Cargando…

Dobutamine stress echocardiography after cardiac transplantation: implications of donor–recipient age difference

Dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) is widely used during follow-up after cardiac transplant for the diagnosis of allograft vasculopathy. We investigated the effect of donor–recipient age difference on the ability to reach target heart rate (HR) during DSE. All cardiac transplant patients who w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gibson, Patrick H, Riesgo, Fernando, Choy, Jonathan B, Kim, Daniel H, Becher, Harald
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Bioscientifica Ltd 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4676477/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26693335
http://dx.doi.org/10.1530/ERP-15-0006
_version_ 1782405184559775744
author Gibson, Patrick H
Riesgo, Fernando
Choy, Jonathan B
Kim, Daniel H
Becher, Harald
author_facet Gibson, Patrick H
Riesgo, Fernando
Choy, Jonathan B
Kim, Daniel H
Becher, Harald
author_sort Gibson, Patrick H
collection PubMed
description Dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) is widely used during follow-up after cardiac transplant for the diagnosis of allograft vasculopathy. We investigated the effect of donor–recipient age difference on the ability to reach target heart rate (HR) during DSE. All cardiac transplant patients who were undergoing DSE over a 3-year period in a single institution were reviewed. Target HR was specified as 85%×(220 – patient age). Further patient and donor demographics were obtained from the local transplant database. 61 patients (45 male, 55±12 years) were stressed with a median dose of 40 mcg/kg per min dobutamine. Only 37 patients (61%) achieved target HR. Donor hearts were mostly younger (mean 41±14 years, P<0.001), with only 11 patients (18%) having donors who were older than they were. Patients with older donors required higher doses of dobutamine (median 50 vs 30 mcg/kg per min, P<0.001) but achieved a lower percentage target HR (mean 93% vs 101%, P=0.003) than those with younger donors did. Patients with older donors were less likely to achieve target HR (18% vs 67%, P=0.003). In conclusion, donor–recipient age difference affects the likelihood of achieving target HR and should be considered when a patient is consistently unable to achieve ‘adequate’ stress according to the patient's age.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4676477
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Bioscientifica Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46764772015-12-21 Dobutamine stress echocardiography after cardiac transplantation: implications of donor–recipient age difference Gibson, Patrick H Riesgo, Fernando Choy, Jonathan B Kim, Daniel H Becher, Harald Echo Res Pract Research Dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) is widely used during follow-up after cardiac transplant for the diagnosis of allograft vasculopathy. We investigated the effect of donor–recipient age difference on the ability to reach target heart rate (HR) during DSE. All cardiac transplant patients who were undergoing DSE over a 3-year period in a single institution were reviewed. Target HR was specified as 85%×(220 – patient age). Further patient and donor demographics were obtained from the local transplant database. 61 patients (45 male, 55±12 years) were stressed with a median dose of 40 mcg/kg per min dobutamine. Only 37 patients (61%) achieved target HR. Donor hearts were mostly younger (mean 41±14 years, P<0.001), with only 11 patients (18%) having donors who were older than they were. Patients with older donors required higher doses of dobutamine (median 50 vs 30 mcg/kg per min, P<0.001) but achieved a lower percentage target HR (mean 93% vs 101%, P=0.003) than those with younger donors did. Patients with older donors were less likely to achieve target HR (18% vs 67%, P=0.003). In conclusion, donor–recipient age difference affects the likelihood of achieving target HR and should be considered when a patient is consistently unable to achieve ‘adequate’ stress according to the patient's age. Bioscientifica Ltd 2015-05-11 2015-06-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4676477/ /pubmed/26693335 http://dx.doi.org/10.1530/ERP-15-0006 Text en © 2015 The authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Research
Gibson, Patrick H
Riesgo, Fernando
Choy, Jonathan B
Kim, Daniel H
Becher, Harald
Dobutamine stress echocardiography after cardiac transplantation: implications of donor–recipient age difference
title Dobutamine stress echocardiography after cardiac transplantation: implications of donor–recipient age difference
title_full Dobutamine stress echocardiography after cardiac transplantation: implications of donor–recipient age difference
title_fullStr Dobutamine stress echocardiography after cardiac transplantation: implications of donor–recipient age difference
title_full_unstemmed Dobutamine stress echocardiography after cardiac transplantation: implications of donor–recipient age difference
title_short Dobutamine stress echocardiography after cardiac transplantation: implications of donor–recipient age difference
title_sort dobutamine stress echocardiography after cardiac transplantation: implications of donor–recipient age difference
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4676477/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26693335
http://dx.doi.org/10.1530/ERP-15-0006
work_keys_str_mv AT gibsonpatrickh dobutaminestressechocardiographyaftercardiactransplantationimplicationsofdonorrecipientagedifference
AT riesgofernando dobutaminestressechocardiographyaftercardiactransplantationimplicationsofdonorrecipientagedifference
AT choyjonathanb dobutaminestressechocardiographyaftercardiactransplantationimplicationsofdonorrecipientagedifference
AT kimdanielh dobutaminestressechocardiographyaftercardiactransplantationimplicationsofdonorrecipientagedifference
AT becherharald dobutaminestressechocardiographyaftercardiactransplantationimplicationsofdonorrecipientagedifference