Cargando…

Structural vs. functional mechanisms of duplicate gene loss following whole genome doubling

BACKGROUND: The loss of duplicate genes - fractionation - after whole genome doubling (WGD) is the subject to a debate as to whether it proceeds gene by gene or through deletion of multi-gene chromosomal segments. RESULTS: WGD produces two copies of every chromosome, namely two identical copies of a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sankoff, David, Zheng, Chunfang, Wang, Baoyong, Abad Najar, Carlos Fernando Buen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4674901/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26680009
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-16-S17-S9
_version_ 1782404970737303552
author Sankoff, David
Zheng, Chunfang
Wang, Baoyong
Abad Najar, Carlos Fernando Buen
author_facet Sankoff, David
Zheng, Chunfang
Wang, Baoyong
Abad Najar, Carlos Fernando Buen
author_sort Sankoff, David
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The loss of duplicate genes - fractionation - after whole genome doubling (WGD) is the subject to a debate as to whether it proceeds gene by gene or through deletion of multi-gene chromosomal segments. RESULTS: WGD produces two copies of every chromosome, namely two identical copies of a sequence of genes. We assume deletion events excise a geometrically distributed number of consecutive genes with mean µ ≥ 1, and these events can combine to produce single-copy runs of length l. If µ = 1, the process is gene-by-gene. If µ > 1, the process at least occasionally excises more than one gene at a time. In the latter case if deletions overlap, the later one simply extends the existing run of single-copy genes. We explore aspects of the predicted distribution of the lengths of single-copy regions analytically, but resort to simulations to show how observing run lengths l allows us to discriminate between the two hypotheses. CONCLUSIONS: Deletion run length distributions can discriminate between gene-by-gene fractionation and deletion of segments of geometrically distributed length, even if µ is only slightly larger than 1, as long as the genome is large enough and fractionation has not proceeded too far towards completion.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4674901
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46749012015-12-15 Structural vs. functional mechanisms of duplicate gene loss following whole genome doubling Sankoff, David Zheng, Chunfang Wang, Baoyong Abad Najar, Carlos Fernando Buen BMC Bioinformatics Research BACKGROUND: The loss of duplicate genes - fractionation - after whole genome doubling (WGD) is the subject to a debate as to whether it proceeds gene by gene or through deletion of multi-gene chromosomal segments. RESULTS: WGD produces two copies of every chromosome, namely two identical copies of a sequence of genes. We assume deletion events excise a geometrically distributed number of consecutive genes with mean µ ≥ 1, and these events can combine to produce single-copy runs of length l. If µ = 1, the process is gene-by-gene. If µ > 1, the process at least occasionally excises more than one gene at a time. In the latter case if deletions overlap, the later one simply extends the existing run of single-copy genes. We explore aspects of the predicted distribution of the lengths of single-copy regions analytically, but resort to simulations to show how observing run lengths l allows us to discriminate between the two hypotheses. CONCLUSIONS: Deletion run length distributions can discriminate between gene-by-gene fractionation and deletion of segments of geometrically distributed length, even if µ is only slightly larger than 1, as long as the genome is large enough and fractionation has not proceeded too far towards completion. BioMed Central 2015-12-07 /pmc/articles/PMC4674901/ /pubmed/26680009 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-16-S17-S9 Text en Copyright © 2015 Sankoff et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Sankoff, David
Zheng, Chunfang
Wang, Baoyong
Abad Najar, Carlos Fernando Buen
Structural vs. functional mechanisms of duplicate gene loss following whole genome doubling
title Structural vs. functional mechanisms of duplicate gene loss following whole genome doubling
title_full Structural vs. functional mechanisms of duplicate gene loss following whole genome doubling
title_fullStr Structural vs. functional mechanisms of duplicate gene loss following whole genome doubling
title_full_unstemmed Structural vs. functional mechanisms of duplicate gene loss following whole genome doubling
title_short Structural vs. functional mechanisms of duplicate gene loss following whole genome doubling
title_sort structural vs. functional mechanisms of duplicate gene loss following whole genome doubling
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4674901/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26680009
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-16-S17-S9
work_keys_str_mv AT sankoffdavid structuralvsfunctionalmechanismsofduplicategenelossfollowingwholegenomedoubling
AT zhengchunfang structuralvsfunctionalmechanismsofduplicategenelossfollowingwholegenomedoubling
AT wangbaoyong structuralvsfunctionalmechanismsofduplicategenelossfollowingwholegenomedoubling
AT abadnajarcarlosfernandobuen structuralvsfunctionalmechanismsofduplicategenelossfollowingwholegenomedoubling