Cargando…

Breast Volume Asymmetry Value, Ratio, and Cancer Risk

AIM: The aim of this study was to investigate the criteria for determining the cancer risk of the breast asymmetry by comparing breast volume asymmetry levels between healthy women and women with cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two hundred and one women with breast cancer (group 1) were compared with...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kayar, Ragıp, Çilengiroğlu, Özgül V.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Libertas Academica 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4677797/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26691819
http://dx.doi.org/10.4137/BCBCR.S32789
_version_ 1782405372249636864
author Kayar, Ragıp
Çilengiroğlu, Özgül V.
author_facet Kayar, Ragıp
Çilengiroğlu, Özgül V.
author_sort Kayar, Ragıp
collection PubMed
description AIM: The aim of this study was to investigate the criteria for determining the cancer risk of the breast asymmetry by comparing breast volume asymmetry levels between healthy women and women with cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two hundred and one women with breast cancer (group 1) were compared with 446 healthy women (group 2) who had no pathologic findings in breast sonography and mammograpy repeated with one-year interval. Data were evaluated retrospectively. Each breast volume was measured twice by Grossman-Roudner Discs. The mean value has been recorded. The amounts of volume difference between two breasts (asymmetry value) and the rates of the volume difference to the breast volume of the smaller side (asymmetry ratio) were compared in both groups. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant difference between two groups with regard to average age and body mass index (P < 0.01). This significance was decreased but not disappeared, when the comparison was made within the 40–69 age group (P > 0.01). The rate of cases with asymmetry value over 50 mL was significantly higher in the cancer group (P = 0.029). Unfortunately, it disappeared in the 40–69 age group (P = 0.201). The breast volume asymmetry ratio over 20% was significantly higher in the cancer group both in all ages and in the 40–69 age group (P < 0.01). Odds ratio was 2.18 in the entire (all) series and 2.01 in the 40–69 age group. Moreover, there was no significant difference with regard to the rate of tumor location between the smaller or larger side of breast. CONCLUSION: Our data show that there is a positive correlation between breast asymmetry ratio over 20% and breast cancer risk. These results need to be confirmed by prospective randomized controlled trials.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4677797
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Libertas Academica
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46777972015-12-19 Breast Volume Asymmetry Value, Ratio, and Cancer Risk Kayar, Ragıp Çilengiroğlu, Özgül V. Breast Cancer (Auckl) Original Research AIM: The aim of this study was to investigate the criteria for determining the cancer risk of the breast asymmetry by comparing breast volume asymmetry levels between healthy women and women with cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two hundred and one women with breast cancer (group 1) were compared with 446 healthy women (group 2) who had no pathologic findings in breast sonography and mammograpy repeated with one-year interval. Data were evaluated retrospectively. Each breast volume was measured twice by Grossman-Roudner Discs. The mean value has been recorded. The amounts of volume difference between two breasts (asymmetry value) and the rates of the volume difference to the breast volume of the smaller side (asymmetry ratio) were compared in both groups. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant difference between two groups with regard to average age and body mass index (P < 0.01). This significance was decreased but not disappeared, when the comparison was made within the 40–69 age group (P > 0.01). The rate of cases with asymmetry value over 50 mL was significantly higher in the cancer group (P = 0.029). Unfortunately, it disappeared in the 40–69 age group (P = 0.201). The breast volume asymmetry ratio over 20% was significantly higher in the cancer group both in all ages and in the 40–69 age group (P < 0.01). Odds ratio was 2.18 in the entire (all) series and 2.01 in the 40–69 age group. Moreover, there was no significant difference with regard to the rate of tumor location between the smaller or larger side of breast. CONCLUSION: Our data show that there is a positive correlation between breast asymmetry ratio over 20% and breast cancer risk. These results need to be confirmed by prospective randomized controlled trials. Libertas Academica 2015-12-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4677797/ /pubmed/26691819 http://dx.doi.org/10.4137/BCBCR.S32789 Text en © 2015 the author(s), publisher and licensee Libertas Academica Ltd. This is an open access article published under the Creative Commons CC-BY-NC 3.0 license.
spellingShingle Original Research
Kayar, Ragıp
Çilengiroğlu, Özgül V.
Breast Volume Asymmetry Value, Ratio, and Cancer Risk
title Breast Volume Asymmetry Value, Ratio, and Cancer Risk
title_full Breast Volume Asymmetry Value, Ratio, and Cancer Risk
title_fullStr Breast Volume Asymmetry Value, Ratio, and Cancer Risk
title_full_unstemmed Breast Volume Asymmetry Value, Ratio, and Cancer Risk
title_short Breast Volume Asymmetry Value, Ratio, and Cancer Risk
title_sort breast volume asymmetry value, ratio, and cancer risk
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4677797/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26691819
http://dx.doi.org/10.4137/BCBCR.S32789
work_keys_str_mv AT kayarragıp breastvolumeasymmetryvalueratioandcancerrisk
AT cilengirogluozgulv breastvolumeasymmetryvalueratioandcancerrisk