Cargando…
Are restrictive guidelines for added sugars science based?
Added sugar regulations and recommendations have been proposed by policy makers around the world. With no universal definition, limited access to added sugar values in food products and no analytical difference from intrinsic sugars, added sugar recommendations present a unique challenge. Average ad...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4676859/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26652250 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12937-015-0114-0 |
_version_ | 1782405244288761856 |
---|---|
author | Erickson, Jennifer Slavin, Joanne |
author_facet | Erickson, Jennifer Slavin, Joanne |
author_sort | Erickson, Jennifer |
collection | PubMed |
description | Added sugar regulations and recommendations have been proposed by policy makers around the world. With no universal definition, limited access to added sugar values in food products and no analytical difference from intrinsic sugars, added sugar recommendations present a unique challenge. Average added sugar intake by American adults is approximately 13 % of total energy intake, and recommendations have been made as low 5 % of total energy intake. In addition to public health recommendations, the Food and Drug Administration has proposed the inclusion of added sugar data to the Nutrition and Supplemental Facts Panel. The adoption of such regulations would have implications for both consumers as well as the food industry. There are certainly advantages to including added sugar data to the Nutrition Facts Panel; however, consumer research does not consistently show the addition of this information to improve consumer knowledge. With excess calorie consumption resulting in weight gain and increased risk of obesity and obesity related co-morbidities, added sugar consumption should be minimized. However, there is currently no evidence stating that added sugar is more harmful than excess calories from any other food source. The addition of restrictive added sugar recommendations may not be the most effective intervention in the treatment and prevention of obesity and other health concerns. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4676859 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46768592015-12-13 Are restrictive guidelines for added sugars science based? Erickson, Jennifer Slavin, Joanne Nutr J Review Added sugar regulations and recommendations have been proposed by policy makers around the world. With no universal definition, limited access to added sugar values in food products and no analytical difference from intrinsic sugars, added sugar recommendations present a unique challenge. Average added sugar intake by American adults is approximately 13 % of total energy intake, and recommendations have been made as low 5 % of total energy intake. In addition to public health recommendations, the Food and Drug Administration has proposed the inclusion of added sugar data to the Nutrition and Supplemental Facts Panel. The adoption of such regulations would have implications for both consumers as well as the food industry. There are certainly advantages to including added sugar data to the Nutrition Facts Panel; however, consumer research does not consistently show the addition of this information to improve consumer knowledge. With excess calorie consumption resulting in weight gain and increased risk of obesity and obesity related co-morbidities, added sugar consumption should be minimized. However, there is currently no evidence stating that added sugar is more harmful than excess calories from any other food source. The addition of restrictive added sugar recommendations may not be the most effective intervention in the treatment and prevention of obesity and other health concerns. BioMed Central 2015-12-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4676859/ /pubmed/26652250 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12937-015-0114-0 Text en © Erickson and Slavin. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Review Erickson, Jennifer Slavin, Joanne Are restrictive guidelines for added sugars science based? |
title | Are restrictive guidelines for added sugars science based? |
title_full | Are restrictive guidelines for added sugars science based? |
title_fullStr | Are restrictive guidelines for added sugars science based? |
title_full_unstemmed | Are restrictive guidelines for added sugars science based? |
title_short | Are restrictive guidelines for added sugars science based? |
title_sort | are restrictive guidelines for added sugars science based? |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4676859/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26652250 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12937-015-0114-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ericksonjennifer arerestrictiveguidelinesforaddedsugarssciencebased AT slavinjoanne arerestrictiveguidelinesforaddedsugarssciencebased |