Cargando…

Effect of novel patient interaction on students’ performance of pregnancy options counseling

BACKGROUND: Although options counseling is a fundamental skill for medical providers, previous research has identified gaps in medical school reproductive health education. PURPOSE: To determine if a 1-h novel patient interaction (NPI) improves student performance when caring for a standardized pati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shaddeau, Angela, Nimz, Abigail, Sheeder, Jeanelle, Tocce, Kristina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Co-Action Publishing 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4676360/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26654215
http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/meo.v20.29401
_version_ 1782405165722107904
author Shaddeau, Angela
Nimz, Abigail
Sheeder, Jeanelle
Tocce, Kristina
author_facet Shaddeau, Angela
Nimz, Abigail
Sheeder, Jeanelle
Tocce, Kristina
author_sort Shaddeau, Angela
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Although options counseling is a fundamental skill for medical providers, previous research has identified gaps in medical school reproductive health education. PURPOSE: To determine if a 1-h novel patient interaction (NPI) improves student performance when caring for a standardized patient with an unintended pregnancy. METHODS: From September 2012 to June 2013 we randomized third-year medical students at the University of Colorado School of Medicine to the standard curriculum plus an NPI, or the standard curriculum only. The NPI consisted of a 1-h small-group session with a patient who discussed her experiences with options counseling and her decision to terminate her pregnancy. Students completed an Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) at the rotation's end, which included options counseling. The primary outcome was the proportion of participants achieving ‘excellence’ on the OSCE checklist. ‘Excellence’ was defined as a score ≥90%. Examinations were flagged as ‘unsatisfactory encounters’ if core competencies were not addressed. OSCE standardized patients and evaluators were blinded to group assignment. RESULTS: In total, 135 students were eligible and randomized: 75 to NPI; 60 to control. During the OSCE, few students achieved ‘excellence’ (24% NPI vs. 28% control, p=0.57). There were no differences between scores for components of options counseling. More students in the control group ‘appeared somewhat uncomfortable’ delivering the pregnancy test results (5% NPI vs. 18% control, p=0.006). More than half (54%) of the intervention group and 67% of controls had ‘unsatisfactory encounters’ (p=0.16), almost exclusively due to omission of adoption. Most students addressed abortion (96% NPI vs. 92% control, p=0.29). CONCLUSIONS: A 1-h NPI does not improve medical students’ performance of pregnancy options counseling and the option of adoption is routinely omitted. Adoption is clearly an area that needs greater attention when designing comprehensive reproductive health curriculum for medical students.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4676360
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Co-Action Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46763602016-01-05 Effect of novel patient interaction on students’ performance of pregnancy options counseling Shaddeau, Angela Nimz, Abigail Sheeder, Jeanelle Tocce, Kristina Med Educ Online Research Article BACKGROUND: Although options counseling is a fundamental skill for medical providers, previous research has identified gaps in medical school reproductive health education. PURPOSE: To determine if a 1-h novel patient interaction (NPI) improves student performance when caring for a standardized patient with an unintended pregnancy. METHODS: From September 2012 to June 2013 we randomized third-year medical students at the University of Colorado School of Medicine to the standard curriculum plus an NPI, or the standard curriculum only. The NPI consisted of a 1-h small-group session with a patient who discussed her experiences with options counseling and her decision to terminate her pregnancy. Students completed an Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) at the rotation's end, which included options counseling. The primary outcome was the proportion of participants achieving ‘excellence’ on the OSCE checklist. ‘Excellence’ was defined as a score ≥90%. Examinations were flagged as ‘unsatisfactory encounters’ if core competencies were not addressed. OSCE standardized patients and evaluators were blinded to group assignment. RESULTS: In total, 135 students were eligible and randomized: 75 to NPI; 60 to control. During the OSCE, few students achieved ‘excellence’ (24% NPI vs. 28% control, p=0.57). There were no differences between scores for components of options counseling. More students in the control group ‘appeared somewhat uncomfortable’ delivering the pregnancy test results (5% NPI vs. 18% control, p=0.006). More than half (54%) of the intervention group and 67% of controls had ‘unsatisfactory encounters’ (p=0.16), almost exclusively due to omission of adoption. Most students addressed abortion (96% NPI vs. 92% control, p=0.29). CONCLUSIONS: A 1-h NPI does not improve medical students’ performance of pregnancy options counseling and the option of adoption is routinely omitted. Adoption is clearly an area that needs greater attention when designing comprehensive reproductive health curriculum for medical students. Co-Action Publishing 2015-12-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4676360/ /pubmed/26654215 http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/meo.v20.29401 Text en © 2015 Angela Shaddeau et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
spellingShingle Research Article
Shaddeau, Angela
Nimz, Abigail
Sheeder, Jeanelle
Tocce, Kristina
Effect of novel patient interaction on students’ performance of pregnancy options counseling
title Effect of novel patient interaction on students’ performance of pregnancy options counseling
title_full Effect of novel patient interaction on students’ performance of pregnancy options counseling
title_fullStr Effect of novel patient interaction on students’ performance of pregnancy options counseling
title_full_unstemmed Effect of novel patient interaction on students’ performance of pregnancy options counseling
title_short Effect of novel patient interaction on students’ performance of pregnancy options counseling
title_sort effect of novel patient interaction on students’ performance of pregnancy options counseling
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4676360/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26654215
http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/meo.v20.29401
work_keys_str_mv AT shaddeauangela effectofnovelpatientinteractiononstudentsperformanceofpregnancyoptionscounseling
AT nimzabigail effectofnovelpatientinteractiononstudentsperformanceofpregnancyoptionscounseling
AT sheederjeanelle effectofnovelpatientinteractiononstudentsperformanceofpregnancyoptionscounseling
AT toccekristina effectofnovelpatientinteractiononstudentsperformanceofpregnancyoptionscounseling