Cargando…

Making Activity Recognition Robust against Deceptive Behavior

Healthcare services increasingly use the activity recognition technology to track the daily activities of individuals. In some cases, this is used to provide incentives. For example, some health insurance companies offer discount to customers who are physically active, based on the data collected fr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Saeb, Sohrab, Körding, Konrad, Mohr, David C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4676610/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26659118
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0144795
_version_ 1782405200582017024
author Saeb, Sohrab
Körding, Konrad
Mohr, David C.
author_facet Saeb, Sohrab
Körding, Konrad
Mohr, David C.
author_sort Saeb, Sohrab
collection PubMed
description Healthcare services increasingly use the activity recognition technology to track the daily activities of individuals. In some cases, this is used to provide incentives. For example, some health insurance companies offer discount to customers who are physically active, based on the data collected from their activity tracking devices. Therefore, there is an increasing motivation for individuals to cheat, by making activity trackers detect activities that increase their benefits rather than the ones they actually do. In this study, we used a novel method to make activity recognition robust against deceptive behavior. We asked 14 subjects to attempt to trick our smartphone-based activity classifier by making it detect an activity other than the one they actually performed, for example by shaking the phone while seated to make the classifier detect walking. If they succeeded, we used their motion data to retrain the classifier, and asked them to try to trick it again. The experiment ended when subjects could no longer cheat. We found that some subjects were not able to trick the classifier at all, while others required five rounds of retraining. While classifiers trained on normal activity data predicted true activity with ~38% accuracy, training on the data gathered during the deceptive behavior increased their accuracy to ~84%. We conclude that learning the deceptive behavior of one individual helps to detect the deceptive behavior of others. Thus, we can make current activity recognition robust to deception by including deceptive activity data from a few individuals.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4676610
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46766102015-12-31 Making Activity Recognition Robust against Deceptive Behavior Saeb, Sohrab Körding, Konrad Mohr, David C. PLoS One Research Article Healthcare services increasingly use the activity recognition technology to track the daily activities of individuals. In some cases, this is used to provide incentives. For example, some health insurance companies offer discount to customers who are physically active, based on the data collected from their activity tracking devices. Therefore, there is an increasing motivation for individuals to cheat, by making activity trackers detect activities that increase their benefits rather than the ones they actually do. In this study, we used a novel method to make activity recognition robust against deceptive behavior. We asked 14 subjects to attempt to trick our smartphone-based activity classifier by making it detect an activity other than the one they actually performed, for example by shaking the phone while seated to make the classifier detect walking. If they succeeded, we used their motion data to retrain the classifier, and asked them to try to trick it again. The experiment ended when subjects could no longer cheat. We found that some subjects were not able to trick the classifier at all, while others required five rounds of retraining. While classifiers trained on normal activity data predicted true activity with ~38% accuracy, training on the data gathered during the deceptive behavior increased their accuracy to ~84%. We conclude that learning the deceptive behavior of one individual helps to detect the deceptive behavior of others. Thus, we can make current activity recognition robust to deception by including deceptive activity data from a few individuals. Public Library of Science 2015-12-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4676610/ /pubmed/26659118 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0144795 Text en © 2015 Saeb et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Saeb, Sohrab
Körding, Konrad
Mohr, David C.
Making Activity Recognition Robust against Deceptive Behavior
title Making Activity Recognition Robust against Deceptive Behavior
title_full Making Activity Recognition Robust against Deceptive Behavior
title_fullStr Making Activity Recognition Robust against Deceptive Behavior
title_full_unstemmed Making Activity Recognition Robust against Deceptive Behavior
title_short Making Activity Recognition Robust against Deceptive Behavior
title_sort making activity recognition robust against deceptive behavior
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4676610/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26659118
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0144795
work_keys_str_mv AT saebsohrab makingactivityrecognitionrobustagainstdeceptivebehavior
AT kordingkonrad makingactivityrecognitionrobustagainstdeceptivebehavior
AT mohrdavidc makingactivityrecognitionrobustagainstdeceptivebehavior