Cargando…

Visuomotor Correction is a Robust Contributor to Force Variability During Index Finger Abduction by Older Adults

We examined aging-related differences in the contribution of visuomotor correction to force fluctuations during index finger abduction via the analysis of two datasets from similar subjects. Study (1) Young (N = 27, 23 ± 8 years) and older adults (N = 14, 72 ± 9 years) underwent assessment of maximu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tracy, Brian L., Hitchcock, Leah N., Welsh, Seth J., Paxton, Roger J., Feldman-Kothe, Caitlin E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4678381/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26696881
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2015.00229
_version_ 1782405439051268096
author Tracy, Brian L.
Hitchcock, Leah N.
Welsh, Seth J.
Paxton, Roger J.
Feldman-Kothe, Caitlin E.
author_facet Tracy, Brian L.
Hitchcock, Leah N.
Welsh, Seth J.
Paxton, Roger J.
Feldman-Kothe, Caitlin E.
author_sort Tracy, Brian L.
collection PubMed
description We examined aging-related differences in the contribution of visuomotor correction to force fluctuations during index finger abduction via the analysis of two datasets from similar subjects. Study (1) Young (N = 27, 23 ± 8 years) and older adults (N = 14, 72 ± 9 years) underwent assessment of maximum voluntary contraction force (MVC) and force steadiness during constant-force (CF) index finger abduction (2.5, 30, 65% MVC). For each trial, visual feedback of the force (VIS) was provided for 8–10 s and removed for 8–10 s (NOVIS). Visual gain of the force feedback at 2.5% MVC was high; 12- and 26-fold greater than the 30 and 65% MVC targets. Mean force, standard deviation (SD) of force, and coefficient of variation (CV) of force was calculated for detrended (<0.5 Hz drift removed) VIS and NOVIS data segments. Study (2) A similar group of 14 older adults performed discrete, randomly-ordered VIS or NOVIS trials at low target forces (1–3% MVC) and high visual gain. Study (1) For young adults the CV of force was similar between VIS and NOVIS for the 2.5% (4.8 vs. 4.3%), 30% (3.2 vs. 3.2%) and 65% (3.5 vs. 4.2%) target forces. In contrast, for older adults the CV of force was greater for VIS than NOVIS for 2.5% MVC (6.6 vs. 4.2%, p < 0.001), but not for the 30% (2.4 vs. 2.4%) and 65% (3.1 vs. 3.3%) target forces. At 2.5% MVC, the increase in CV of force for VIS compared with NOVIS was significantly greater (age × visual condition p = 0.008) for older than young adults. Study (2) Similarly, for older adults performing discrete, randomly ordered trials the CV of force was greater for VIS than NOVIS (6.04 vs. 3.81%, p = 0.01). When visual force feedback was a dominant source of information at low forces, normalized force variability was ~58% greater for older adults, but only 11% greater for young adults. The significant effect of visual feedback for older adults was not dependent on the order of presentation of visual conditions. The results indicate that impaired processing of visuomotor information underlies the greater motor variability observed in older adults during lab-based isometric contractions of a hand muscle.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4678381
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46783812015-12-22 Visuomotor Correction is a Robust Contributor to Force Variability During Index Finger Abduction by Older Adults Tracy, Brian L. Hitchcock, Leah N. Welsh, Seth J. Paxton, Roger J. Feldman-Kothe, Caitlin E. Front Aging Neurosci Neuroscience We examined aging-related differences in the contribution of visuomotor correction to force fluctuations during index finger abduction via the analysis of two datasets from similar subjects. Study (1) Young (N = 27, 23 ± 8 years) and older adults (N = 14, 72 ± 9 years) underwent assessment of maximum voluntary contraction force (MVC) and force steadiness during constant-force (CF) index finger abduction (2.5, 30, 65% MVC). For each trial, visual feedback of the force (VIS) was provided for 8–10 s and removed for 8–10 s (NOVIS). Visual gain of the force feedback at 2.5% MVC was high; 12- and 26-fold greater than the 30 and 65% MVC targets. Mean force, standard deviation (SD) of force, and coefficient of variation (CV) of force was calculated for detrended (<0.5 Hz drift removed) VIS and NOVIS data segments. Study (2) A similar group of 14 older adults performed discrete, randomly-ordered VIS or NOVIS trials at low target forces (1–3% MVC) and high visual gain. Study (1) For young adults the CV of force was similar between VIS and NOVIS for the 2.5% (4.8 vs. 4.3%), 30% (3.2 vs. 3.2%) and 65% (3.5 vs. 4.2%) target forces. In contrast, for older adults the CV of force was greater for VIS than NOVIS for 2.5% MVC (6.6 vs. 4.2%, p < 0.001), but not for the 30% (2.4 vs. 2.4%) and 65% (3.1 vs. 3.3%) target forces. At 2.5% MVC, the increase in CV of force for VIS compared with NOVIS was significantly greater (age × visual condition p = 0.008) for older than young adults. Study (2) Similarly, for older adults performing discrete, randomly ordered trials the CV of force was greater for VIS than NOVIS (6.04 vs. 3.81%, p = 0.01). When visual force feedback was a dominant source of information at low forces, normalized force variability was ~58% greater for older adults, but only 11% greater for young adults. The significant effect of visual feedback for older adults was not dependent on the order of presentation of visual conditions. The results indicate that impaired processing of visuomotor information underlies the greater motor variability observed in older adults during lab-based isometric contractions of a hand muscle. Frontiers Media S.A. 2015-12-15 /pmc/articles/PMC4678381/ /pubmed/26696881 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2015.00229 Text en Copyright © 2015 Tracy, Hitchcock, Welsh, Paxton and Feldman-Kothe. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution and reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Tracy, Brian L.
Hitchcock, Leah N.
Welsh, Seth J.
Paxton, Roger J.
Feldman-Kothe, Caitlin E.
Visuomotor Correction is a Robust Contributor to Force Variability During Index Finger Abduction by Older Adults
title Visuomotor Correction is a Robust Contributor to Force Variability During Index Finger Abduction by Older Adults
title_full Visuomotor Correction is a Robust Contributor to Force Variability During Index Finger Abduction by Older Adults
title_fullStr Visuomotor Correction is a Robust Contributor to Force Variability During Index Finger Abduction by Older Adults
title_full_unstemmed Visuomotor Correction is a Robust Contributor to Force Variability During Index Finger Abduction by Older Adults
title_short Visuomotor Correction is a Robust Contributor to Force Variability During Index Finger Abduction by Older Adults
title_sort visuomotor correction is a robust contributor to force variability during index finger abduction by older adults
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4678381/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26696881
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2015.00229
work_keys_str_mv AT tracybrianl visuomotorcorrectionisarobustcontributortoforcevariabilityduringindexfingerabductionbyolderadults
AT hitchcockleahn visuomotorcorrectionisarobustcontributortoforcevariabilityduringindexfingerabductionbyolderadults
AT welshsethj visuomotorcorrectionisarobustcontributortoforcevariabilityduringindexfingerabductionbyolderadults
AT paxtonrogerj visuomotorcorrectionisarobustcontributortoforcevariabilityduringindexfingerabductionbyolderadults
AT feldmankothecaitline visuomotorcorrectionisarobustcontributortoforcevariabilityduringindexfingerabductionbyolderadults