic Responses, and Hand Forces
title_sort review and evaluation of hand–arm coordinate systems for measuring vibration exposure, biodynamic responses, and hand forces
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4674512/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26929824
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.shaw.2015.05.003
work_keys_str_mv AT dongreng reviewandevaluationofhandarmcoordinatesystemsformeasuringvibrationexposurebiodynamicresponsesandhandforces
AT sinselerikw reviewandevaluationofhandarmcoordinatesystemsformeasuringvibrationexposurebiodynamicresponsesandhandforces
AT welcomedaniele reviewandevaluationofhandarmcoordinatesystemsformeasuringvibrationexposurebiodynamicresponsesandhandforces
AT warrenchristopher reviewandevaluationofhandarmcoordinatesystemsformeasuringvibrationexposurebiodynamicresponsesandhandforces
AT xuxueyans reviewandevaluationofhandarmcoordinatesystemsformeasuringvibrationexposurebiodynamicresponsesandhandforces
AT mcdowellthomasw reviewandevaluationofhandarmcoordinatesystemsformeasuringvibrationexposurebiodynamicresponsesandhandforces
AT wujohnz reviewandevaluationofhandarmcoordinatesystemsformeasuringvibrationexposurebiodynamicresponsesandhandforces