Cargando…

Combining multiple ECG features does not improve prediction of defibrillation outcome compared to single features in a large population of out-of-hospital cardiac arrests

INTRODUCTION: Quantitative electrocardiographic (ECG) waveform analysis provides a noninvasive reflection of the metabolic milieu of the myocardium during resuscitation and is a potentially useful tool to optimize the defibrillation strategy. However, whether combining multiple ECG features can impr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: He, Mi, Gong, Yushun, Li, Yongqin, Mauri, Tommaso, Fumagalli, Francesca, Bozzola, Marcella, Cesana, Giancarlo, Latini, Roberto, Pesenti, Antonio, Ristagno, Giuseppe
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4674958/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26652159
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-015-1142-z
_version_ 1782404983128326144
author He, Mi
Gong, Yushun
Li, Yongqin
Mauri, Tommaso
Fumagalli, Francesca
Bozzola, Marcella
Cesana, Giancarlo
Latini, Roberto
Pesenti, Antonio
Ristagno, Giuseppe
author_facet He, Mi
Gong, Yushun
Li, Yongqin
Mauri, Tommaso
Fumagalli, Francesca
Bozzola, Marcella
Cesana, Giancarlo
Latini, Roberto
Pesenti, Antonio
Ristagno, Giuseppe
author_sort He, Mi
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Quantitative electrocardiographic (ECG) waveform analysis provides a noninvasive reflection of the metabolic milieu of the myocardium during resuscitation and is a potentially useful tool to optimize the defibrillation strategy. However, whether combining multiple ECG features can improve the capability of defibrillation outcome prediction in comparison to single feature analysis is still uncertain. METHODS: A total of 3828 defibrillations from 1617 patients who experienced out-of-hospital cardiac arrest were analyzed. A 2.048-s ECG trace prior to each defibrillation without chest compressions was used for the analysis. Sixteen predictive features were optimized through the training dataset that included 2447 shocks from 1050 patients. Logistic regression, neural network and support vector machine were used to combine multiple features for the prediction of defibrillation outcome. Performance between single and combined predictive features were compared by area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and prediction accuracy (PA) on a validation dataset that consisted of 1381 shocks from 567 patients. RESULTS: Among the single features, mean slope (MS) outperformed other methods with an AUC of 0.876. Combination of complementary features using neural network resulted in the highest AUC of 0.874 among the multifeature-based methods. Compared to MS, no statistical difference was observed in AUC, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and PA when multiple features were considered. CONCLUSIONS: In this large dataset, the amplitude-related features achieved better defibrillation outcome prediction capability than other features. Combinations of multiple electrical features did not further improve prediction performance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4674958
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46749582015-12-11 Combining multiple ECG features does not improve prediction of defibrillation outcome compared to single features in a large population of out-of-hospital cardiac arrests He, Mi Gong, Yushun Li, Yongqin Mauri, Tommaso Fumagalli, Francesca Bozzola, Marcella Cesana, Giancarlo Latini, Roberto Pesenti, Antonio Ristagno, Giuseppe Crit Care Research INTRODUCTION: Quantitative electrocardiographic (ECG) waveform analysis provides a noninvasive reflection of the metabolic milieu of the myocardium during resuscitation and is a potentially useful tool to optimize the defibrillation strategy. However, whether combining multiple ECG features can improve the capability of defibrillation outcome prediction in comparison to single feature analysis is still uncertain. METHODS: A total of 3828 defibrillations from 1617 patients who experienced out-of-hospital cardiac arrest were analyzed. A 2.048-s ECG trace prior to each defibrillation without chest compressions was used for the analysis. Sixteen predictive features were optimized through the training dataset that included 2447 shocks from 1050 patients. Logistic regression, neural network and support vector machine were used to combine multiple features for the prediction of defibrillation outcome. Performance between single and combined predictive features were compared by area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and prediction accuracy (PA) on a validation dataset that consisted of 1381 shocks from 567 patients. RESULTS: Among the single features, mean slope (MS) outperformed other methods with an AUC of 0.876. Combination of complementary features using neural network resulted in the highest AUC of 0.874 among the multifeature-based methods. Compared to MS, no statistical difference was observed in AUC, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and PA when multiple features were considered. CONCLUSIONS: In this large dataset, the amplitude-related features achieved better defibrillation outcome prediction capability than other features. Combinations of multiple electrical features did not further improve prediction performance. BioMed Central 2015-12-10 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4674958/ /pubmed/26652159 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-015-1142-z Text en © He et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
He, Mi
Gong, Yushun
Li, Yongqin
Mauri, Tommaso
Fumagalli, Francesca
Bozzola, Marcella
Cesana, Giancarlo
Latini, Roberto
Pesenti, Antonio
Ristagno, Giuseppe
Combining multiple ECG features does not improve prediction of defibrillation outcome compared to single features in a large population of out-of-hospital cardiac arrests
title Combining multiple ECG features does not improve prediction of defibrillation outcome compared to single features in a large population of out-of-hospital cardiac arrests
title_full Combining multiple ECG features does not improve prediction of defibrillation outcome compared to single features in a large population of out-of-hospital cardiac arrests
title_fullStr Combining multiple ECG features does not improve prediction of defibrillation outcome compared to single features in a large population of out-of-hospital cardiac arrests
title_full_unstemmed Combining multiple ECG features does not improve prediction of defibrillation outcome compared to single features in a large population of out-of-hospital cardiac arrests
title_short Combining multiple ECG features does not improve prediction of defibrillation outcome compared to single features in a large population of out-of-hospital cardiac arrests
title_sort combining multiple ecg features does not improve prediction of defibrillation outcome compared to single features in a large population of out-of-hospital cardiac arrests
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4674958/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26652159
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-015-1142-z
work_keys_str_mv AT hemi combiningmultipleecgfeaturesdoesnotimprovepredictionofdefibrillationoutcomecomparedtosinglefeaturesinalargepopulationofoutofhospitalcardiacarrests
AT gongyushun combiningmultipleecgfeaturesdoesnotimprovepredictionofdefibrillationoutcomecomparedtosinglefeaturesinalargepopulationofoutofhospitalcardiacarrests
AT liyongqin combiningmultipleecgfeaturesdoesnotimprovepredictionofdefibrillationoutcomecomparedtosinglefeaturesinalargepopulationofoutofhospitalcardiacarrests
AT mauritommaso combiningmultipleecgfeaturesdoesnotimprovepredictionofdefibrillationoutcomecomparedtosinglefeaturesinalargepopulationofoutofhospitalcardiacarrests
AT fumagallifrancesca combiningmultipleecgfeaturesdoesnotimprovepredictionofdefibrillationoutcomecomparedtosinglefeaturesinalargepopulationofoutofhospitalcardiacarrests
AT bozzolamarcella combiningmultipleecgfeaturesdoesnotimprovepredictionofdefibrillationoutcomecomparedtosinglefeaturesinalargepopulationofoutofhospitalcardiacarrests
AT cesanagiancarlo combiningmultipleecgfeaturesdoesnotimprovepredictionofdefibrillationoutcomecomparedtosinglefeaturesinalargepopulationofoutofhospitalcardiacarrests
AT latiniroberto combiningmultipleecgfeaturesdoesnotimprovepredictionofdefibrillationoutcomecomparedtosinglefeaturesinalargepopulationofoutofhospitalcardiacarrests
AT pesentiantonio combiningmultipleecgfeaturesdoesnotimprovepredictionofdefibrillationoutcomecomparedtosinglefeaturesinalargepopulationofoutofhospitalcardiacarrests
AT ristagnogiuseppe combiningmultipleecgfeaturesdoesnotimprovepredictionofdefibrillationoutcomecomparedtosinglefeaturesinalargepopulationofoutofhospitalcardiacarrests