Cargando…
A method for reproducible measurements of serum BDNF: comparison of the performance of six commercial assays
Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor (BDNF) has attracted increasing interest as potential biomarker to support the diagnosis or monitor the efficacy of therapies in brain disorders. Circulating BDNF can be measured in serum, plasma or whole blood. However, the use of BDNF as biomarker is limited by th...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4675070/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26656852 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep17989 |
_version_ | 1782405006835580928 |
---|---|
author | Polacchini, Alessio Metelli, Giuliana Francavilla, Ruggiero Baj, Gabriele Florean, Marina Mascaretti, Luca Giovanni Tongiorgi, Enrico |
author_facet | Polacchini, Alessio Metelli, Giuliana Francavilla, Ruggiero Baj, Gabriele Florean, Marina Mascaretti, Luca Giovanni Tongiorgi, Enrico |
author_sort | Polacchini, Alessio |
collection | PubMed |
description | Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor (BDNF) has attracted increasing interest as potential biomarker to support the diagnosis or monitor the efficacy of therapies in brain disorders. Circulating BDNF can be measured in serum, plasma or whole blood. However, the use of BDNF as biomarker is limited by the poor reproducibility of results, likely due to the variety of methods used for sample collection and BDNF analysis. To overcome these limitations, using sera from 40 healthy adults, we compared the performance of five ELISA kits (Aviscera-Bioscience, Biosensis, Millipore-ChemiKine(TM), Promega-Emax(®), R&D-System-Quantikine(®)) and one multiplexing assay (Millipore-Milliplex(®)). All kits showed 100% sample recovery and comparable range. However, they exhibited very different inter-assay variations from 5% to 20%. Inter-assay variations were higher than those declared by the manufacturers with only one exception which also had the best overall performance. Dot-blot analysis revealed that two kits selectively recognize mature BDNF, while the others reacted with both pro-BDNF and mature BDNF. In conclusion, we identified two assays to obtain reliable measurements of human serum BDNF, suitable for future clinical applications. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4675070 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46750702015-12-16 A method for reproducible measurements of serum BDNF: comparison of the performance of six commercial assays Polacchini, Alessio Metelli, Giuliana Francavilla, Ruggiero Baj, Gabriele Florean, Marina Mascaretti, Luca Giovanni Tongiorgi, Enrico Sci Rep Article Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor (BDNF) has attracted increasing interest as potential biomarker to support the diagnosis or monitor the efficacy of therapies in brain disorders. Circulating BDNF can be measured in serum, plasma or whole blood. However, the use of BDNF as biomarker is limited by the poor reproducibility of results, likely due to the variety of methods used for sample collection and BDNF analysis. To overcome these limitations, using sera from 40 healthy adults, we compared the performance of five ELISA kits (Aviscera-Bioscience, Biosensis, Millipore-ChemiKine(TM), Promega-Emax(®), R&D-System-Quantikine(®)) and one multiplexing assay (Millipore-Milliplex(®)). All kits showed 100% sample recovery and comparable range. However, they exhibited very different inter-assay variations from 5% to 20%. Inter-assay variations were higher than those declared by the manufacturers with only one exception which also had the best overall performance. Dot-blot analysis revealed that two kits selectively recognize mature BDNF, while the others reacted with both pro-BDNF and mature BDNF. In conclusion, we identified two assays to obtain reliable measurements of human serum BDNF, suitable for future clinical applications. Nature Publishing Group 2015-12-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4675070/ /pubmed/26656852 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep17989 Text en Copyright © 2015, Macmillan Publishers Limited http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Article Polacchini, Alessio Metelli, Giuliana Francavilla, Ruggiero Baj, Gabriele Florean, Marina Mascaretti, Luca Giovanni Tongiorgi, Enrico A method for reproducible measurements of serum BDNF: comparison of the performance of six commercial assays |
title | A method for reproducible measurements of serum BDNF: comparison of the performance of six commercial assays |
title_full | A method for reproducible measurements of serum BDNF: comparison of the performance of six commercial assays |
title_fullStr | A method for reproducible measurements of serum BDNF: comparison of the performance of six commercial assays |
title_full_unstemmed | A method for reproducible measurements of serum BDNF: comparison of the performance of six commercial assays |
title_short | A method for reproducible measurements of serum BDNF: comparison of the performance of six commercial assays |
title_sort | method for reproducible measurements of serum bdnf: comparison of the performance of six commercial assays |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4675070/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26656852 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep17989 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT polacchinialessio amethodforreproduciblemeasurementsofserumbdnfcomparisonoftheperformanceofsixcommercialassays AT metelligiuliana amethodforreproduciblemeasurementsofserumbdnfcomparisonoftheperformanceofsixcommercialassays AT francavillaruggiero amethodforreproduciblemeasurementsofserumbdnfcomparisonoftheperformanceofsixcommercialassays AT bajgabriele amethodforreproduciblemeasurementsofserumbdnfcomparisonoftheperformanceofsixcommercialassays AT floreanmarina amethodforreproduciblemeasurementsofserumbdnfcomparisonoftheperformanceofsixcommercialassays AT mascarettilucagiovanni amethodforreproduciblemeasurementsofserumbdnfcomparisonoftheperformanceofsixcommercialassays AT tongiorgienrico amethodforreproduciblemeasurementsofserumbdnfcomparisonoftheperformanceofsixcommercialassays AT polacchinialessio methodforreproduciblemeasurementsofserumbdnfcomparisonoftheperformanceofsixcommercialassays AT metelligiuliana methodforreproduciblemeasurementsofserumbdnfcomparisonoftheperformanceofsixcommercialassays AT francavillaruggiero methodforreproduciblemeasurementsofserumbdnfcomparisonoftheperformanceofsixcommercialassays AT bajgabriele methodforreproduciblemeasurementsofserumbdnfcomparisonoftheperformanceofsixcommercialassays AT floreanmarina methodforreproduciblemeasurementsofserumbdnfcomparisonoftheperformanceofsixcommercialassays AT mascarettilucagiovanni methodforreproduciblemeasurementsofserumbdnfcomparisonoftheperformanceofsixcommercialassays AT tongiorgienrico methodforreproduciblemeasurementsofserumbdnfcomparisonoftheperformanceofsixcommercialassays |