Cargando…

Shared Decision Making in mental health care using Routine Outcome Monitoring as a source of information: a cluster randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Shared Decision Making (SDM) is a way to empower patients when decisions are made about treatment. In order to be effective agents in this process, patients need access to information of good quality. Routine Outcome Monitoring (ROM) may provide such information and therefore may be a ke...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Metz, Margot J., Franx, Gerdien C., Veerbeek, Marjolein A., de Beurs, Edwin, van der Feltz-Cornelis, Christina M., Beekman, Aartjan T. F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4678650/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26666295
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-015-0696-2
_version_ 1782405480547614720
author Metz, Margot J.
Franx, Gerdien C.
Veerbeek, Marjolein A.
de Beurs, Edwin
van der Feltz-Cornelis, Christina M.
Beekman, Aartjan T. F.
author_facet Metz, Margot J.
Franx, Gerdien C.
Veerbeek, Marjolein A.
de Beurs, Edwin
van der Feltz-Cornelis, Christina M.
Beekman, Aartjan T. F.
author_sort Metz, Margot J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Shared Decision Making (SDM) is a way to empower patients when decisions are made about treatment. In order to be effective agents in this process, patients need access to information of good quality. Routine Outcome Monitoring (ROM) may provide such information and therefore may be a key element in SDM. This trial tests the effectiveness of SDM using ROM, primarily aiming to diminish decisional conflict of the patient while making decisions about treatment. The degree of decisional conflict, the primary outcome of this study, encompasses personal certainty about choosing an appropriate treatment, information about options, clarification of patient values, support from others and patients experience of an effective decision making process. Secondary outcomes of the study focus on the working alliance between patient and clinician, adherence to treatment, and clinical outcome and quality of life. METHODS/DESIGN: This article presents the study protocol of a multi-centre two-arm cluster randomised controlled trial (RCT). The research is conducted in Dutch specialised mental health care teams participating in the ROM Quality Improvement Collaborative (QIC), which aims to implement ROM in daily clinical practice. In the intervention teams, ROM is used as a source of information during the SDM process between the patient and clinician. Control teams receive no specific SDM or ROM instructions and apply decision making as usual. Randomisation is conducted at the level of the participating teams within the mental health organisations. A total of 12 teams from 4 organisations and 364 patients participate in the study. Prior to data collection, the intervention teams are trained to use ROM during the SDM process. Data collection will be at baseline, and at 3 and 6 months after inclusion of the patient. Control teams will implement the SDM and ROM model after completion of the study. DISCUSSION: This study will provide useful information about the effectiveness of ROM within a SDM framework. Furthermore, with practical guidelines this study may contribute to the implementation of SDM using ROM in mental health care. Reporting of the results is expected from December 2016 onwards. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Dutch trial register: TC5262 Trial registration date: 24th of June 2015
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4678650
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46786502015-12-16 Shared Decision Making in mental health care using Routine Outcome Monitoring as a source of information: a cluster randomised controlled trial Metz, Margot J. Franx, Gerdien C. Veerbeek, Marjolein A. de Beurs, Edwin van der Feltz-Cornelis, Christina M. Beekman, Aartjan T. F. BMC Psychiatry Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Shared Decision Making (SDM) is a way to empower patients when decisions are made about treatment. In order to be effective agents in this process, patients need access to information of good quality. Routine Outcome Monitoring (ROM) may provide such information and therefore may be a key element in SDM. This trial tests the effectiveness of SDM using ROM, primarily aiming to diminish decisional conflict of the patient while making decisions about treatment. The degree of decisional conflict, the primary outcome of this study, encompasses personal certainty about choosing an appropriate treatment, information about options, clarification of patient values, support from others and patients experience of an effective decision making process. Secondary outcomes of the study focus on the working alliance between patient and clinician, adherence to treatment, and clinical outcome and quality of life. METHODS/DESIGN: This article presents the study protocol of a multi-centre two-arm cluster randomised controlled trial (RCT). The research is conducted in Dutch specialised mental health care teams participating in the ROM Quality Improvement Collaborative (QIC), which aims to implement ROM in daily clinical practice. In the intervention teams, ROM is used as a source of information during the SDM process between the patient and clinician. Control teams receive no specific SDM or ROM instructions and apply decision making as usual. Randomisation is conducted at the level of the participating teams within the mental health organisations. A total of 12 teams from 4 organisations and 364 patients participate in the study. Prior to data collection, the intervention teams are trained to use ROM during the SDM process. Data collection will be at baseline, and at 3 and 6 months after inclusion of the patient. Control teams will implement the SDM and ROM model after completion of the study. DISCUSSION: This study will provide useful information about the effectiveness of ROM within a SDM framework. Furthermore, with practical guidelines this study may contribute to the implementation of SDM using ROM in mental health care. Reporting of the results is expected from December 2016 onwards. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Dutch trial register: TC5262 Trial registration date: 24th of June 2015 BioMed Central 2015-12-15 /pmc/articles/PMC4678650/ /pubmed/26666295 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-015-0696-2 Text en © Metz et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Metz, Margot J.
Franx, Gerdien C.
Veerbeek, Marjolein A.
de Beurs, Edwin
van der Feltz-Cornelis, Christina M.
Beekman, Aartjan T. F.
Shared Decision Making in mental health care using Routine Outcome Monitoring as a source of information: a cluster randomised controlled trial
title Shared Decision Making in mental health care using Routine Outcome Monitoring as a source of information: a cluster randomised controlled trial
title_full Shared Decision Making in mental health care using Routine Outcome Monitoring as a source of information: a cluster randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Shared Decision Making in mental health care using Routine Outcome Monitoring as a source of information: a cluster randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Shared Decision Making in mental health care using Routine Outcome Monitoring as a source of information: a cluster randomised controlled trial
title_short Shared Decision Making in mental health care using Routine Outcome Monitoring as a source of information: a cluster randomised controlled trial
title_sort shared decision making in mental health care using routine outcome monitoring as a source of information: a cluster randomised controlled trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4678650/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26666295
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-015-0696-2
work_keys_str_mv AT metzmargotj shareddecisionmakinginmentalhealthcareusingroutineoutcomemonitoringasasourceofinformationaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT franxgerdienc shareddecisionmakinginmentalhealthcareusingroutineoutcomemonitoringasasourceofinformationaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT veerbeekmarjoleina shareddecisionmakinginmentalhealthcareusingroutineoutcomemonitoringasasourceofinformationaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT debeursedwin shareddecisionmakinginmentalhealthcareusingroutineoutcomemonitoringasasourceofinformationaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT vanderfeltzcornelischristinam shareddecisionmakinginmentalhealthcareusingroutineoutcomemonitoringasasourceofinformationaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT beekmanaartjantf shareddecisionmakinginmentalhealthcareusingroutineoutcomemonitoringasasourceofinformationaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial