Cargando…

The Impact of Fractional Flow Reserve on Revascularization

INTRODUCTION: Fractional flow reserve (FFR) is recommended by society guidelines for assessment of the hemodynamic significance of intermediate coronary lesions when non-invasive evidence of myocardial ischemia is unavailable. However, the prevalence of FFR usage in current practice and how FFR valu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Elgendy, Islam Y., Choi, Calvin, Bavry, Anthony A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Healthcare 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4675752/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26424728
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40119-015-0051-1
_version_ 1782405053217243136
author Elgendy, Islam Y.
Choi, Calvin
Bavry, Anthony A.
author_facet Elgendy, Islam Y.
Choi, Calvin
Bavry, Anthony A.
author_sort Elgendy, Islam Y.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Fractional flow reserve (FFR) is recommended by society guidelines for assessment of the hemodynamic significance of intermediate coronary lesions when non-invasive evidence of myocardial ischemia is unavailable. However, the prevalence of FFR usage in current practice and how FFR values impact revascularization decisions are not well known. METHODS: At a single-center Veterans Administration Hospital, all subjects referred for coronary angiography for any indication from the period from May 2012 until January 2014 were prospectively entered into a database. FFR was measured in all intermediate coronary lesions (30–70% stenosis). Based on the FFR results, the lesions were categorized into 3 different groups: FFR > 0.80 (non-ischemic), FFR 0.75–0.80 (gray zone), and FFR < 0.75 (ischemic). RESULTS: A total of 1482 cardiac catheterizations were performed during the study period. FFR was performed in 347 (23%) of these procedures. The total numbers of intermediate coronary lesions evaluated with FFR were 429. The mean FFR value was 0.79 (median = 0.80; interquartile range 0.64–0.96). Among 211 non-ischemic lesions, revascularization was deferred in 201 (95%). In the gray-zone group (73 lesions), 35 (48%) lesions were treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), 11 (15%) lesions were referred for coronary artery bypass grafting surgery (CABG), and 27 (37%) lesions were treated medically. In the ischemic group (145 lesions), 82 (57%) lesions were treated with PCI, 41 (28%) lesions were referred for CABG, and 22 (15%) lesions were treated medically. CONCLUSION: At a Veterans Administration Hospital, FFR was performed in approximately one out of four total catheterizations. FFR documented lack of ischemia in about half of the intermediate coronary lesions, and thus reduced the need for many revascularization procedures. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s40119-015-0051-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4675752
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Springer Healthcare
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46757522015-12-18 The Impact of Fractional Flow Reserve on Revascularization Elgendy, Islam Y. Choi, Calvin Bavry, Anthony A. Cardiol Ther Brief Report INTRODUCTION: Fractional flow reserve (FFR) is recommended by society guidelines for assessment of the hemodynamic significance of intermediate coronary lesions when non-invasive evidence of myocardial ischemia is unavailable. However, the prevalence of FFR usage in current practice and how FFR values impact revascularization decisions are not well known. METHODS: At a single-center Veterans Administration Hospital, all subjects referred for coronary angiography for any indication from the period from May 2012 until January 2014 were prospectively entered into a database. FFR was measured in all intermediate coronary lesions (30–70% stenosis). Based on the FFR results, the lesions were categorized into 3 different groups: FFR > 0.80 (non-ischemic), FFR 0.75–0.80 (gray zone), and FFR < 0.75 (ischemic). RESULTS: A total of 1482 cardiac catheterizations were performed during the study period. FFR was performed in 347 (23%) of these procedures. The total numbers of intermediate coronary lesions evaluated with FFR were 429. The mean FFR value was 0.79 (median = 0.80; interquartile range 0.64–0.96). Among 211 non-ischemic lesions, revascularization was deferred in 201 (95%). In the gray-zone group (73 lesions), 35 (48%) lesions were treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), 11 (15%) lesions were referred for coronary artery bypass grafting surgery (CABG), and 27 (37%) lesions were treated medically. In the ischemic group (145 lesions), 82 (57%) lesions were treated with PCI, 41 (28%) lesions were referred for CABG, and 22 (15%) lesions were treated medically. CONCLUSION: At a Veterans Administration Hospital, FFR was performed in approximately one out of four total catheterizations. FFR documented lack of ischemia in about half of the intermediate coronary lesions, and thus reduced the need for many revascularization procedures. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s40119-015-0051-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Healthcare 2015-09-30 2015-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4675752/ /pubmed/26424728 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40119-015-0051-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2015 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Brief Report
Elgendy, Islam Y.
Choi, Calvin
Bavry, Anthony A.
The Impact of Fractional Flow Reserve on Revascularization
title The Impact of Fractional Flow Reserve on Revascularization
title_full The Impact of Fractional Flow Reserve on Revascularization
title_fullStr The Impact of Fractional Flow Reserve on Revascularization
title_full_unstemmed The Impact of Fractional Flow Reserve on Revascularization
title_short The Impact of Fractional Flow Reserve on Revascularization
title_sort impact of fractional flow reserve on revascularization
topic Brief Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4675752/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26424728
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40119-015-0051-1
work_keys_str_mv AT elgendyislamy theimpactoffractionalflowreserveonrevascularization
AT choicalvin theimpactoffractionalflowreserveonrevascularization
AT bavryanthonya theimpactoffractionalflowreserveonrevascularization
AT elgendyislamy impactoffractionalflowreserveonrevascularization
AT choicalvin impactoffractionalflowreserveonrevascularization
AT bavryanthonya impactoffractionalflowreserveonrevascularization