Cargando…
Distinguishing Target From Distractor in Stroop, Picture–Word, and Word–Word Interference Tasks
Lexical selection—both during reading aloud and speech production—involves selecting an intended word, while ignoring irrelevant lexical activation. This process has been studied by the use of interference tasks. Examples are the Stroop task, where participants ignore the written color word and name...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4678191/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26696927 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01858 |
_version_ | 1782405411165437952 |
---|---|
author | Schmalz, Xenia Treccani, Barbara Mulatti, Claudio |
author_facet | Schmalz, Xenia Treccani, Barbara Mulatti, Claudio |
author_sort | Schmalz, Xenia |
collection | PubMed |
description | Lexical selection—both during reading aloud and speech production—involves selecting an intended word, while ignoring irrelevant lexical activation. This process has been studied by the use of interference tasks. Examples are the Stroop task, where participants ignore the written color word and name the color of the ink, picture–word interference tasks, where participants name a picture while ignoring a super-imposed written word, or word–word interference (WWI) tasks, where two words are presented and the participants need to respond to only one, based on an pre-determined visual feature (e.g., color, position). Here, we focus on the WWI task: it is theoretically impossible for existing models to explain how the cognitive system can respond to one stimulus and block the other, when they are presented by the same modality (i.e., they are both words). We describe a solution that can explain performance on the WWI task: drawing on the literature on visual attention, we propose that the system creates an object file for each perceived object, which is continuously updated with increasingly complete information about the stimulus, such as the task-relevant visual feature. Such a model can account for performance on all three tasks. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4678191 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46781912015-12-22 Distinguishing Target From Distractor in Stroop, Picture–Word, and Word–Word Interference Tasks Schmalz, Xenia Treccani, Barbara Mulatti, Claudio Front Psychol Psychology Lexical selection—both during reading aloud and speech production—involves selecting an intended word, while ignoring irrelevant lexical activation. This process has been studied by the use of interference tasks. Examples are the Stroop task, where participants ignore the written color word and name the color of the ink, picture–word interference tasks, where participants name a picture while ignoring a super-imposed written word, or word–word interference (WWI) tasks, where two words are presented and the participants need to respond to only one, based on an pre-determined visual feature (e.g., color, position). Here, we focus on the WWI task: it is theoretically impossible for existing models to explain how the cognitive system can respond to one stimulus and block the other, when they are presented by the same modality (i.e., they are both words). We describe a solution that can explain performance on the WWI task: drawing on the literature on visual attention, we propose that the system creates an object file for each perceived object, which is continuously updated with increasingly complete information about the stimulus, such as the task-relevant visual feature. Such a model can account for performance on all three tasks. Frontiers Media S.A. 2015-12-15 /pmc/articles/PMC4678191/ /pubmed/26696927 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01858 Text en Copyright © 2015 Schmalz, Treccani and Mulatti. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Schmalz, Xenia Treccani, Barbara Mulatti, Claudio Distinguishing Target From Distractor in Stroop, Picture–Word, and Word–Word Interference Tasks |
title | Distinguishing Target From Distractor in Stroop, Picture–Word, and Word–Word Interference Tasks |
title_full | Distinguishing Target From Distractor in Stroop, Picture–Word, and Word–Word Interference Tasks |
title_fullStr | Distinguishing Target From Distractor in Stroop, Picture–Word, and Word–Word Interference Tasks |
title_full_unstemmed | Distinguishing Target From Distractor in Stroop, Picture–Word, and Word–Word Interference Tasks |
title_short | Distinguishing Target From Distractor in Stroop, Picture–Word, and Word–Word Interference Tasks |
title_sort | distinguishing target from distractor in stroop, picture–word, and word–word interference tasks |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4678191/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26696927 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01858 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schmalzxenia distinguishingtargetfromdistractorinstrooppicturewordandwordwordinterferencetasks AT treccanibarbara distinguishingtargetfromdistractorinstrooppicturewordandwordwordinterferencetasks AT mulatticlaudio distinguishingtargetfromdistractorinstrooppicturewordandwordwordinterferencetasks |