Cargando…

A method for reproducible measurements of serum BDNF: comparison of the performance of six commercial assays

Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor (BDNF) has attracted increasing interest as potential biomarker to support the diagnosis or monitor the efficacy of therapies in brain disorders. Circulating BDNF can be measured in serum, plasma or whole blood. However, the use of BDNF as biomarker is limited by th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Polacchini, Alessio, Metelli, Giuliana, Francavilla, Ruggiero, Baj, Gabriele, Florean, Marina, Mascaretti, Luca Giovanni, Tongiorgi, Enrico
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4675070/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26656852
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep17989
_version_ 1782405006835580928
author Polacchini, Alessio
Metelli, Giuliana
Francavilla, Ruggiero
Baj, Gabriele
Florean, Marina
Mascaretti, Luca Giovanni
Tongiorgi, Enrico
author_facet Polacchini, Alessio
Metelli, Giuliana
Francavilla, Ruggiero
Baj, Gabriele
Florean, Marina
Mascaretti, Luca Giovanni
Tongiorgi, Enrico
author_sort Polacchini, Alessio
collection PubMed
description Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor (BDNF) has attracted increasing interest as potential biomarker to support the diagnosis or monitor the efficacy of therapies in brain disorders. Circulating BDNF can be measured in serum, plasma or whole blood. However, the use of BDNF as biomarker is limited by the poor reproducibility of results, likely due to the variety of methods used for sample collection and BDNF analysis. To overcome these limitations, using sera from 40 healthy adults, we compared the performance of five ELISA kits (Aviscera-Bioscience, Biosensis, Millipore-ChemiKine(TM), Promega-Emax(®), R&D-System-Quantikine(®)) and one multiplexing assay (Millipore-Milliplex(®)). All kits showed 100% sample recovery and comparable range. However, they exhibited very different inter-assay variations from 5% to 20%. Inter-assay variations were higher than those declared by the manufacturers with only one exception which also had the best overall performance. Dot-blot analysis revealed that two kits selectively recognize mature BDNF, while the others reacted with both pro-BDNF and mature BDNF. In conclusion, we identified two assays to obtain reliable measurements of human serum BDNF, suitable for future clinical applications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4675070
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46750702015-12-16 A method for reproducible measurements of serum BDNF: comparison of the performance of six commercial assays Polacchini, Alessio Metelli, Giuliana Francavilla, Ruggiero Baj, Gabriele Florean, Marina Mascaretti, Luca Giovanni Tongiorgi, Enrico Sci Rep Article Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor (BDNF) has attracted increasing interest as potential biomarker to support the diagnosis or monitor the efficacy of therapies in brain disorders. Circulating BDNF can be measured in serum, plasma or whole blood. However, the use of BDNF as biomarker is limited by the poor reproducibility of results, likely due to the variety of methods used for sample collection and BDNF analysis. To overcome these limitations, using sera from 40 healthy adults, we compared the performance of five ELISA kits (Aviscera-Bioscience, Biosensis, Millipore-ChemiKine(TM), Promega-Emax(®), R&D-System-Quantikine(®)) and one multiplexing assay (Millipore-Milliplex(®)). All kits showed 100% sample recovery and comparable range. However, they exhibited very different inter-assay variations from 5% to 20%. Inter-assay variations were higher than those declared by the manufacturers with only one exception which also had the best overall performance. Dot-blot analysis revealed that two kits selectively recognize mature BDNF, while the others reacted with both pro-BDNF and mature BDNF. In conclusion, we identified two assays to obtain reliable measurements of human serum BDNF, suitable for future clinical applications. Nature Publishing Group 2015-12-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4675070/ /pubmed/26656852 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep17989 Text en Copyright © 2015, Macmillan Publishers Limited http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Article
Polacchini, Alessio
Metelli, Giuliana
Francavilla, Ruggiero
Baj, Gabriele
Florean, Marina
Mascaretti, Luca Giovanni
Tongiorgi, Enrico
A method for reproducible measurements of serum BDNF: comparison of the performance of six commercial assays
title A method for reproducible measurements of serum BDNF: comparison of the performance of six commercial assays
title_full A method for reproducible measurements of serum BDNF: comparison of the performance of six commercial assays
title_fullStr A method for reproducible measurements of serum BDNF: comparison of the performance of six commercial assays
title_full_unstemmed A method for reproducible measurements of serum BDNF: comparison of the performance of six commercial assays
title_short A method for reproducible measurements of serum BDNF: comparison of the performance of six commercial assays
title_sort method for reproducible measurements of serum bdnf: comparison of the performance of six commercial assays
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4675070/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26656852
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep17989
work_keys_str_mv AT polacchinialessio amethodforreproduciblemeasurementsofserumbdnfcomparisonoftheperformanceofsixcommercialassays
AT metelligiuliana amethodforreproduciblemeasurementsofserumbdnfcomparisonoftheperformanceofsixcommercialassays
AT francavillaruggiero amethodforreproduciblemeasurementsofserumbdnfcomparisonoftheperformanceofsixcommercialassays
AT bajgabriele amethodforreproduciblemeasurementsofserumbdnfcomparisonoftheperformanceofsixcommercialassays
AT floreanmarina amethodforreproduciblemeasurementsofserumbdnfcomparisonoftheperformanceofsixcommercialassays
AT mascarettilucagiovanni amethodforreproduciblemeasurementsofserumbdnfcomparisonoftheperformanceofsixcommercialassays
AT tongiorgienrico amethodforreproduciblemeasurementsofserumbdnfcomparisonoftheperformanceofsixcommercialassays
AT polacchinialessio methodforreproduciblemeasurementsofserumbdnfcomparisonoftheperformanceofsixcommercialassays
AT metelligiuliana methodforreproduciblemeasurementsofserumbdnfcomparisonoftheperformanceofsixcommercialassays
AT francavillaruggiero methodforreproduciblemeasurementsofserumbdnfcomparisonoftheperformanceofsixcommercialassays
AT bajgabriele methodforreproduciblemeasurementsofserumbdnfcomparisonoftheperformanceofsixcommercialassays
AT floreanmarina methodforreproduciblemeasurementsofserumbdnfcomparisonoftheperformanceofsixcommercialassays
AT mascarettilucagiovanni methodforreproduciblemeasurementsofserumbdnfcomparisonoftheperformanceofsixcommercialassays
AT tongiorgienrico methodforreproduciblemeasurementsofserumbdnfcomparisonoftheperformanceofsixcommercialassays