Cargando…
Comparison of obstetric anal sphincter injuries in nulliparous women before and after introduction of the EPISCISSORS-60(®) at two hospitals in the United Kingdom
AIM: To assess whether the introduction of episiotomy scissors specially designed to achieve a cutting angle of 60°, EPISCISSORS-60(®), in two hospitals in the UK would result in a reduction in obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) in nulliparous women. METHODS: A structured training program for...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4677767/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26677344 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJWH.S94680 |
_version_ | 1782405371341570048 |
---|---|
author | van Roon, Yves Kirwin, Ciara Rahman, Nadia Vinayakarao, Latha Melson, Louise Kester, Nikki Pathak, Sangeeta Pradhan, Ashish |
author_facet | van Roon, Yves Kirwin, Ciara Rahman, Nadia Vinayakarao, Latha Melson, Louise Kester, Nikki Pathak, Sangeeta Pradhan, Ashish |
author_sort | van Roon, Yves |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIM: To assess whether the introduction of episiotomy scissors specially designed to achieve a cutting angle of 60°, EPISCISSORS-60(®), in two hospitals in the UK would result in a reduction in obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) in nulliparous women. METHODS: A structured training program for all doctors and midwives provided a theoretical framework around OASIS including risk factors and the role of episiotomies and a practical hands-on training element to use EPISCISSORS-60(®) correctly and to measure perineal body length and post-suturing angles. Data for perineal body length, post-suturing angles, user feedback, episiotomy use, and incidence of OASIS were collected through specifically designed forms and the general hospital data collection system. RESULTS: Data were available for 838 nulliparous vaginal deliveries. Mean perineal body length was 37 mm in spontaneous vaginal delivery group (standard deviation [SD] =8.3, 95% confidence interval [CI] =34–39) and 38 mm in the operative vaginal delivery group (SD=8, 95% CI=35–40). Post-suturing episiotomy angles were 53° (SD=6.5, 95% CI=50.7–55.8) in spontaneous vaginal deliveries and 52° (SD=9.6, 95% CI=49–54) in operative vaginal deliveries. EPISCISSORS-60(®) were rated as “good” to “very good” by 84% of users. There was a 47% increase in the number of episiotomies in nulliparous spontaneous vaginal deliveries at Poole (P=0.007) and a 16.5% increase in the number of episiotomies in nulliparous operative vaginal deliveries in Hinchingbrooke (P=0.003). There was an overall 11% increase in episiotomy numbers in nulliparous vaginal deliveries (P=0.08). There was a statistically significant OASIS reduction of 84% in nulliparous spontaneous vaginal deliveries in women who received an episiotomy (P=0.003). CONCLUSION: Initial results after introduction of EPISCISSORS-60(®) show that the majority of health care professionals achieve post-suturing episiotomy angles between 40° and 60°. The results also show a significant increase in the use of episiotomies in the delivery of nulliparous women. There has been a statistically significant reduction in OASIS in nulliparous spontaneous vaginal deliveries. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4677767 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Dove Medical Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46777672015-12-16 Comparison of obstetric anal sphincter injuries in nulliparous women before and after introduction of the EPISCISSORS-60(®) at two hospitals in the United Kingdom van Roon, Yves Kirwin, Ciara Rahman, Nadia Vinayakarao, Latha Melson, Louise Kester, Nikki Pathak, Sangeeta Pradhan, Ashish Int J Womens Health Original Research AIM: To assess whether the introduction of episiotomy scissors specially designed to achieve a cutting angle of 60°, EPISCISSORS-60(®), in two hospitals in the UK would result in a reduction in obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) in nulliparous women. METHODS: A structured training program for all doctors and midwives provided a theoretical framework around OASIS including risk factors and the role of episiotomies and a practical hands-on training element to use EPISCISSORS-60(®) correctly and to measure perineal body length and post-suturing angles. Data for perineal body length, post-suturing angles, user feedback, episiotomy use, and incidence of OASIS were collected through specifically designed forms and the general hospital data collection system. RESULTS: Data were available for 838 nulliparous vaginal deliveries. Mean perineal body length was 37 mm in spontaneous vaginal delivery group (standard deviation [SD] =8.3, 95% confidence interval [CI] =34–39) and 38 mm in the operative vaginal delivery group (SD=8, 95% CI=35–40). Post-suturing episiotomy angles were 53° (SD=6.5, 95% CI=50.7–55.8) in spontaneous vaginal deliveries and 52° (SD=9.6, 95% CI=49–54) in operative vaginal deliveries. EPISCISSORS-60(®) were rated as “good” to “very good” by 84% of users. There was a 47% increase in the number of episiotomies in nulliparous spontaneous vaginal deliveries at Poole (P=0.007) and a 16.5% increase in the number of episiotomies in nulliparous operative vaginal deliveries in Hinchingbrooke (P=0.003). There was an overall 11% increase in episiotomy numbers in nulliparous vaginal deliveries (P=0.08). There was a statistically significant OASIS reduction of 84% in nulliparous spontaneous vaginal deliveries in women who received an episiotomy (P=0.003). CONCLUSION: Initial results after introduction of EPISCISSORS-60(®) show that the majority of health care professionals achieve post-suturing episiotomy angles between 40° and 60°. The results also show a significant increase in the use of episiotomies in the delivery of nulliparous women. There has been a statistically significant reduction in OASIS in nulliparous spontaneous vaginal deliveries. Dove Medical Press 2015-12-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4677767/ /pubmed/26677344 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJWH.S94680 Text en © 2015 van Roon et al. This work is published by Dove Medical Press Limited, and licensed under Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License The full terms of the License are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. |
spellingShingle | Original Research van Roon, Yves Kirwin, Ciara Rahman, Nadia Vinayakarao, Latha Melson, Louise Kester, Nikki Pathak, Sangeeta Pradhan, Ashish Comparison of obstetric anal sphincter injuries in nulliparous women before and after introduction of the EPISCISSORS-60(®) at two hospitals in the United Kingdom |
title | Comparison of obstetric anal sphincter injuries in nulliparous women before and after introduction of the EPISCISSORS-60(®) at two hospitals in the United Kingdom |
title_full | Comparison of obstetric anal sphincter injuries in nulliparous women before and after introduction of the EPISCISSORS-60(®) at two hospitals in the United Kingdom |
title_fullStr | Comparison of obstetric anal sphincter injuries in nulliparous women before and after introduction of the EPISCISSORS-60(®) at two hospitals in the United Kingdom |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of obstetric anal sphincter injuries in nulliparous women before and after introduction of the EPISCISSORS-60(®) at two hospitals in the United Kingdom |
title_short | Comparison of obstetric anal sphincter injuries in nulliparous women before and after introduction of the EPISCISSORS-60(®) at two hospitals in the United Kingdom |
title_sort | comparison of obstetric anal sphincter injuries in nulliparous women before and after introduction of the episcissors-60(®) at two hospitals in the united kingdom |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4677767/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26677344 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJWH.S94680 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vanroonyves comparisonofobstetricanalsphincterinjuriesinnulliparouswomenbeforeandafterintroductionoftheepiscissors60attwohospitalsintheunitedkingdom AT kirwinciara comparisonofobstetricanalsphincterinjuriesinnulliparouswomenbeforeandafterintroductionoftheepiscissors60attwohospitalsintheunitedkingdom AT rahmannadia comparisonofobstetricanalsphincterinjuriesinnulliparouswomenbeforeandafterintroductionoftheepiscissors60attwohospitalsintheunitedkingdom AT vinayakaraolatha comparisonofobstetricanalsphincterinjuriesinnulliparouswomenbeforeandafterintroductionoftheepiscissors60attwohospitalsintheunitedkingdom AT melsonlouise comparisonofobstetricanalsphincterinjuriesinnulliparouswomenbeforeandafterintroductionoftheepiscissors60attwohospitalsintheunitedkingdom AT kesternikki comparisonofobstetricanalsphincterinjuriesinnulliparouswomenbeforeandafterintroductionoftheepiscissors60attwohospitalsintheunitedkingdom AT pathaksangeeta comparisonofobstetricanalsphincterinjuriesinnulliparouswomenbeforeandafterintroductionoftheepiscissors60attwohospitalsintheunitedkingdom AT pradhanashish comparisonofobstetricanalsphincterinjuriesinnulliparouswomenbeforeandafterintroductionoftheepiscissors60attwohospitalsintheunitedkingdom |