Cargando…
Validation of the STOP-Bang Questionnaire as a Screening Tool for Obstructive Sleep Apnea among Different Populations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND: Diagnosing obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is clinically relevant because untreated OSA has been associated with increased morbidity and mortality. The STOP-Bang questionnaire is a validated screening tool for OSA. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the effecti...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4678295/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26658438 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143697 |
_version_ | 1782405429724184576 |
---|---|
author | Nagappa, Mahesh Liao, Pu Wong, Jean Auckley, Dennis Ramachandran, Satya Krishna Memtsoudis, Stavros Mokhlesi, Babak Chung, Frances |
author_facet | Nagappa, Mahesh Liao, Pu Wong, Jean Auckley, Dennis Ramachandran, Satya Krishna Memtsoudis, Stavros Mokhlesi, Babak Chung, Frances |
author_sort | Nagappa, Mahesh |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Diagnosing obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is clinically relevant because untreated OSA has been associated with increased morbidity and mortality. The STOP-Bang questionnaire is a validated screening tool for OSA. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the effectiveness of STOP-Bang for screening patients suspected of having OSA and to predict its accuracy in determining the severity of OSA in the different populations. METHODS: A search of the literature databases was performed. Inclusion criteria were: 1) Studies that used STOP-Bang questionnaire as a screening tool for OSA in adult subjects (>18 years); 2) The accuracy of the STOP-Bang questionnaire was validated by polysomnography—the gold standard for diagnosing OSA; 3) OSA was clearly defined as apnea/hypopnea index (AHI) or respiratory disturbance index (RDI) ≥ 5; 4) Publications in the English language. The quality of the studies were explicitly described and coded according to the Cochrane Methods group on the screening and diagnostic tests. RESULTS: Seventeen studies including 9,206 patients met criteria for the systematic review. In the sleep clinic population, the sensitivity was 90%, 94% and 96% to detect any OSA (AHI ≥ 5), moderate-to-severe OSA (AHI ≥15), and severe OSA (AHI ≥30) respectively. The corresponding NPV was 46%, 75% and 90%. A similar trend was found in the surgical population. In the sleep clinic population, the probability of severe OSA with a STOP-Bang score of 3 was 25%. With a stepwise increase of the STOP-Bang score to 4, 5, 6 and 7/8, the probability rose proportionally to 35%, 45%, 55% and 75%, respectively. In the surgical population, the probability of severe OSA with a STOP-Bang score of 3 was 15%. With a stepwise increase of the STOP-Bang score to 4, 5, 6 and 7/8, the probability increased to 25%, 35%, 45% and 65%, respectively. CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis confirms the high performance of the STOP-Bang questionnaire in the sleep clinic and surgical population for screening of OSA. The higher the STOP-Bang score, the greater is the probability of moderate-to-severe OSA. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4678295 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46782952015-12-31 Validation of the STOP-Bang Questionnaire as a Screening Tool for Obstructive Sleep Apnea among Different Populations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Nagappa, Mahesh Liao, Pu Wong, Jean Auckley, Dennis Ramachandran, Satya Krishna Memtsoudis, Stavros Mokhlesi, Babak Chung, Frances PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Diagnosing obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is clinically relevant because untreated OSA has been associated with increased morbidity and mortality. The STOP-Bang questionnaire is a validated screening tool for OSA. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the effectiveness of STOP-Bang for screening patients suspected of having OSA and to predict its accuracy in determining the severity of OSA in the different populations. METHODS: A search of the literature databases was performed. Inclusion criteria were: 1) Studies that used STOP-Bang questionnaire as a screening tool for OSA in adult subjects (>18 years); 2) The accuracy of the STOP-Bang questionnaire was validated by polysomnography—the gold standard for diagnosing OSA; 3) OSA was clearly defined as apnea/hypopnea index (AHI) or respiratory disturbance index (RDI) ≥ 5; 4) Publications in the English language. The quality of the studies were explicitly described and coded according to the Cochrane Methods group on the screening and diagnostic tests. RESULTS: Seventeen studies including 9,206 patients met criteria for the systematic review. In the sleep clinic population, the sensitivity was 90%, 94% and 96% to detect any OSA (AHI ≥ 5), moderate-to-severe OSA (AHI ≥15), and severe OSA (AHI ≥30) respectively. The corresponding NPV was 46%, 75% and 90%. A similar trend was found in the surgical population. In the sleep clinic population, the probability of severe OSA with a STOP-Bang score of 3 was 25%. With a stepwise increase of the STOP-Bang score to 4, 5, 6 and 7/8, the probability rose proportionally to 35%, 45%, 55% and 75%, respectively. In the surgical population, the probability of severe OSA with a STOP-Bang score of 3 was 15%. With a stepwise increase of the STOP-Bang score to 4, 5, 6 and 7/8, the probability increased to 25%, 35%, 45% and 65%, respectively. CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis confirms the high performance of the STOP-Bang questionnaire in the sleep clinic and surgical population for screening of OSA. The higher the STOP-Bang score, the greater is the probability of moderate-to-severe OSA. Public Library of Science 2015-12-14 /pmc/articles/PMC4678295/ /pubmed/26658438 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143697 Text en https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Public Domain declaration, which stipulates that, once placed in the public domain, this work may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Nagappa, Mahesh Liao, Pu Wong, Jean Auckley, Dennis Ramachandran, Satya Krishna Memtsoudis, Stavros Mokhlesi, Babak Chung, Frances Validation of the STOP-Bang Questionnaire as a Screening Tool for Obstructive Sleep Apnea among Different Populations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title | Validation of the STOP-Bang Questionnaire as a Screening Tool for Obstructive Sleep Apnea among Different Populations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full | Validation of the STOP-Bang Questionnaire as a Screening Tool for Obstructive Sleep Apnea among Different Populations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_fullStr | Validation of the STOP-Bang Questionnaire as a Screening Tool for Obstructive Sleep Apnea among Different Populations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Validation of the STOP-Bang Questionnaire as a Screening Tool for Obstructive Sleep Apnea among Different Populations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_short | Validation of the STOP-Bang Questionnaire as a Screening Tool for Obstructive Sleep Apnea among Different Populations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_sort | validation of the stop-bang questionnaire as a screening tool for obstructive sleep apnea among different populations: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4678295/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26658438 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143697 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nagappamahesh validationofthestopbangquestionnaireasascreeningtoolforobstructivesleepapneaamongdifferentpopulationsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT liaopu validationofthestopbangquestionnaireasascreeningtoolforobstructivesleepapneaamongdifferentpopulationsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT wongjean validationofthestopbangquestionnaireasascreeningtoolforobstructivesleepapneaamongdifferentpopulationsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT auckleydennis validationofthestopbangquestionnaireasascreeningtoolforobstructivesleepapneaamongdifferentpopulationsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT ramachandransatyakrishna validationofthestopbangquestionnaireasascreeningtoolforobstructivesleepapneaamongdifferentpopulationsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT memtsoudisstavros validationofthestopbangquestionnaireasascreeningtoolforobstructivesleepapneaamongdifferentpopulationsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT mokhlesibabak validationofthestopbangquestionnaireasascreeningtoolforobstructivesleepapneaamongdifferentpopulationsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT chungfrances validationofthestopbangquestionnaireasascreeningtoolforobstructivesleepapneaamongdifferentpopulationsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |