Cargando…

Female genital mutilation and cutting: a systematic literature review of health professionals’ knowledge, attitudes and clinical practice

BACKGROUND: The World Health Organisation (WHO) estimates that 100–140 million girls and women have undergone female genital mutilation or cutting (FGM/C). FGM/C is an ancient cultural practice prevalent in 26 countries in Africa, the Middle East and Asia. With increased immigration, health professi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zurynski, Yvonne, Sureshkumar, Premala, Phu, Amy, Elliott, Elizabeth
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4676087/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26652275
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12914-015-0070-y
_version_ 1782405107762069504
author Zurynski, Yvonne
Sureshkumar, Premala
Phu, Amy
Elliott, Elizabeth
author_facet Zurynski, Yvonne
Sureshkumar, Premala
Phu, Amy
Elliott, Elizabeth
author_sort Zurynski, Yvonne
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The World Health Organisation (WHO) estimates that 100–140 million girls and women have undergone female genital mutilation or cutting (FGM/C). FGM/C is an ancient cultural practice prevalent in 26 countries in Africa, the Middle East and Asia. With increased immigration, health professionals in high income countries including UK, Europe, North America and Australia care for women and girls with FGM/C. FGM/C is relevant to paediatric practice as it is usually performed in children, however, health professionals’ knowledge, clinical practice, and attitudes to FGM/C have not been systematically described. We aimed to conduct a systematic review of the literature to address this gap. METHODS: The review was conducted according to guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement and registered with the PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42015015540, http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/). Articles published in English 2000–2014 which used quantitative methods were reviewed. RESULTS: Of 159 unique articles, 18 met inclusion criteria. The methodological quality was poor - six studies met seven of the eight quality criteria. Study participants included mainly obstetricians, gynaecologists and midwives (15 studies). We found no papers that studied paediatricians specifically, but two papers reported on subgroups of paediatricians within a mixed sample of health professionals. The 18 articles covered 13 different countries: eight from Africa and 10 from high income countries. Most health professionals were aware of the practice of FGM/C, but few correctly identified the four FGM/C categories defined by WHO. Knowledge about FGM/C legislation varied: 25 % of professionals in a Sudanese study, 46 % of Belgian labour ward staff and 94 % of health professionals from the UK knew that FGM/C was illegal in their country. Health professionals from high income countries had cared for women or girls with FGM/C. The need to report children with FGM/C, or at risk of FGM/C, to child protection authorities was mentioned by only two studies. CONCLUSION: Further research is needed to determine health professionals’ attitudes, knowledge and practice to support the development of educational materials and policy to raise awareness and to prevent this harmful practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4676087
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46760872015-12-12 Female genital mutilation and cutting: a systematic literature review of health professionals’ knowledge, attitudes and clinical practice Zurynski, Yvonne Sureshkumar, Premala Phu, Amy Elliott, Elizabeth BMC Int Health Hum Rights Research Article BACKGROUND: The World Health Organisation (WHO) estimates that 100–140 million girls and women have undergone female genital mutilation or cutting (FGM/C). FGM/C is an ancient cultural practice prevalent in 26 countries in Africa, the Middle East and Asia. With increased immigration, health professionals in high income countries including UK, Europe, North America and Australia care for women and girls with FGM/C. FGM/C is relevant to paediatric practice as it is usually performed in children, however, health professionals’ knowledge, clinical practice, and attitudes to FGM/C have not been systematically described. We aimed to conduct a systematic review of the literature to address this gap. METHODS: The review was conducted according to guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement and registered with the PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42015015540, http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/). Articles published in English 2000–2014 which used quantitative methods were reviewed. RESULTS: Of 159 unique articles, 18 met inclusion criteria. The methodological quality was poor - six studies met seven of the eight quality criteria. Study participants included mainly obstetricians, gynaecologists and midwives (15 studies). We found no papers that studied paediatricians specifically, but two papers reported on subgroups of paediatricians within a mixed sample of health professionals. The 18 articles covered 13 different countries: eight from Africa and 10 from high income countries. Most health professionals were aware of the practice of FGM/C, but few correctly identified the four FGM/C categories defined by WHO. Knowledge about FGM/C legislation varied: 25 % of professionals in a Sudanese study, 46 % of Belgian labour ward staff and 94 % of health professionals from the UK knew that FGM/C was illegal in their country. Health professionals from high income countries had cared for women or girls with FGM/C. The need to report children with FGM/C, or at risk of FGM/C, to child protection authorities was mentioned by only two studies. CONCLUSION: Further research is needed to determine health professionals’ attitudes, knowledge and practice to support the development of educational materials and policy to raise awareness and to prevent this harmful practice. BioMed Central 2015-12-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4676087/ /pubmed/26652275 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12914-015-0070-y Text en © Zurynski et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Zurynski, Yvonne
Sureshkumar, Premala
Phu, Amy
Elliott, Elizabeth
Female genital mutilation and cutting: a systematic literature review of health professionals’ knowledge, attitudes and clinical practice
title Female genital mutilation and cutting: a systematic literature review of health professionals’ knowledge, attitudes and clinical practice
title_full Female genital mutilation and cutting: a systematic literature review of health professionals’ knowledge, attitudes and clinical practice
title_fullStr Female genital mutilation and cutting: a systematic literature review of health professionals’ knowledge, attitudes and clinical practice
title_full_unstemmed Female genital mutilation and cutting: a systematic literature review of health professionals’ knowledge, attitudes and clinical practice
title_short Female genital mutilation and cutting: a systematic literature review of health professionals’ knowledge, attitudes and clinical practice
title_sort female genital mutilation and cutting: a systematic literature review of health professionals’ knowledge, attitudes and clinical practice
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4676087/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26652275
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12914-015-0070-y
work_keys_str_mv AT zurynskiyvonne femalegenitalmutilationandcuttingasystematicliteraturereviewofhealthprofessionalsknowledgeattitudesandclinicalpractice
AT sureshkumarpremala femalegenitalmutilationandcuttingasystematicliteraturereviewofhealthprofessionalsknowledgeattitudesandclinicalpractice
AT phuamy femalegenitalmutilationandcuttingasystematicliteraturereviewofhealthprofessionalsknowledgeattitudesandclinicalpractice
AT elliottelizabeth femalegenitalmutilationandcuttingasystematicliteraturereviewofhealthprofessionalsknowledgeattitudesandclinicalpractice