Cargando…

Comparison of obstetric anal sphincter injuries in nulliparous women before and after introduction of the EPISCISSORS-60(®) at two hospitals in the United Kingdom

AIM: To assess whether the introduction of episiotomy scissors specially designed to achieve a cutting angle of 60°, EPISCISSORS-60(®), in two hospitals in the UK would result in a reduction in obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) in nulliparous women. METHODS: A structured training program for...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van Roon, Yves, Kirwin, Ciara, Rahman, Nadia, Vinayakarao, Latha, Melson, Louise, Kester, Nikki, Pathak, Sangeeta, Pradhan, Ashish
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4677767/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26677344
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJWH.S94680
_version_ 1782405371341570048
author van Roon, Yves
Kirwin, Ciara
Rahman, Nadia
Vinayakarao, Latha
Melson, Louise
Kester, Nikki
Pathak, Sangeeta
Pradhan, Ashish
author_facet van Roon, Yves
Kirwin, Ciara
Rahman, Nadia
Vinayakarao, Latha
Melson, Louise
Kester, Nikki
Pathak, Sangeeta
Pradhan, Ashish
author_sort van Roon, Yves
collection PubMed
description AIM: To assess whether the introduction of episiotomy scissors specially designed to achieve a cutting angle of 60°, EPISCISSORS-60(®), in two hospitals in the UK would result in a reduction in obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) in nulliparous women. METHODS: A structured training program for all doctors and midwives provided a theoretical framework around OASIS including risk factors and the role of episiotomies and a practical hands-on training element to use EPISCISSORS-60(®) correctly and to measure perineal body length and post-suturing angles. Data for perineal body length, post-suturing angles, user feedback, episiotomy use, and incidence of OASIS were collected through specifically designed forms and the general hospital data collection system. RESULTS: Data were available for 838 nulliparous vaginal deliveries. Mean perineal body length was 37 mm in spontaneous vaginal delivery group (standard deviation [SD] =8.3, 95% confidence interval [CI] =34–39) and 38 mm in the operative vaginal delivery group (SD=8, 95% CI=35–40). Post-suturing episiotomy angles were 53° (SD=6.5, 95% CI=50.7–55.8) in spontaneous vaginal deliveries and 52° (SD=9.6, 95% CI=49–54) in operative vaginal deliveries. EPISCISSORS-60(®) were rated as “good” to “very good” by 84% of users. There was a 47% increase in the number of episiotomies in nulliparous spontaneous vaginal deliveries at Poole (P=0.007) and a 16.5% increase in the number of episiotomies in nulliparous operative vaginal deliveries in Hinchingbrooke (P=0.003). There was an overall 11% increase in episiotomy numbers in nulliparous vaginal deliveries (P=0.08). There was a statistically significant OASIS reduction of 84% in nulliparous spontaneous vaginal deliveries in women who received an episiotomy (P=0.003). CONCLUSION: Initial results after introduction of EPISCISSORS-60(®) show that the majority of health care professionals achieve post-suturing episiotomy angles between 40° and 60°. The results also show a significant increase in the use of episiotomies in the delivery of nulliparous women. There has been a statistically significant reduction in OASIS in nulliparous spontaneous vaginal deliveries.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4677767
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46777672015-12-16 Comparison of obstetric anal sphincter injuries in nulliparous women before and after introduction of the EPISCISSORS-60(®) at two hospitals in the United Kingdom van Roon, Yves Kirwin, Ciara Rahman, Nadia Vinayakarao, Latha Melson, Louise Kester, Nikki Pathak, Sangeeta Pradhan, Ashish Int J Womens Health Original Research AIM: To assess whether the introduction of episiotomy scissors specially designed to achieve a cutting angle of 60°, EPISCISSORS-60(®), in two hospitals in the UK would result in a reduction in obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) in nulliparous women. METHODS: A structured training program for all doctors and midwives provided a theoretical framework around OASIS including risk factors and the role of episiotomies and a practical hands-on training element to use EPISCISSORS-60(®) correctly and to measure perineal body length and post-suturing angles. Data for perineal body length, post-suturing angles, user feedback, episiotomy use, and incidence of OASIS were collected through specifically designed forms and the general hospital data collection system. RESULTS: Data were available for 838 nulliparous vaginal deliveries. Mean perineal body length was 37 mm in spontaneous vaginal delivery group (standard deviation [SD] =8.3, 95% confidence interval [CI] =34–39) and 38 mm in the operative vaginal delivery group (SD=8, 95% CI=35–40). Post-suturing episiotomy angles were 53° (SD=6.5, 95% CI=50.7–55.8) in spontaneous vaginal deliveries and 52° (SD=9.6, 95% CI=49–54) in operative vaginal deliveries. EPISCISSORS-60(®) were rated as “good” to “very good” by 84% of users. There was a 47% increase in the number of episiotomies in nulliparous spontaneous vaginal deliveries at Poole (P=0.007) and a 16.5% increase in the number of episiotomies in nulliparous operative vaginal deliveries in Hinchingbrooke (P=0.003). There was an overall 11% increase in episiotomy numbers in nulliparous vaginal deliveries (P=0.08). There was a statistically significant OASIS reduction of 84% in nulliparous spontaneous vaginal deliveries in women who received an episiotomy (P=0.003). CONCLUSION: Initial results after introduction of EPISCISSORS-60(®) show that the majority of health care professionals achieve post-suturing episiotomy angles between 40° and 60°. The results also show a significant increase in the use of episiotomies in the delivery of nulliparous women. There has been a statistically significant reduction in OASIS in nulliparous spontaneous vaginal deliveries. Dove Medical Press 2015-12-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4677767/ /pubmed/26677344 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJWH.S94680 Text en © 2015 van Roon et al. This work is published by Dove Medical Press Limited, and licensed under Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License The full terms of the License are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
van Roon, Yves
Kirwin, Ciara
Rahman, Nadia
Vinayakarao, Latha
Melson, Louise
Kester, Nikki
Pathak, Sangeeta
Pradhan, Ashish
Comparison of obstetric anal sphincter injuries in nulliparous women before and after introduction of the EPISCISSORS-60(®) at two hospitals in the United Kingdom
title Comparison of obstetric anal sphincter injuries in nulliparous women before and after introduction of the EPISCISSORS-60(®) at two hospitals in the United Kingdom
title_full Comparison of obstetric anal sphincter injuries in nulliparous women before and after introduction of the EPISCISSORS-60(®) at two hospitals in the United Kingdom
title_fullStr Comparison of obstetric anal sphincter injuries in nulliparous women before and after introduction of the EPISCISSORS-60(®) at two hospitals in the United Kingdom
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of obstetric anal sphincter injuries in nulliparous women before and after introduction of the EPISCISSORS-60(®) at two hospitals in the United Kingdom
title_short Comparison of obstetric anal sphincter injuries in nulliparous women before and after introduction of the EPISCISSORS-60(®) at two hospitals in the United Kingdom
title_sort comparison of obstetric anal sphincter injuries in nulliparous women before and after introduction of the episcissors-60(®) at two hospitals in the united kingdom
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4677767/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26677344
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJWH.S94680
work_keys_str_mv AT vanroonyves comparisonofobstetricanalsphincterinjuriesinnulliparouswomenbeforeandafterintroductionoftheepiscissors60attwohospitalsintheunitedkingdom
AT kirwinciara comparisonofobstetricanalsphincterinjuriesinnulliparouswomenbeforeandafterintroductionoftheepiscissors60attwohospitalsintheunitedkingdom
AT rahmannadia comparisonofobstetricanalsphincterinjuriesinnulliparouswomenbeforeandafterintroductionoftheepiscissors60attwohospitalsintheunitedkingdom
AT vinayakaraolatha comparisonofobstetricanalsphincterinjuriesinnulliparouswomenbeforeandafterintroductionoftheepiscissors60attwohospitalsintheunitedkingdom
AT melsonlouise comparisonofobstetricanalsphincterinjuriesinnulliparouswomenbeforeandafterintroductionoftheepiscissors60attwohospitalsintheunitedkingdom
AT kesternikki comparisonofobstetricanalsphincterinjuriesinnulliparouswomenbeforeandafterintroductionoftheepiscissors60attwohospitalsintheunitedkingdom
AT pathaksangeeta comparisonofobstetricanalsphincterinjuriesinnulliparouswomenbeforeandafterintroductionoftheepiscissors60attwohospitalsintheunitedkingdom
AT pradhanashish comparisonofobstetricanalsphincterinjuriesinnulliparouswomenbeforeandafterintroductionoftheepiscissors60attwohospitalsintheunitedkingdom