Cargando…

Physician and Pharmacist Understanding of the Risk of Urinary Retention with Retigabine (Ezogabine): A REMS Assessment Survey

BACKGROUND: The Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) for retigabine/ezogabine (RTG/EZG) required an evaluation of the effectiveness of the communication plan to communicate about the risks with use of RTG/EZG. OBJECTIVE: GlaxoSmithKline conducted a survey to assess understanding of the ris...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ishihara, Lianna, Beck, Melissa, Travis, Sara, Akintayo, Olusegun, Brickel, Neil
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4674522/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26690543
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40801-015-0042-5
_version_ 1782404907738857472
author Ishihara, Lianna
Beck, Melissa
Travis, Sara
Akintayo, Olusegun
Brickel, Neil
author_facet Ishihara, Lianna
Beck, Melissa
Travis, Sara
Akintayo, Olusegun
Brickel, Neil
author_sort Ishihara, Lianna
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) for retigabine/ezogabine (RTG/EZG) required an evaluation of the effectiveness of the communication plan to communicate about the risks with use of RTG/EZG. OBJECTIVE: GlaxoSmithKline conducted a survey to assess understanding of the risk of urinary retention (UR) with RTG/EZG and to evaluate the effectiveness of the communication plan. METHODS: This was a US-based, cross-sectional, non-interventional, observational survey, conducted from February to April 2013, of physicians who had prescribed RTG/EZG in the past year, and pharmacists who had dispensed an antiepileptic drug within the past 3 months. Thirteen primary objective questions (five specific to UR risk) were included in the survey, which assessed healthcare professionals’ (HCPs’) understanding of UR risk and symptoms of acute UR associated with RTG/EZG. The primary outcome was the proportion of HCPs correctly answering each question. For each question, a proportion of correct responses ≥80 % was considered to represent sufficient understanding of associated risks. RESULTS: Of 1028 HCPs screened, 373 participated. Six of 13 questions (3/5 specific to UR risk) met the ≥80 % threshold for correct responses in the physician cohort. No questions achieved this threshold in the total pharmacist group; however, four questions scored ≥80 % when stratified by pharmacists who had dispensed RTG/EZG. CONCLUSIONS: Results demonstrated a mixed level of understanding of aspects of UR risk associated with RTG/EZG, although some risk questions did not meet the 80 % threshold, especially among pharmacists. This is likely to have been due to the short time that RTG/EZG has been available and its limited use. This study provides the first evaluation of the REMS communication plan on the risk of UR with RTG/EZG. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s40801-015-0042-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4674522
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46745222015-12-17 Physician and Pharmacist Understanding of the Risk of Urinary Retention with Retigabine (Ezogabine): A REMS Assessment Survey Ishihara, Lianna Beck, Melissa Travis, Sara Akintayo, Olusegun Brickel, Neil Drugs Real World Outcomes Short Communication BACKGROUND: The Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) for retigabine/ezogabine (RTG/EZG) required an evaluation of the effectiveness of the communication plan to communicate about the risks with use of RTG/EZG. OBJECTIVE: GlaxoSmithKline conducted a survey to assess understanding of the risk of urinary retention (UR) with RTG/EZG and to evaluate the effectiveness of the communication plan. METHODS: This was a US-based, cross-sectional, non-interventional, observational survey, conducted from February to April 2013, of physicians who had prescribed RTG/EZG in the past year, and pharmacists who had dispensed an antiepileptic drug within the past 3 months. Thirteen primary objective questions (five specific to UR risk) were included in the survey, which assessed healthcare professionals’ (HCPs’) understanding of UR risk and symptoms of acute UR associated with RTG/EZG. The primary outcome was the proportion of HCPs correctly answering each question. For each question, a proportion of correct responses ≥80 % was considered to represent sufficient understanding of associated risks. RESULTS: Of 1028 HCPs screened, 373 participated. Six of 13 questions (3/5 specific to UR risk) met the ≥80 % threshold for correct responses in the physician cohort. No questions achieved this threshold in the total pharmacist group; however, four questions scored ≥80 % when stratified by pharmacists who had dispensed RTG/EZG. CONCLUSIONS: Results demonstrated a mixed level of understanding of aspects of UR risk associated with RTG/EZG, although some risk questions did not meet the 80 % threshold, especially among pharmacists. This is likely to have been due to the short time that RTG/EZG has been available and its limited use. This study provides the first evaluation of the REMS communication plan on the risk of UR with RTG/EZG. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s40801-015-0042-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2015-10-07 /pmc/articles/PMC4674522/ /pubmed/26690543 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40801-015-0042-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Short Communication
Ishihara, Lianna
Beck, Melissa
Travis, Sara
Akintayo, Olusegun
Brickel, Neil
Physician and Pharmacist Understanding of the Risk of Urinary Retention with Retigabine (Ezogabine): A REMS Assessment Survey
title Physician and Pharmacist Understanding of the Risk of Urinary Retention with Retigabine (Ezogabine): A REMS Assessment Survey
title_full Physician and Pharmacist Understanding of the Risk of Urinary Retention with Retigabine (Ezogabine): A REMS Assessment Survey
title_fullStr Physician and Pharmacist Understanding of the Risk of Urinary Retention with Retigabine (Ezogabine): A REMS Assessment Survey
title_full_unstemmed Physician and Pharmacist Understanding of the Risk of Urinary Retention with Retigabine (Ezogabine): A REMS Assessment Survey
title_short Physician and Pharmacist Understanding of the Risk of Urinary Retention with Retigabine (Ezogabine): A REMS Assessment Survey
title_sort physician and pharmacist understanding of the risk of urinary retention with retigabine (ezogabine): a rems assessment survey
topic Short Communication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4674522/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26690543
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40801-015-0042-5
work_keys_str_mv AT ishiharalianna physicianandpharmacistunderstandingoftheriskofurinaryretentionwithretigabineezogabinearemsassessmentsurvey
AT beckmelissa physicianandpharmacistunderstandingoftheriskofurinaryretentionwithretigabineezogabinearemsassessmentsurvey
AT travissara physicianandpharmacistunderstandingoftheriskofurinaryretentionwithretigabineezogabinearemsassessmentsurvey
AT akintayoolusegun physicianandpharmacistunderstandingoftheriskofurinaryretentionwithretigabineezogabinearemsassessmentsurvey
AT brickelneil physicianandpharmacistunderstandingoftheriskofurinaryretentionwithretigabineezogabinearemsassessmentsurvey