Cargando…

Optical coherence tomography imaging during percutaneous coronary intervention impacts physician decision-making: ILUMIEN I study

AIMS: ILUMIEN I is the largest prospective, non-randomized, observational study of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) procedural practice in patients undergoing intra-procedural pre- and post-PCI fractional flow reserve (FFR) and optical coherence tomography (OCT). We report on the impact of O...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wijns, William, Shite, Junya, Jones, Michael R., Lee, Stephen W.-L., Price, Matthew J., Fabbiocchi, Franco, Barbato, Emanuele, Akasaka, Takashi, Bezerra, Hiram, Holmes, David
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4677272/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26242713
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehv367
_version_ 1782405304016699392
author Wijns, William
Shite, Junya
Jones, Michael R.
Lee, Stephen W.-L.
Price, Matthew J.
Fabbiocchi, Franco
Barbato, Emanuele
Akasaka, Takashi
Bezerra, Hiram
Holmes, David
author_facet Wijns, William
Shite, Junya
Jones, Michael R.
Lee, Stephen W.-L.
Price, Matthew J.
Fabbiocchi, Franco
Barbato, Emanuele
Akasaka, Takashi
Bezerra, Hiram
Holmes, David
author_sort Wijns, William
collection PubMed
description AIMS: ILUMIEN I is the largest prospective, non-randomized, observational study of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) procedural practice in patients undergoing intra-procedural pre- and post-PCI fractional flow reserve (FFR) and optical coherence tomography (OCT). We report on the impact of OCT on physician decision-making and the association with post-PCI FFR values and early clinical events. METHODS AND RESULTS: Optical coherence tomography and documentary FFR were performed pre- and post-PCI in 418 patients (with 467 stenoses) with stable or unstable angina or NSTEMI. Based on pre-PCI OCT, the procedure was altered in 55% of patients (57% of all stenoses) by selecting different stent lengths (shorter in 25%, longer in 43%). After clinically satisfactory stent implantation using angiographic guidance, post-PCI FFR and OCT were repeated. Optical coherence tomography abnormalities deemed unsatisfactory by the implanting physician were identified: 14.5% malapposition, 7.6% under-expansion, 2.7% edge dissection and prompted further stent optimization based on OCT in 25% of patients (27% of all stenoses) using additional in-stent post-dilatation (81%, 101/124) or placement of 20 new stents (12%). Optimization subgroups were identified post hoc: stent placement without reaction to OCT findings (n = 137), change in PCI planning by pre-PCI OCT (n = 165), post-PCI optimization based on post-PCI OCT (n = 41), change in PCI planning, and post-PCI optimization based on OCT (n = 65). Post-PCI FFR values were significantly different (P = 0.003) between optimization groups (lower in cases with pre- and post-PCI reaction to OCT) but no longer different after post-PCI stent optimization. MACE events at 30 days were low: death 0.25%, MI 7.7%, repeat PCI 1.7%, and stent thrombosis 0.25%. CONCLUSION: Physician decision-making was affected by OCT imaging prior to PCI in 57% and post-PCI in 27% of all cases. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT01663896, Observational Study of Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) in Patients Undergoing Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (ILUMIEN I).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4677272
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46772722015-12-16 Optical coherence tomography imaging during percutaneous coronary intervention impacts physician decision-making: ILUMIEN I study Wijns, William Shite, Junya Jones, Michael R. Lee, Stephen W.-L. Price, Matthew J. Fabbiocchi, Franco Barbato, Emanuele Akasaka, Takashi Bezerra, Hiram Holmes, David Eur Heart J FASTTRACK TO EuroPCR AIMS: ILUMIEN I is the largest prospective, non-randomized, observational study of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) procedural practice in patients undergoing intra-procedural pre- and post-PCI fractional flow reserve (FFR) and optical coherence tomography (OCT). We report on the impact of OCT on physician decision-making and the association with post-PCI FFR values and early clinical events. METHODS AND RESULTS: Optical coherence tomography and documentary FFR were performed pre- and post-PCI in 418 patients (with 467 stenoses) with stable or unstable angina or NSTEMI. Based on pre-PCI OCT, the procedure was altered in 55% of patients (57% of all stenoses) by selecting different stent lengths (shorter in 25%, longer in 43%). After clinically satisfactory stent implantation using angiographic guidance, post-PCI FFR and OCT were repeated. Optical coherence tomography abnormalities deemed unsatisfactory by the implanting physician were identified: 14.5% malapposition, 7.6% under-expansion, 2.7% edge dissection and prompted further stent optimization based on OCT in 25% of patients (27% of all stenoses) using additional in-stent post-dilatation (81%, 101/124) or placement of 20 new stents (12%). Optimization subgroups were identified post hoc: stent placement without reaction to OCT findings (n = 137), change in PCI planning by pre-PCI OCT (n = 165), post-PCI optimization based on post-PCI OCT (n = 41), change in PCI planning, and post-PCI optimization based on OCT (n = 65). Post-PCI FFR values were significantly different (P = 0.003) between optimization groups (lower in cases with pre- and post-PCI reaction to OCT) but no longer different after post-PCI stent optimization. MACE events at 30 days were low: death 0.25%, MI 7.7%, repeat PCI 1.7%, and stent thrombosis 0.25%. CONCLUSION: Physician decision-making was affected by OCT imaging prior to PCI in 57% and post-PCI in 27% of all cases. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT01663896, Observational Study of Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) in Patients Undergoing Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (ILUMIEN I). Oxford University Press 2015-12-14 2015-08-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4677272/ /pubmed/26242713 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehv367 Text en © The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle FASTTRACK TO EuroPCR
Wijns, William
Shite, Junya
Jones, Michael R.
Lee, Stephen W.-L.
Price, Matthew J.
Fabbiocchi, Franco
Barbato, Emanuele
Akasaka, Takashi
Bezerra, Hiram
Holmes, David
Optical coherence tomography imaging during percutaneous coronary intervention impacts physician decision-making: ILUMIEN I study
title Optical coherence tomography imaging during percutaneous coronary intervention impacts physician decision-making: ILUMIEN I study
title_full Optical coherence tomography imaging during percutaneous coronary intervention impacts physician decision-making: ILUMIEN I study
title_fullStr Optical coherence tomography imaging during percutaneous coronary intervention impacts physician decision-making: ILUMIEN I study
title_full_unstemmed Optical coherence tomography imaging during percutaneous coronary intervention impacts physician decision-making: ILUMIEN I study
title_short Optical coherence tomography imaging during percutaneous coronary intervention impacts physician decision-making: ILUMIEN I study
title_sort optical coherence tomography imaging during percutaneous coronary intervention impacts physician decision-making: ilumien i study
topic FASTTRACK TO EuroPCR
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4677272/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26242713
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehv367
work_keys_str_mv AT wijnswilliam opticalcoherencetomographyimagingduringpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionimpactsphysiciandecisionmakingilumienistudy
AT shitejunya opticalcoherencetomographyimagingduringpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionimpactsphysiciandecisionmakingilumienistudy
AT jonesmichaelr opticalcoherencetomographyimagingduringpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionimpactsphysiciandecisionmakingilumienistudy
AT leestephenwl opticalcoherencetomographyimagingduringpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionimpactsphysiciandecisionmakingilumienistudy
AT pricematthewj opticalcoherencetomographyimagingduringpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionimpactsphysiciandecisionmakingilumienistudy
AT fabbiocchifranco opticalcoherencetomographyimagingduringpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionimpactsphysiciandecisionmakingilumienistudy
AT barbatoemanuele opticalcoherencetomographyimagingduringpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionimpactsphysiciandecisionmakingilumienistudy
AT akasakatakashi opticalcoherencetomographyimagingduringpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionimpactsphysiciandecisionmakingilumienistudy
AT bezerrahiram opticalcoherencetomographyimagingduringpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionimpactsphysiciandecisionmakingilumienistudy
AT holmesdavid opticalcoherencetomographyimagingduringpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionimpactsphysiciandecisionmakingilumienistudy