Cargando…

Are restrictive guidelines for added sugars science based?

Added sugar regulations and recommendations have been proposed by policy makers around the world. With no universal definition, limited access to added sugar values in food products and no analytical difference from intrinsic sugars, added sugar recommendations present a unique challenge. Average ad...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Erickson, Jennifer, Slavin, Joanne
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4676859/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26652250
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12937-015-0114-0
_version_ 1782405244288761856
author Erickson, Jennifer
Slavin, Joanne
author_facet Erickson, Jennifer
Slavin, Joanne
author_sort Erickson, Jennifer
collection PubMed
description Added sugar regulations and recommendations have been proposed by policy makers around the world. With no universal definition, limited access to added sugar values in food products and no analytical difference from intrinsic sugars, added sugar recommendations present a unique challenge. Average added sugar intake by American adults is approximately 13 % of total energy intake, and recommendations have been made as low 5 % of total energy intake. In addition to public health recommendations, the Food and Drug Administration has proposed the inclusion of added sugar data to the Nutrition and Supplemental Facts Panel. The adoption of such regulations would have implications for both consumers as well as the food industry. There are certainly advantages to including added sugar data to the Nutrition Facts Panel; however, consumer research does not consistently show the addition of this information to improve consumer knowledge. With excess calorie consumption resulting in weight gain and increased risk of obesity and obesity related co-morbidities, added sugar consumption should be minimized. However, there is currently no evidence stating that added sugar is more harmful than excess calories from any other food source. The addition of restrictive added sugar recommendations may not be the most effective intervention in the treatment and prevention of obesity and other health concerns.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4676859
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46768592015-12-13 Are restrictive guidelines for added sugars science based? Erickson, Jennifer Slavin, Joanne Nutr J Review Added sugar regulations and recommendations have been proposed by policy makers around the world. With no universal definition, limited access to added sugar values in food products and no analytical difference from intrinsic sugars, added sugar recommendations present a unique challenge. Average added sugar intake by American adults is approximately 13 % of total energy intake, and recommendations have been made as low 5 % of total energy intake. In addition to public health recommendations, the Food and Drug Administration has proposed the inclusion of added sugar data to the Nutrition and Supplemental Facts Panel. The adoption of such regulations would have implications for both consumers as well as the food industry. There are certainly advantages to including added sugar data to the Nutrition Facts Panel; however, consumer research does not consistently show the addition of this information to improve consumer knowledge. With excess calorie consumption resulting in weight gain and increased risk of obesity and obesity related co-morbidities, added sugar consumption should be minimized. However, there is currently no evidence stating that added sugar is more harmful than excess calories from any other food source. The addition of restrictive added sugar recommendations may not be the most effective intervention in the treatment and prevention of obesity and other health concerns. BioMed Central 2015-12-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4676859/ /pubmed/26652250 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12937-015-0114-0 Text en © Erickson and Slavin. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Review
Erickson, Jennifer
Slavin, Joanne
Are restrictive guidelines for added sugars science based?
title Are restrictive guidelines for added sugars science based?
title_full Are restrictive guidelines for added sugars science based?
title_fullStr Are restrictive guidelines for added sugars science based?
title_full_unstemmed Are restrictive guidelines for added sugars science based?
title_short Are restrictive guidelines for added sugars science based?
title_sort are restrictive guidelines for added sugars science based?
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4676859/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26652250
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12937-015-0114-0
work_keys_str_mv AT ericksonjennifer arerestrictiveguidelinesforaddedsugarssciencebased
AT slavinjoanne arerestrictiveguidelinesforaddedsugarssciencebased