Cargando…

Evaluating a train-the-trainer approach for improving capacity for evidence-based decision making in public health

BACKGROUND: Evidence-based public health gives public health practitioners the tools they need to make choices based on the best and most current evidence. An evidence-based public health training course developed in 1997 by the Prevention Research Center in St. Louis has been taught by a transdisci...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yarber, Laura, Brownson, Carol A., Jacob, Rebekah R., Baker, Elizabeth A., Jones, Ellen, Baumann, Carsten, Deshpande, Anjali D., Gillespie, Kathleen N., Scharff, Darcell P., Brownson, Ross C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4676893/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26652172
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-015-1224-2
_version_ 1782405251783983104
author Yarber, Laura
Brownson, Carol A.
Jacob, Rebekah R.
Baker, Elizabeth A.
Jones, Ellen
Baumann, Carsten
Deshpande, Anjali D.
Gillespie, Kathleen N.
Scharff, Darcell P.
Brownson, Ross C.
author_facet Yarber, Laura
Brownson, Carol A.
Jacob, Rebekah R.
Baker, Elizabeth A.
Jones, Ellen
Baumann, Carsten
Deshpande, Anjali D.
Gillespie, Kathleen N.
Scharff, Darcell P.
Brownson, Ross C.
author_sort Yarber, Laura
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Evidence-based public health gives public health practitioners the tools they need to make choices based on the best and most current evidence. An evidence-based public health training course developed in 1997 by the Prevention Research Center in St. Louis has been taught by a transdisciplinary team multiple times with positive results. In order to scale up evidence-based practices, a train-the-trainer initiative was launched in 2010. METHODS: This study examines the outcomes achieved among participants of courses led by trained state-level faculty. Participants from trainee-led courses in four states (Indiana, Colorado, Nebraska, and Kansas) over three years were asked to complete an online survey. Attempts were made to contact 317 past participants. One-hundred forty-four (50.9 %) reachable participants were included in analysis. Outcomes measured include frequency of use of materials, resources, and other skills or tools from the course; reasons for not using the materials and resources; and benefits from attending the course. Survey responses were tabulated and compared using Chi-square tests. RESULTS: Among the most commonly reported benefits, 88 % of respondents agreed that they acquired knowledge about a new subject, 85 % saw applications for the knowledge to their work, and 78 % agreed the course also improved abilities to make scientifically informed decisions at work. The most commonly reported reasons for not using course content as much as intended included not having enough time to implement evidence-based approaches (42 %); other staff/peers lack training (34 %); and not enough funding for continued training (34 %). The study findings suggest that utilization of course materials and teachings remains relatively high across practitioner groups, whether they were taught by the original trainers or by state-based trainers. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study suggest that train-the-trainer is an effective method for broadly disseminating evidence-based public health principles. Train-the-trainer is less costly than the traditional method and allows for courses to be tailored to local issues, thus making it a viable approach to dissemination and scale up of new public health practices. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12913-015-1224-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4676893
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46768932015-12-13 Evaluating a train-the-trainer approach for improving capacity for evidence-based decision making in public health Yarber, Laura Brownson, Carol A. Jacob, Rebekah R. Baker, Elizabeth A. Jones, Ellen Baumann, Carsten Deshpande, Anjali D. Gillespie, Kathleen N. Scharff, Darcell P. Brownson, Ross C. BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Evidence-based public health gives public health practitioners the tools they need to make choices based on the best and most current evidence. An evidence-based public health training course developed in 1997 by the Prevention Research Center in St. Louis has been taught by a transdisciplinary team multiple times with positive results. In order to scale up evidence-based practices, a train-the-trainer initiative was launched in 2010. METHODS: This study examines the outcomes achieved among participants of courses led by trained state-level faculty. Participants from trainee-led courses in four states (Indiana, Colorado, Nebraska, and Kansas) over three years were asked to complete an online survey. Attempts were made to contact 317 past participants. One-hundred forty-four (50.9 %) reachable participants were included in analysis. Outcomes measured include frequency of use of materials, resources, and other skills or tools from the course; reasons for not using the materials and resources; and benefits from attending the course. Survey responses were tabulated and compared using Chi-square tests. RESULTS: Among the most commonly reported benefits, 88 % of respondents agreed that they acquired knowledge about a new subject, 85 % saw applications for the knowledge to their work, and 78 % agreed the course also improved abilities to make scientifically informed decisions at work. The most commonly reported reasons for not using course content as much as intended included not having enough time to implement evidence-based approaches (42 %); other staff/peers lack training (34 %); and not enough funding for continued training (34 %). The study findings suggest that utilization of course materials and teachings remains relatively high across practitioner groups, whether they were taught by the original trainers or by state-based trainers. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study suggest that train-the-trainer is an effective method for broadly disseminating evidence-based public health principles. Train-the-trainer is less costly than the traditional method and allows for courses to be tailored to local issues, thus making it a viable approach to dissemination and scale up of new public health practices. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12913-015-1224-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-12-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4676893/ /pubmed/26652172 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-015-1224-2 Text en © Yarber et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Yarber, Laura
Brownson, Carol A.
Jacob, Rebekah R.
Baker, Elizabeth A.
Jones, Ellen
Baumann, Carsten
Deshpande, Anjali D.
Gillespie, Kathleen N.
Scharff, Darcell P.
Brownson, Ross C.
Evaluating a train-the-trainer approach for improving capacity for evidence-based decision making in public health
title Evaluating a train-the-trainer approach for improving capacity for evidence-based decision making in public health
title_full Evaluating a train-the-trainer approach for improving capacity for evidence-based decision making in public health
title_fullStr Evaluating a train-the-trainer approach for improving capacity for evidence-based decision making in public health
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating a train-the-trainer approach for improving capacity for evidence-based decision making in public health
title_short Evaluating a train-the-trainer approach for improving capacity for evidence-based decision making in public health
title_sort evaluating a train-the-trainer approach for improving capacity for evidence-based decision making in public health
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4676893/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26652172
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-015-1224-2
work_keys_str_mv AT yarberlaura evaluatingatrainthetrainerapproachforimprovingcapacityforevidencebaseddecisionmakinginpublichealth
AT brownsoncarola evaluatingatrainthetrainerapproachforimprovingcapacityforevidencebaseddecisionmakinginpublichealth
AT jacobrebekahr evaluatingatrainthetrainerapproachforimprovingcapacityforevidencebaseddecisionmakinginpublichealth
AT bakerelizabetha evaluatingatrainthetrainerapproachforimprovingcapacityforevidencebaseddecisionmakinginpublichealth
AT jonesellen evaluatingatrainthetrainerapproachforimprovingcapacityforevidencebaseddecisionmakinginpublichealth
AT baumanncarsten evaluatingatrainthetrainerapproachforimprovingcapacityforevidencebaseddecisionmakinginpublichealth
AT deshpandeanjalid evaluatingatrainthetrainerapproachforimprovingcapacityforevidencebaseddecisionmakinginpublichealth
AT gillespiekathleenn evaluatingatrainthetrainerapproachforimprovingcapacityforevidencebaseddecisionmakinginpublichealth
AT scharffdarcellp evaluatingatrainthetrainerapproachforimprovingcapacityforevidencebaseddecisionmakinginpublichealth
AT brownsonrossc evaluatingatrainthetrainerapproachforimprovingcapacityforevidencebaseddecisionmakinginpublichealth