Cargando…

AVERT(2) (a very early rehabilitation trial, a very effective reproductive trigger): retrospective observational analysis of the number of babies born to trial staff

Objective To report the number of participants needed to recruit per baby born to trial staff during AVERT, a large international trial on acute stroke, and to describe trial management consequences. Design Retrospective observational analysis. Setting 56 acute stroke hospitals in eight countries. P...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bernhardt, Julie, Lindley, Richard I, Lalor, Erin, Ellery, Fiona, Chamberlain, Jan, Van Holsteyn, John, Collier, Janice M, Dewey, Helen M, Parsons, Brooke, Moodie, Marjory, Lennon, Sheila, Donnan, Geoffrey A, Thrift, Amanda G, Churilov, Leonid, Langhorne, Peter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4676118/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26658193
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h6432
_version_ 1782405114968932352
author Bernhardt, Julie
Lindley, Richard I
Lalor, Erin
Ellery, Fiona
Chamberlain, Jan
Van Holsteyn, John
Collier, Janice M
Dewey, Helen M
Parsons, Brooke
Moodie, Marjory
Lennon, Sheila
Donnan, Geoffrey A
Thrift, Amanda G
Churilov, Leonid
Langhorne, Peter
author_facet Bernhardt, Julie
Lindley, Richard I
Lalor, Erin
Ellery, Fiona
Chamberlain, Jan
Van Holsteyn, John
Collier, Janice M
Dewey, Helen M
Parsons, Brooke
Moodie, Marjory
Lennon, Sheila
Donnan, Geoffrey A
Thrift, Amanda G
Churilov, Leonid
Langhorne, Peter
author_sort Bernhardt, Julie
collection PubMed
description Objective To report the number of participants needed to recruit per baby born to trial staff during AVERT, a large international trial on acute stroke, and to describe trial management consequences. Design Retrospective observational analysis. Setting 56 acute stroke hospitals in eight countries. Participants 1074 trial physiotherapists, nurses, and other clinicians. Outcome measures Number of babies born during trial recruitment per trial participant recruited. Results With 198 site recruitment years and 2104 patients recruited during AVERT, 120 babies were born to trial staff. Births led to an estimated 10% loss in time to achieve recruitment. Parental leave was linked to six trial site closures. The number of participants needed to recruit per baby born was 17.5 (95% confidence interval 14.7 to 21.0); additional trial costs associated with each birth were estimated at 5736 Australian dollars on average. Conclusion The staff absences registered in AVERT owing to parental leave led to delayed trial recruitment and increased costs, and should be considered by trial investigators when planning research and estimating budgets. However, the celebration of new life became a highlight of the annual AVERT collaborators’ meetings and helped maintain a cohesive collaborative group. Trial registration Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry no 12606000185561. Disclaimer Participation in a rehabilitation trial does not guarantee successful reproductive activity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4676118
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46761182015-12-18 AVERT(2) (a very early rehabilitation trial, a very effective reproductive trigger): retrospective observational analysis of the number of babies born to trial staff Bernhardt, Julie Lindley, Richard I Lalor, Erin Ellery, Fiona Chamberlain, Jan Van Holsteyn, John Collier, Janice M Dewey, Helen M Parsons, Brooke Moodie, Marjory Lennon, Sheila Donnan, Geoffrey A Thrift, Amanda G Churilov, Leonid Langhorne, Peter BMJ Research Objective To report the number of participants needed to recruit per baby born to trial staff during AVERT, a large international trial on acute stroke, and to describe trial management consequences. Design Retrospective observational analysis. Setting 56 acute stroke hospitals in eight countries. Participants 1074 trial physiotherapists, nurses, and other clinicians. Outcome measures Number of babies born during trial recruitment per trial participant recruited. Results With 198 site recruitment years and 2104 patients recruited during AVERT, 120 babies were born to trial staff. Births led to an estimated 10% loss in time to achieve recruitment. Parental leave was linked to six trial site closures. The number of participants needed to recruit per baby born was 17.5 (95% confidence interval 14.7 to 21.0); additional trial costs associated with each birth were estimated at 5736 Australian dollars on average. Conclusion The staff absences registered in AVERT owing to parental leave led to delayed trial recruitment and increased costs, and should be considered by trial investigators when planning research and estimating budgets. However, the celebration of new life became a highlight of the annual AVERT collaborators’ meetings and helped maintain a cohesive collaborative group. Trial registration Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry no 12606000185561. Disclaimer Participation in a rehabilitation trial does not guarantee successful reproductive activity. BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2015-12-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4676118/ /pubmed/26658193 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h6432 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 3.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/.
spellingShingle Research
Bernhardt, Julie
Lindley, Richard I
Lalor, Erin
Ellery, Fiona
Chamberlain, Jan
Van Holsteyn, John
Collier, Janice M
Dewey, Helen M
Parsons, Brooke
Moodie, Marjory
Lennon, Sheila
Donnan, Geoffrey A
Thrift, Amanda G
Churilov, Leonid
Langhorne, Peter
AVERT(2) (a very early rehabilitation trial, a very effective reproductive trigger): retrospective observational analysis of the number of babies born to trial staff
title AVERT(2) (a very early rehabilitation trial, a very effective reproductive trigger): retrospective observational analysis of the number of babies born to trial staff
title_full AVERT(2) (a very early rehabilitation trial, a very effective reproductive trigger): retrospective observational analysis of the number of babies born to trial staff
title_fullStr AVERT(2) (a very early rehabilitation trial, a very effective reproductive trigger): retrospective observational analysis of the number of babies born to trial staff
title_full_unstemmed AVERT(2) (a very early rehabilitation trial, a very effective reproductive trigger): retrospective observational analysis of the number of babies born to trial staff
title_short AVERT(2) (a very early rehabilitation trial, a very effective reproductive trigger): retrospective observational analysis of the number of babies born to trial staff
title_sort avert(2) (a very early rehabilitation trial, a very effective reproductive trigger): retrospective observational analysis of the number of babies born to trial staff
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4676118/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26658193
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h6432
work_keys_str_mv AT bernhardtjulie avert2averyearlyrehabilitationtrialaveryeffectivereproductivetriggerretrospectiveobservationalanalysisofthenumberofbabiesborntotrialstaff
AT lindleyrichardi avert2averyearlyrehabilitationtrialaveryeffectivereproductivetriggerretrospectiveobservationalanalysisofthenumberofbabiesborntotrialstaff
AT lalorerin avert2averyearlyrehabilitationtrialaveryeffectivereproductivetriggerretrospectiveobservationalanalysisofthenumberofbabiesborntotrialstaff
AT elleryfiona avert2averyearlyrehabilitationtrialaveryeffectivereproductivetriggerretrospectiveobservationalanalysisofthenumberofbabiesborntotrialstaff
AT chamberlainjan avert2averyearlyrehabilitationtrialaveryeffectivereproductivetriggerretrospectiveobservationalanalysisofthenumberofbabiesborntotrialstaff
AT vanholsteynjohn avert2averyearlyrehabilitationtrialaveryeffectivereproductivetriggerretrospectiveobservationalanalysisofthenumberofbabiesborntotrialstaff
AT collierjanicem avert2averyearlyrehabilitationtrialaveryeffectivereproductivetriggerretrospectiveobservationalanalysisofthenumberofbabiesborntotrialstaff
AT deweyhelenm avert2averyearlyrehabilitationtrialaveryeffectivereproductivetriggerretrospectiveobservationalanalysisofthenumberofbabiesborntotrialstaff
AT parsonsbrooke avert2averyearlyrehabilitationtrialaveryeffectivereproductivetriggerretrospectiveobservationalanalysisofthenumberofbabiesborntotrialstaff
AT moodiemarjory avert2averyearlyrehabilitationtrialaveryeffectivereproductivetriggerretrospectiveobservationalanalysisofthenumberofbabiesborntotrialstaff
AT lennonsheila avert2averyearlyrehabilitationtrialaveryeffectivereproductivetriggerretrospectiveobservationalanalysisofthenumberofbabiesborntotrialstaff
AT donnangeoffreya avert2averyearlyrehabilitationtrialaveryeffectivereproductivetriggerretrospectiveobservationalanalysisofthenumberofbabiesborntotrialstaff
AT thriftamandag avert2averyearlyrehabilitationtrialaveryeffectivereproductivetriggerretrospectiveobservationalanalysisofthenumberofbabiesborntotrialstaff
AT churilovleonid avert2averyearlyrehabilitationtrialaveryeffectivereproductivetriggerretrospectiveobservationalanalysisofthenumberofbabiesborntotrialstaff
AT langhornepeter avert2averyearlyrehabilitationtrialaveryeffectivereproductivetriggerretrospectiveobservationalanalysisofthenumberofbabiesborntotrialstaff