Cargando…
Suspended sediments limit coral sperm availability
Suspended sediment from dredging activities and natural resuspension events represent a risk to the reproductive processes of coral, and therefore the ongoing maintenance of reefal populations. To investigate the underlying mechanisms that could reduce the fertilisation success in turbid water, we c...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4677285/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26659008 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep18084 |
_version_ | 1782405306782842880 |
---|---|
author | Ricardo, Gerard F. Jones, Ross J. Clode, Peta L. Humanes, Adriana Negri, Andrew P. |
author_facet | Ricardo, Gerard F. Jones, Ross J. Clode, Peta L. Humanes, Adriana Negri, Andrew P. |
author_sort | Ricardo, Gerard F. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Suspended sediment from dredging activities and natural resuspension events represent a risk to the reproductive processes of coral, and therefore the ongoing maintenance of reefal populations. To investigate the underlying mechanisms that could reduce the fertilisation success in turbid water, we conducted several experiments exposing gametes of the corals Acropora tenuis and A. millepora to two sediment types. Sperm limitation was identified in the presence of siliciclastic sediment (230 and ~700 mg L(−1)), with 2–37 fold more sperm required to achieve maximum fertilisation rates, when compared with sediment-free treatments. This effect was more pronounced at sub-optimum sperm concentrations. Considerable (>45%) decreases in sperm concentration at the water’s surface was recorded in the presence of siliciclastic sediment and a >20% decrease for carbonate sediment. Electron microscopy then confirmed sediment entangled sperm and we propose entrapment and sinking is the primary mechanism reducing sperm available to the egg. Longer exposure to suspended sediments and gamete aging further decreased fertilisation success when compared with a shorter exposure. Collectively, these findings demonstrate that high concentrations of suspended sediments effectively remove sperm from the water’s surface during coral spawning events, reducing the window for fertilisation with potential subsequent flow-on effects for recruitment. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4677285 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46772852015-12-17 Suspended sediments limit coral sperm availability Ricardo, Gerard F. Jones, Ross J. Clode, Peta L. Humanes, Adriana Negri, Andrew P. Sci Rep Article Suspended sediment from dredging activities and natural resuspension events represent a risk to the reproductive processes of coral, and therefore the ongoing maintenance of reefal populations. To investigate the underlying mechanisms that could reduce the fertilisation success in turbid water, we conducted several experiments exposing gametes of the corals Acropora tenuis and A. millepora to two sediment types. Sperm limitation was identified in the presence of siliciclastic sediment (230 and ~700 mg L(−1)), with 2–37 fold more sperm required to achieve maximum fertilisation rates, when compared with sediment-free treatments. This effect was more pronounced at sub-optimum sperm concentrations. Considerable (>45%) decreases in sperm concentration at the water’s surface was recorded in the presence of siliciclastic sediment and a >20% decrease for carbonate sediment. Electron microscopy then confirmed sediment entangled sperm and we propose entrapment and sinking is the primary mechanism reducing sperm available to the egg. Longer exposure to suspended sediments and gamete aging further decreased fertilisation success when compared with a shorter exposure. Collectively, these findings demonstrate that high concentrations of suspended sediments effectively remove sperm from the water’s surface during coral spawning events, reducing the window for fertilisation with potential subsequent flow-on effects for recruitment. Nature Publishing Group 2015-12-14 /pmc/articles/PMC4677285/ /pubmed/26659008 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep18084 Text en Copyright © 2015, Macmillan Publishers Limited http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Article Ricardo, Gerard F. Jones, Ross J. Clode, Peta L. Humanes, Adriana Negri, Andrew P. Suspended sediments limit coral sperm availability |
title | Suspended sediments limit coral sperm availability |
title_full | Suspended sediments limit coral sperm availability |
title_fullStr | Suspended sediments limit coral sperm availability |
title_full_unstemmed | Suspended sediments limit coral sperm availability |
title_short | Suspended sediments limit coral sperm availability |
title_sort | suspended sediments limit coral sperm availability |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4677285/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26659008 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep18084 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ricardogerardf suspendedsedimentslimitcoralspermavailability AT jonesrossj suspendedsedimentslimitcoralspermavailability AT clodepetal suspendedsedimentslimitcoralspermavailability AT humanesadriana suspendedsedimentslimitcoralspermavailability AT negriandrewp suspendedsedimentslimitcoralspermavailability |