Cargando…
Listeners Exploit Syntactic Structure On-Line to Restrict Their Lexical Search to a Subclass of Verbs
Many experiments have shown that listeners actively build expectations about up-coming words, rather than simply waiting for information to accumulate. The online construction of a syntactic structure is one of the cues that listeners may use to construct strong expectations about the possible words...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4678230/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26696917 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01841 |
_version_ | 1782405420111888384 |
---|---|
author | Brusini, Perrine Brun, Mélanie Brunet, Isabelle Christophe, Anne |
author_facet | Brusini, Perrine Brun, Mélanie Brunet, Isabelle Christophe, Anne |
author_sort | Brusini, Perrine |
collection | PubMed |
description | Many experiments have shown that listeners actively build expectations about up-coming words, rather than simply waiting for information to accumulate. The online construction of a syntactic structure is one of the cues that listeners may use to construct strong expectations about the possible words they will be exposed to. For example, speakers of verb-final languages use pre-verbal arguments to predict on-line the kind of arguments that are likely to occur next (e.g., Kamide, 2008, for a review). Although in SVO languages information about a verb's arguments typically follows the verb, some languages use pre-verbal object pronouns, potentially allowing listeners to build on-line expectations about the nature of the upcoming verb. For instance, if a pre-verbal direct object pronoun is heard, then the following verb has to be able to enter a transitive structure, thus excluding intransitive verbs. To test this, we used French, in which object pronouns have to appear pre-verbally, to investigate whether listeners use this cue to predict the occurrence of a transitive verb. In a word detection task, we measured the number of false alarms to sentences that contained a transitive verb whose first syllable was homophonous to the target monosyllabic verb (e.g., target “dort” /dɔʁ/ to sleep and false alarm verb “dorlote” /dɔʁlɔt/ to cuddle). The crucial comparison involved two sentence types, one without a pre-verbal object clitic, for which an intransitive verb was temporarily a plausible option (e.g., “Il dorlote” / He cuddles) and the other with a pre-verbal object clitic, that made the appearance of an intransitive verb impossible (“Il le dorlote” / He cuddles it). Results showed a lower rate of false alarms for sentences with a pre-verbal object pronoun (3%) compared to locally ambiguous sentences (about 20%). Participants rapidly incorporate information about a verb's argument structure to constrain lexical access to verbs that match the expected subcategorization frame. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4678230 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46782302015-12-22 Listeners Exploit Syntactic Structure On-Line to Restrict Their Lexical Search to a Subclass of Verbs Brusini, Perrine Brun, Mélanie Brunet, Isabelle Christophe, Anne Front Psychol Psychology Many experiments have shown that listeners actively build expectations about up-coming words, rather than simply waiting for information to accumulate. The online construction of a syntactic structure is one of the cues that listeners may use to construct strong expectations about the possible words they will be exposed to. For example, speakers of verb-final languages use pre-verbal arguments to predict on-line the kind of arguments that are likely to occur next (e.g., Kamide, 2008, for a review). Although in SVO languages information about a verb's arguments typically follows the verb, some languages use pre-verbal object pronouns, potentially allowing listeners to build on-line expectations about the nature of the upcoming verb. For instance, if a pre-verbal direct object pronoun is heard, then the following verb has to be able to enter a transitive structure, thus excluding intransitive verbs. To test this, we used French, in which object pronouns have to appear pre-verbally, to investigate whether listeners use this cue to predict the occurrence of a transitive verb. In a word detection task, we measured the number of false alarms to sentences that contained a transitive verb whose first syllable was homophonous to the target monosyllabic verb (e.g., target “dort” /dɔʁ/ to sleep and false alarm verb “dorlote” /dɔʁlɔt/ to cuddle). The crucial comparison involved two sentence types, one without a pre-verbal object clitic, for which an intransitive verb was temporarily a plausible option (e.g., “Il dorlote” / He cuddles) and the other with a pre-verbal object clitic, that made the appearance of an intransitive verb impossible (“Il le dorlote” / He cuddles it). Results showed a lower rate of false alarms for sentences with a pre-verbal object pronoun (3%) compared to locally ambiguous sentences (about 20%). Participants rapidly incorporate information about a verb's argument structure to constrain lexical access to verbs that match the expected subcategorization frame. Frontiers Media S.A. 2015-12-15 /pmc/articles/PMC4678230/ /pubmed/26696917 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01841 Text en Copyright © 2015 Brusini, Brun, Brunet and Christophe. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Brusini, Perrine Brun, Mélanie Brunet, Isabelle Christophe, Anne Listeners Exploit Syntactic Structure On-Line to Restrict Their Lexical Search to a Subclass of Verbs |
title | Listeners Exploit Syntactic Structure On-Line to Restrict Their Lexical Search to a Subclass of Verbs |
title_full | Listeners Exploit Syntactic Structure On-Line to Restrict Their Lexical Search to a Subclass of Verbs |
title_fullStr | Listeners Exploit Syntactic Structure On-Line to Restrict Their Lexical Search to a Subclass of Verbs |
title_full_unstemmed | Listeners Exploit Syntactic Structure On-Line to Restrict Their Lexical Search to a Subclass of Verbs |
title_short | Listeners Exploit Syntactic Structure On-Line to Restrict Their Lexical Search to a Subclass of Verbs |
title_sort | listeners exploit syntactic structure on-line to restrict their lexical search to a subclass of verbs |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4678230/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26696917 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01841 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT brusiniperrine listenersexploitsyntacticstructureonlinetorestricttheirlexicalsearchtoasubclassofverbs AT brunmelanie listenersexploitsyntacticstructureonlinetorestricttheirlexicalsearchtoasubclassofverbs AT brunetisabelle listenersexploitsyntacticstructureonlinetorestricttheirlexicalsearchtoasubclassofverbs AT christopheanne listenersexploitsyntacticstructureonlinetorestricttheirlexicalsearchtoasubclassofverbs |