Cargando…

A majority of rural emergency departments in the province of Quebec use point-of-care ultrasound: a cross-sectional survey

BACKGROUND: Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) can be used to provide rapid answers to specific and potentially life-threatening clinical questions, and to improve the safety of procedures. The rate of POCUS access and use in Canada is unclear. The objective of this study was to examine access to POCU...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Léger, Pierre, Fleet, Richard, Giguère, Julie Maltais-, Plant, Jeff, Piette, Éric, Légaré, France, Poitras, Julien
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4676152/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26655376
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12873-015-0063-0
_version_ 1782405122803892224
author Léger, Pierre
Fleet, Richard
Giguère, Julie Maltais-
Plant, Jeff
Piette, Éric
Légaré, France
Poitras, Julien
author_facet Léger, Pierre
Fleet, Richard
Giguère, Julie Maltais-
Plant, Jeff
Piette, Éric
Légaré, France
Poitras, Julien
author_sort Léger, Pierre
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) can be used to provide rapid answers to specific and potentially life-threatening clinical questions, and to improve the safety of procedures. The rate of POCUS access and use in Canada is unclear. The objective of this study was to examine access to POCUS and potential barriers/facilitators to its use among rural physicians in Quebec. METHODS: This descriptive cross-sectional study used an online survey. The 30-item questionnaire is an adapted and translated version of a questionnaire used in a prior survey conducted in rural Ontario, Canada. The questionnaire was pre-tested for clarity and relevance. The survey was sent to non-locum physicians working either full- or part-time in rural emergency departments (EDs) (n = 206). All EDs were located in rural and small towns and provided 24/7 medical coverage with acute care hospitalization beds. RESULTS: In total, 108 surveys were completed (participation rate = 52.4 %). Of the individuals who completed surveys, ninety-three percent were family physicians, and seven percent had Canadian College of Family Physicians – Emergency Medicine (CCFP-EM) certification. The median number of years of practice was seven. A bedside ultrasound device was available in 95 % of rural EDs; 75.9 % of physicians reported using POCUS on a regular basis. The most common indications for POCUS use were to rule out abdominal aortic aneurysm (70.4 %) and to evaluate presence of free fluid in trauma and intrauterine pregnancy (60 %). The most common reason (73 %) for not using POCUS was limited access to POCUS training programs. Over 40 % of POCUS users received training in POCUS during medical school or residency. Sixty-four percent received training from the Canadian Emergency Ultrasound Society, 13 % received training from the Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians, and 23 % were trained in another course. Finally, 95 % of respondents reported that POCUS skills are essential for rural ED practice. CONCLUSIONS: POCUS use in rural EDs in the province of Quebec appears to be relatively widespread. Access to training programs is a barrier to greater use.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4676152
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46761522015-12-12 A majority of rural emergency departments in the province of Quebec use point-of-care ultrasound: a cross-sectional survey Léger, Pierre Fleet, Richard Giguère, Julie Maltais- Plant, Jeff Piette, Éric Légaré, France Poitras, Julien BMC Emerg Med Research Article BACKGROUND: Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) can be used to provide rapid answers to specific and potentially life-threatening clinical questions, and to improve the safety of procedures. The rate of POCUS access and use in Canada is unclear. The objective of this study was to examine access to POCUS and potential barriers/facilitators to its use among rural physicians in Quebec. METHODS: This descriptive cross-sectional study used an online survey. The 30-item questionnaire is an adapted and translated version of a questionnaire used in a prior survey conducted in rural Ontario, Canada. The questionnaire was pre-tested for clarity and relevance. The survey was sent to non-locum physicians working either full- or part-time in rural emergency departments (EDs) (n = 206). All EDs were located in rural and small towns and provided 24/7 medical coverage with acute care hospitalization beds. RESULTS: In total, 108 surveys were completed (participation rate = 52.4 %). Of the individuals who completed surveys, ninety-three percent were family physicians, and seven percent had Canadian College of Family Physicians – Emergency Medicine (CCFP-EM) certification. The median number of years of practice was seven. A bedside ultrasound device was available in 95 % of rural EDs; 75.9 % of physicians reported using POCUS on a regular basis. The most common indications for POCUS use were to rule out abdominal aortic aneurysm (70.4 %) and to evaluate presence of free fluid in trauma and intrauterine pregnancy (60 %). The most common reason (73 %) for not using POCUS was limited access to POCUS training programs. Over 40 % of POCUS users received training in POCUS during medical school or residency. Sixty-four percent received training from the Canadian Emergency Ultrasound Society, 13 % received training from the Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians, and 23 % were trained in another course. Finally, 95 % of respondents reported that POCUS skills are essential for rural ED practice. CONCLUSIONS: POCUS use in rural EDs in the province of Quebec appears to be relatively widespread. Access to training programs is a barrier to greater use. BioMed Central 2015-12-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4676152/ /pubmed/26655376 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12873-015-0063-0 Text en © Léger et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Léger, Pierre
Fleet, Richard
Giguère, Julie Maltais-
Plant, Jeff
Piette, Éric
Légaré, France
Poitras, Julien
A majority of rural emergency departments in the province of Quebec use point-of-care ultrasound: a cross-sectional survey
title A majority of rural emergency departments in the province of Quebec use point-of-care ultrasound: a cross-sectional survey
title_full A majority of rural emergency departments in the province of Quebec use point-of-care ultrasound: a cross-sectional survey
title_fullStr A majority of rural emergency departments in the province of Quebec use point-of-care ultrasound: a cross-sectional survey
title_full_unstemmed A majority of rural emergency departments in the province of Quebec use point-of-care ultrasound: a cross-sectional survey
title_short A majority of rural emergency departments in the province of Quebec use point-of-care ultrasound: a cross-sectional survey
title_sort majority of rural emergency departments in the province of quebec use point-of-care ultrasound: a cross-sectional survey
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4676152/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26655376
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12873-015-0063-0
work_keys_str_mv AT legerpierre amajorityofruralemergencydepartmentsintheprovinceofquebecusepointofcareultrasoundacrosssectionalsurvey
AT fleetrichard amajorityofruralemergencydepartmentsintheprovinceofquebecusepointofcareultrasoundacrosssectionalsurvey
AT giguerejuliemaltais amajorityofruralemergencydepartmentsintheprovinceofquebecusepointofcareultrasoundacrosssectionalsurvey
AT plantjeff amajorityofruralemergencydepartmentsintheprovinceofquebecusepointofcareultrasoundacrosssectionalsurvey
AT pietteeric amajorityofruralemergencydepartmentsintheprovinceofquebecusepointofcareultrasoundacrosssectionalsurvey
AT legarefrance amajorityofruralemergencydepartmentsintheprovinceofquebecusepointofcareultrasoundacrosssectionalsurvey
AT poitrasjulien amajorityofruralemergencydepartmentsintheprovinceofquebecusepointofcareultrasoundacrosssectionalsurvey
AT legerpierre majorityofruralemergencydepartmentsintheprovinceofquebecusepointofcareultrasoundacrosssectionalsurvey
AT fleetrichard majorityofruralemergencydepartmentsintheprovinceofquebecusepointofcareultrasoundacrosssectionalsurvey
AT giguerejuliemaltais majorityofruralemergencydepartmentsintheprovinceofquebecusepointofcareultrasoundacrosssectionalsurvey
AT plantjeff majorityofruralemergencydepartmentsintheprovinceofquebecusepointofcareultrasoundacrosssectionalsurvey
AT pietteeric majorityofruralemergencydepartmentsintheprovinceofquebecusepointofcareultrasoundacrosssectionalsurvey
AT legarefrance majorityofruralemergencydepartmentsintheprovinceofquebecusepointofcareultrasoundacrosssectionalsurvey
AT poitrasjulien majorityofruralemergencydepartmentsintheprovinceofquebecusepointofcareultrasoundacrosssectionalsurvey