Cargando…

Clinical and programming pattern of patients with impending deep brain stimulation power failure: a retrospective chart review

BACKGROUND: It is important to prevent complications of implanted pulse generators (IPG) depletion by replacing the IPG in time. METHODS: We reviewed the charts of all patients with deep brain stimulation treated movement disorders who were seen at our institution over a period of 6 months. Among th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mehanna, Raja, Wilson, Kathy M, Cooper, Scott E, Machado, Andre G, Fernandez, Hubert H
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4677734/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26788332
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2054-7072-1-6
_version_ 1782405363831668736
author Mehanna, Raja
Wilson, Kathy M
Cooper, Scott E
Machado, Andre G
Fernandez, Hubert H
author_facet Mehanna, Raja
Wilson, Kathy M
Cooper, Scott E
Machado, Andre G
Fernandez, Hubert H
author_sort Mehanna, Raja
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: It is important to prevent complications of implanted pulse generators (IPG) depletion by replacing the IPG in time. METHODS: We reviewed the charts of all patients with deep brain stimulation treated movement disorders who were seen at our institution over a period of 6 months. Among these, we retained for analyses those who had undergone IPG replacement within the previous 3 years. RESULTS: A total of 55 IPG replacements (from 38 patients) were reviewed. Electrodes were implanted in the subthalamic nucleus in all Parkinson’s disease patients, in the ventral intermedius nucleus of the thalamus in all essential tremor patients and in the globus pallidus interna in all dystonia patients. Replacements were preceded by a voltage increase due to worsened symptoms in 27.3% (15/55); 25.5% (14/55) had full IPG depletion or had too low IPG reserve to allow for any voltage adjustment; and 21.7% (12/55) did not get a needed voltage increase either for safety reasons (eg: concern for increase in falls with higher voltages) or because the surgery date for IPG replacement was close. Only 25.5% (14/55) remained clinically well-controlled prior to IPG replacement, all of whom had IPG longevity estimates available. Clinical deterioration was noted prior to IPG replacement in 100% of patients without available longevity estimates versus 61% of patients with available longevity estimates (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Despite best efforts, clinical deterioration prior to IPG replacement can be seen frequently. Routine estimation of IPG life, along with symptom assessment at every follow-up visit may prevent it. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/2054-7072-1-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4677734
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46777342016-01-19 Clinical and programming pattern of patients with impending deep brain stimulation power failure: a retrospective chart review Mehanna, Raja Wilson, Kathy M Cooper, Scott E Machado, Andre G Fernandez, Hubert H J Clin Mov Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: It is important to prevent complications of implanted pulse generators (IPG) depletion by replacing the IPG in time. METHODS: We reviewed the charts of all patients with deep brain stimulation treated movement disorders who were seen at our institution over a period of 6 months. Among these, we retained for analyses those who had undergone IPG replacement within the previous 3 years. RESULTS: A total of 55 IPG replacements (from 38 patients) were reviewed. Electrodes were implanted in the subthalamic nucleus in all Parkinson’s disease patients, in the ventral intermedius nucleus of the thalamus in all essential tremor patients and in the globus pallidus interna in all dystonia patients. Replacements were preceded by a voltage increase due to worsened symptoms in 27.3% (15/55); 25.5% (14/55) had full IPG depletion or had too low IPG reserve to allow for any voltage adjustment; and 21.7% (12/55) did not get a needed voltage increase either for safety reasons (eg: concern for increase in falls with higher voltages) or because the surgery date for IPG replacement was close. Only 25.5% (14/55) remained clinically well-controlled prior to IPG replacement, all of whom had IPG longevity estimates available. Clinical deterioration was noted prior to IPG replacement in 100% of patients without available longevity estimates versus 61% of patients with available longevity estimates (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Despite best efforts, clinical deterioration prior to IPG replacement can be seen frequently. Routine estimation of IPG life, along with symptom assessment at every follow-up visit may prevent it. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/2054-7072-1-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2014-11-20 /pmc/articles/PMC4677734/ /pubmed/26788332 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2054-7072-1-6 Text en © Mehanna et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Mehanna, Raja
Wilson, Kathy M
Cooper, Scott E
Machado, Andre G
Fernandez, Hubert H
Clinical and programming pattern of patients with impending deep brain stimulation power failure: a retrospective chart review
title Clinical and programming pattern of patients with impending deep brain stimulation power failure: a retrospective chart review
title_full Clinical and programming pattern of patients with impending deep brain stimulation power failure: a retrospective chart review
title_fullStr Clinical and programming pattern of patients with impending deep brain stimulation power failure: a retrospective chart review
title_full_unstemmed Clinical and programming pattern of patients with impending deep brain stimulation power failure: a retrospective chart review
title_short Clinical and programming pattern of patients with impending deep brain stimulation power failure: a retrospective chart review
title_sort clinical and programming pattern of patients with impending deep brain stimulation power failure: a retrospective chart review
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4677734/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26788332
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2054-7072-1-6
work_keys_str_mv AT mehannaraja clinicalandprogrammingpatternofpatientswithimpendingdeepbrainstimulationpowerfailurearetrospectivechartreview
AT wilsonkathym clinicalandprogrammingpatternofpatientswithimpendingdeepbrainstimulationpowerfailurearetrospectivechartreview
AT cooperscotte clinicalandprogrammingpatternofpatientswithimpendingdeepbrainstimulationpowerfailurearetrospectivechartreview
AT machadoandreg clinicalandprogrammingpatternofpatientswithimpendingdeepbrainstimulationpowerfailurearetrospectivechartreview
AT fernandezhuberth clinicalandprogrammingpatternofpatientswithimpendingdeepbrainstimulationpowerfailurearetrospectivechartreview