Cargando…

Eight years’ experience with a Medical Education Journal Club in Mexico: a quasi-experimental one-group study

BACKGROUND: A time-honored strategy for keeping up to date in medicine and improving critical appraisal skills is the Journal Club (JC). There are several reports of its use in medicine and allied health sciences but almost no reports of JC focused on medical education. The purpose of the study is t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sánchez-Mendiola, Melchor, Morales-Castillo, Daniel, Torruco-García, Uri, Varela-Ruiz, Margarita
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4678520/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26667394
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-015-0499-7
_version_ 1782405456722919424
author Sánchez-Mendiola, Melchor
Morales-Castillo, Daniel
Torruco-García, Uri
Varela-Ruiz, Margarita
author_facet Sánchez-Mendiola, Melchor
Morales-Castillo, Daniel
Torruco-García, Uri
Varela-Ruiz, Margarita
author_sort Sánchez-Mendiola, Melchor
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A time-honored strategy for keeping up to date in medicine and improving critical appraisal skills is the Journal Club (JC). There are several reports of its use in medicine and allied health sciences but almost no reports of JC focused on medical education. The purpose of the study is to describe and evaluate an eight years’ experience with a medical education Journal Club (MEJC). METHODS: We started a monthly medical education JC in 2006 at UNAM Faculty of Medicine in Mexico City. Its goal is to provide faculty with continuing professional development in medical education. A discussion guide and a published paper were sent 2 weeks before sessions. We reviewed the themes and publication types of the papers used in the sessions, and in June-July 2014 administered a retrospective post-then-pre evaluation questionnaire to current participants that had been regular attendees to the JC for more than 2 years. The retrospective post-then-pre comparisons were analyzed with Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Effect sizes were calculated for the pre-post comparisons with Cohen’s r. RESULTS: There have been 94 MEJC sessions until July 2014. Average attendance is 20 persons, a mix of clinicians, educators, psychologists and a sociologist. The articles were published in 32 different journals, and covered several medical education themes (curriculum, faculty development, educational research methodology, learning methods, assessment, residency education). 22 Attendees answered the evaluation instrument. The MEJC had a positive evaluation from good to excellent, and there was an improvement in self-reported competencies in medical education literature critical appraisal and behaviors related to the use of evidence in educational practice, with a median effect size higher than 0.5. The evaluation instrument had a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.96. CONCLUSIONS: A periodic Medical Education Journal Club can improve critical appraisal of the literature, and be maintained long-term using evidence-based strategies. This activity is a useful adjunct to the scholarship of teaching.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4678520
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46785202015-12-16 Eight years’ experience with a Medical Education Journal Club in Mexico: a quasi-experimental one-group study Sánchez-Mendiola, Melchor Morales-Castillo, Daniel Torruco-García, Uri Varela-Ruiz, Margarita BMC Med Educ Research Article BACKGROUND: A time-honored strategy for keeping up to date in medicine and improving critical appraisal skills is the Journal Club (JC). There are several reports of its use in medicine and allied health sciences but almost no reports of JC focused on medical education. The purpose of the study is to describe and evaluate an eight years’ experience with a medical education Journal Club (MEJC). METHODS: We started a monthly medical education JC in 2006 at UNAM Faculty of Medicine in Mexico City. Its goal is to provide faculty with continuing professional development in medical education. A discussion guide and a published paper were sent 2 weeks before sessions. We reviewed the themes and publication types of the papers used in the sessions, and in June-July 2014 administered a retrospective post-then-pre evaluation questionnaire to current participants that had been regular attendees to the JC for more than 2 years. The retrospective post-then-pre comparisons were analyzed with Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Effect sizes were calculated for the pre-post comparisons with Cohen’s r. RESULTS: There have been 94 MEJC sessions until July 2014. Average attendance is 20 persons, a mix of clinicians, educators, psychologists and a sociologist. The articles were published in 32 different journals, and covered several medical education themes (curriculum, faculty development, educational research methodology, learning methods, assessment, residency education). 22 Attendees answered the evaluation instrument. The MEJC had a positive evaluation from good to excellent, and there was an improvement in self-reported competencies in medical education literature critical appraisal and behaviors related to the use of evidence in educational practice, with a median effect size higher than 0.5. The evaluation instrument had a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.96. CONCLUSIONS: A periodic Medical Education Journal Club can improve critical appraisal of the literature, and be maintained long-term using evidence-based strategies. This activity is a useful adjunct to the scholarship of teaching. BioMed Central 2015-12-14 /pmc/articles/PMC4678520/ /pubmed/26667394 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-015-0499-7 Text en © Sánchez-Mendiola et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Sánchez-Mendiola, Melchor
Morales-Castillo, Daniel
Torruco-García, Uri
Varela-Ruiz, Margarita
Eight years’ experience with a Medical Education Journal Club in Mexico: a quasi-experimental one-group study
title Eight years’ experience with a Medical Education Journal Club in Mexico: a quasi-experimental one-group study
title_full Eight years’ experience with a Medical Education Journal Club in Mexico: a quasi-experimental one-group study
title_fullStr Eight years’ experience with a Medical Education Journal Club in Mexico: a quasi-experimental one-group study
title_full_unstemmed Eight years’ experience with a Medical Education Journal Club in Mexico: a quasi-experimental one-group study
title_short Eight years’ experience with a Medical Education Journal Club in Mexico: a quasi-experimental one-group study
title_sort eight years’ experience with a medical education journal club in mexico: a quasi-experimental one-group study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4678520/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26667394
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-015-0499-7
work_keys_str_mv AT sanchezmendiolamelchor eightyearsexperiencewithamedicaleducationjournalclubinmexicoaquasiexperimentalonegroupstudy
AT moralescastillodaniel eightyearsexperiencewithamedicaleducationjournalclubinmexicoaquasiexperimentalonegroupstudy
AT torrucogarciauri eightyearsexperiencewithamedicaleducationjournalclubinmexicoaquasiexperimentalonegroupstudy
AT varelaruizmargarita eightyearsexperiencewithamedicaleducationjournalclubinmexicoaquasiexperimentalonegroupstudy