Cargando…

Acceptance of interventions to promote primary care: What do physicians prioritize?

BACKGROUND: Switzerland is facing a shortage of primary care physicians (PCPs); government organizations therefore suggested a broad variety of interventions to promote primary care. The aim of the study was to prioritize these interventions according to the acceptance and perceived barriers of most...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tandjung, Ryan, Djalali, Sima, Hasler, Susann, Scherz, Nathalie, Rosemann, Thomas, Markun, Stefan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4678628/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26666310
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-015-0397-4
_version_ 1782405475718922240
author Tandjung, Ryan
Djalali, Sima
Hasler, Susann
Scherz, Nathalie
Rosemann, Thomas
Markun, Stefan
author_facet Tandjung, Ryan
Djalali, Sima
Hasler, Susann
Scherz, Nathalie
Rosemann, Thomas
Markun, Stefan
author_sort Tandjung, Ryan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Switzerland is facing a shortage of primary care physicians (PCPs); government organizations therefore suggested a broad variety of interventions to promote primary care. The aim of the study was to prioritize these interventions according to the acceptance and perceived barriers of most relevant groups of physicians in this context (hospital physicians and PCPs). METHODS: The study was conducted during summer 2014. An online-based questionnaire assessed demographic data, working conditions and future plans. Participants were asked to rank the usefulness of 22 interventions to promote primary care. Interventions to promote primary care that received ratings of 4 or 5 on the Likert scale (corresponding to “useful” or “very useful”) by at least 80 % of the participants were categorized as interventions with very high acceptance. We analyzed whether the groups (PCPs, hospital physicians) ranked the interventions differently using the Mann–Whitney U test. We assumed a two tailed p < 0.05 after Bonferroni correction for multiple testing as statistically significant. RESULTS: Two hundred thirty physicians (response rate 58.4 %) completed the survey. Among those 69 PCPs and 66 hospital physicians were included in the analysis. Among those 14 PCPs were planning to leave clinical practice due to retirement, whereas only 8 hospital physicians planned a career as PCPs. Among PCPs the intervention with the highest acceptance was the increase of reimbursement, whereas family friendly measures achieved highest acceptance among hospital physicians. Financial support for primary care traineeships was considered to be very useful by both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Interventions on PCPs close to retirement or on PCPs considering an early retirement will not adequately prevent shortage of primary care providers. Governmental interventions should therefore also aim at encouraging hospital physicians to start a career in primary care by governmental support for traineeships in primary care and investments in family friendly measures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4678628
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46786282015-12-16 Acceptance of interventions to promote primary care: What do physicians prioritize? Tandjung, Ryan Djalali, Sima Hasler, Susann Scherz, Nathalie Rosemann, Thomas Markun, Stefan BMC Fam Pract Research Article BACKGROUND: Switzerland is facing a shortage of primary care physicians (PCPs); government organizations therefore suggested a broad variety of interventions to promote primary care. The aim of the study was to prioritize these interventions according to the acceptance and perceived barriers of most relevant groups of physicians in this context (hospital physicians and PCPs). METHODS: The study was conducted during summer 2014. An online-based questionnaire assessed demographic data, working conditions and future plans. Participants were asked to rank the usefulness of 22 interventions to promote primary care. Interventions to promote primary care that received ratings of 4 or 5 on the Likert scale (corresponding to “useful” or “very useful”) by at least 80 % of the participants were categorized as interventions with very high acceptance. We analyzed whether the groups (PCPs, hospital physicians) ranked the interventions differently using the Mann–Whitney U test. We assumed a two tailed p < 0.05 after Bonferroni correction for multiple testing as statistically significant. RESULTS: Two hundred thirty physicians (response rate 58.4 %) completed the survey. Among those 69 PCPs and 66 hospital physicians were included in the analysis. Among those 14 PCPs were planning to leave clinical practice due to retirement, whereas only 8 hospital physicians planned a career as PCPs. Among PCPs the intervention with the highest acceptance was the increase of reimbursement, whereas family friendly measures achieved highest acceptance among hospital physicians. Financial support for primary care traineeships was considered to be very useful by both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Interventions on PCPs close to retirement or on PCPs considering an early retirement will not adequately prevent shortage of primary care providers. Governmental interventions should therefore also aim at encouraging hospital physicians to start a career in primary care by governmental support for traineeships in primary care and investments in family friendly measures. BioMed Central 2015-12-15 /pmc/articles/PMC4678628/ /pubmed/26666310 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-015-0397-4 Text en © Tandjung et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Tandjung, Ryan
Djalali, Sima
Hasler, Susann
Scherz, Nathalie
Rosemann, Thomas
Markun, Stefan
Acceptance of interventions to promote primary care: What do physicians prioritize?
title Acceptance of interventions to promote primary care: What do physicians prioritize?
title_full Acceptance of interventions to promote primary care: What do physicians prioritize?
title_fullStr Acceptance of interventions to promote primary care: What do physicians prioritize?
title_full_unstemmed Acceptance of interventions to promote primary care: What do physicians prioritize?
title_short Acceptance of interventions to promote primary care: What do physicians prioritize?
title_sort acceptance of interventions to promote primary care: what do physicians prioritize?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4678628/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26666310
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-015-0397-4
work_keys_str_mv AT tandjungryan acceptanceofinterventionstopromoteprimarycarewhatdophysiciansprioritize
AT djalalisima acceptanceofinterventionstopromoteprimarycarewhatdophysiciansprioritize
AT haslersusann acceptanceofinterventionstopromoteprimarycarewhatdophysiciansprioritize
AT scherznathalie acceptanceofinterventionstopromoteprimarycarewhatdophysiciansprioritize
AT rosemannthomas acceptanceofinterventionstopromoteprimarycarewhatdophysiciansprioritize
AT markunstefan acceptanceofinterventionstopromoteprimarycarewhatdophysiciansprioritize