Cargando…
Methods that remove batch effects while retaining group differences may lead to exaggerated confidence in downstream analyses
Removal of, or adjustment for, batch effects or center differences is generally required when such effects are present in data. In particular, when preparing microarray gene expression data from multiple cohorts, array platforms, or batches for later analyses, batch effects can have confounding effe...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4679072/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26272994 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/biostatistics/kxv027 |
_version_ | 1782405541413257216 |
---|---|
author | Nygaard, Vegard Rødland, Einar Andreas Hovig, Eivind |
author_facet | Nygaard, Vegard Rødland, Einar Andreas Hovig, Eivind |
author_sort | Nygaard, Vegard |
collection | PubMed |
description | Removal of, or adjustment for, batch effects or center differences is generally required when such effects are present in data. In particular, when preparing microarray gene expression data from multiple cohorts, array platforms, or batches for later analyses, batch effects can have confounding effects, inducing spurious differences between study groups. Many methods and tools exist for removing batch effects from data. However, when study groups are not evenly distributed across batches, actual group differences may induce apparent batch differences, in which case batch adjustments may bias, usually deflate, group differences. Some tools therefore have the option of preserving the difference between study groups, e.g. using a two-way ANOVA model to simultaneously estimate both group and batch effects. Unfortunately, this approach may systematically induce incorrect group differences in downstream analyses when groups are distributed between the batches in an unbalanced manner. The scientific community seems to be largely unaware of how this approach may lead to false discoveries. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4679072 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46790722015-12-16 Methods that remove batch effects while retaining group differences may lead to exaggerated confidence in downstream analyses Nygaard, Vegard Rødland, Einar Andreas Hovig, Eivind Biostatistics Articles Removal of, or adjustment for, batch effects or center differences is generally required when such effects are present in data. In particular, when preparing microarray gene expression data from multiple cohorts, array platforms, or batches for later analyses, batch effects can have confounding effects, inducing spurious differences between study groups. Many methods and tools exist for removing batch effects from data. However, when study groups are not evenly distributed across batches, actual group differences may induce apparent batch differences, in which case batch adjustments may bias, usually deflate, group differences. Some tools therefore have the option of preserving the difference between study groups, e.g. using a two-way ANOVA model to simultaneously estimate both group and batch effects. Unfortunately, this approach may systematically induce incorrect group differences in downstream analyses when groups are distributed between the batches in an unbalanced manner. The scientific community seems to be largely unaware of how this approach may lead to false discoveries. Oxford University Press 2016-01 2015-08-13 /pmc/articles/PMC4679072/ /pubmed/26272994 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/biostatistics/kxv027 Text en © The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Articles Nygaard, Vegard Rødland, Einar Andreas Hovig, Eivind Methods that remove batch effects while retaining group differences may lead to exaggerated confidence in downstream analyses |
title | Methods that remove batch effects while retaining group differences may lead to exaggerated confidence in downstream analyses |
title_full | Methods that remove batch effects while retaining group differences may lead to exaggerated confidence in downstream analyses |
title_fullStr | Methods that remove batch effects while retaining group differences may lead to exaggerated confidence in downstream analyses |
title_full_unstemmed | Methods that remove batch effects while retaining group differences may lead to exaggerated confidence in downstream analyses |
title_short | Methods that remove batch effects while retaining group differences may lead to exaggerated confidence in downstream analyses |
title_sort | methods that remove batch effects while retaining group differences may lead to exaggerated confidence in downstream analyses |
topic | Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4679072/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26272994 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/biostatistics/kxv027 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nygaardvegard methodsthatremovebatcheffectswhileretaininggroupdifferencesmayleadtoexaggeratedconfidenceindownstreamanalyses AT rødlandeinarandreas methodsthatremovebatcheffectswhileretaininggroupdifferencesmayleadtoexaggeratedconfidenceindownstreamanalyses AT hovigeivind methodsthatremovebatcheffectswhileretaininggroupdifferencesmayleadtoexaggeratedconfidenceindownstreamanalyses |