Cargando…

Patient Benefit-Risk Tradeoffs for Radioactive Iodine-Refractory Differentiated Thyroid Cancer Treatments

Background. The aims of this study were to assess patients' preferences to wait or start systemic treatment and understand how patients would make tradeoffs between certain severe adverse events (AEs) and additional months of progression-free survival (PFS). Materials and Methods. Adults in Fra...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mohamed, Ateesha F., González, Juan Marcos, Fairchild, Angelyn
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4677225/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26697261
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/438235
_version_ 1782405295846195200
author Mohamed, Ateesha F.
González, Juan Marcos
Fairchild, Angelyn
author_facet Mohamed, Ateesha F.
González, Juan Marcos
Fairchild, Angelyn
author_sort Mohamed, Ateesha F.
collection PubMed
description Background. The aims of this study were to assess patients' preferences to wait or start systemic treatment and understand how patients would make tradeoffs between certain severe adverse events (AEs) and additional months of progression-free survival (PFS). Materials and Methods. Adults in France, Germany, and Spain with a diagnosis of DTC and who have had at least one RAI treatment completed a direct-elicitation question and a discrete-choice experiment (DCE) online. The direct-elicitation question asked respondents whether they would opt out of treatment when their tumor is RAI-R. In the DCE, respondents chose between 12 pairs of hypothetical RAI-R DTC treatment profiles. Profiles were defined by magnitudes of efficacy (PFS) and safety (severe hand-foot skin reaction [HFSR], severe proteinuria, and severe hypertension). A main-effects random-parameters logit model was estimated. Results. 134 patients completed the survey. Most patients (86.6%) opted for treatment rather than “wait and see” decision. Patients placed a greater weight on the risk of severe hypertension than the risk of proteinuria and HFSR. Conclusions. DTC patients showed preference toward treatment for RAI-R DTC over watchful waiting. Patients' concerns about the risk of severe hypertension appeared to have had a greater effect on patients' choice than severe proteinuria or HFSR.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4677225
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46772252015-12-22 Patient Benefit-Risk Tradeoffs for Radioactive Iodine-Refractory Differentiated Thyroid Cancer Treatments Mohamed, Ateesha F. González, Juan Marcos Fairchild, Angelyn J Thyroid Res Research Article Background. The aims of this study were to assess patients' preferences to wait or start systemic treatment and understand how patients would make tradeoffs between certain severe adverse events (AEs) and additional months of progression-free survival (PFS). Materials and Methods. Adults in France, Germany, and Spain with a diagnosis of DTC and who have had at least one RAI treatment completed a direct-elicitation question and a discrete-choice experiment (DCE) online. The direct-elicitation question asked respondents whether they would opt out of treatment when their tumor is RAI-R. In the DCE, respondents chose between 12 pairs of hypothetical RAI-R DTC treatment profiles. Profiles were defined by magnitudes of efficacy (PFS) and safety (severe hand-foot skin reaction [HFSR], severe proteinuria, and severe hypertension). A main-effects random-parameters logit model was estimated. Results. 134 patients completed the survey. Most patients (86.6%) opted for treatment rather than “wait and see” decision. Patients placed a greater weight on the risk of severe hypertension than the risk of proteinuria and HFSR. Conclusions. DTC patients showed preference toward treatment for RAI-R DTC over watchful waiting. Patients' concerns about the risk of severe hypertension appeared to have had a greater effect on patients' choice than severe proteinuria or HFSR. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2015 2015-11-30 /pmc/articles/PMC4677225/ /pubmed/26697261 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/438235 Text en Copyright © 2015 Ateesha F. Mohamed et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Mohamed, Ateesha F.
González, Juan Marcos
Fairchild, Angelyn
Patient Benefit-Risk Tradeoffs for Radioactive Iodine-Refractory Differentiated Thyroid Cancer Treatments
title Patient Benefit-Risk Tradeoffs for Radioactive Iodine-Refractory Differentiated Thyroid Cancer Treatments
title_full Patient Benefit-Risk Tradeoffs for Radioactive Iodine-Refractory Differentiated Thyroid Cancer Treatments
title_fullStr Patient Benefit-Risk Tradeoffs for Radioactive Iodine-Refractory Differentiated Thyroid Cancer Treatments
title_full_unstemmed Patient Benefit-Risk Tradeoffs for Radioactive Iodine-Refractory Differentiated Thyroid Cancer Treatments
title_short Patient Benefit-Risk Tradeoffs for Radioactive Iodine-Refractory Differentiated Thyroid Cancer Treatments
title_sort patient benefit-risk tradeoffs for radioactive iodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer treatments
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4677225/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26697261
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/438235
work_keys_str_mv AT mohamedateeshaf patientbenefitrisktradeoffsforradioactiveiodinerefractorydifferentiatedthyroidcancertreatments
AT gonzalezjuanmarcos patientbenefitrisktradeoffsforradioactiveiodinerefractorydifferentiatedthyroidcancertreatments
AT fairchildangelyn patientbenefitrisktradeoffsforradioactiveiodinerefractorydifferentiatedthyroidcancertreatments